rsmith6621
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:29 PM
Original message |
OK.....Aah-Lie-TOE Is Not Confirmed....Who............. |
|
Will shrub 3rd pitch nominate for SCOTUS.......
1....Someone more conservitive than Alito just to prove he is a horses-ass???
2.....shrub will realize people are on to him and nominate someone more mainstream....
3.....or shrub just leaves WDC in shame......
|
waiting for hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |
Wilms
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
benburch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Doesn't matter what he does. |
|
If we win this one, we either get an acceptable nominee or he never gets to fill that vacancy.
|
Orangepeel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message |
4. he'll just nominate one of the flying pigs |
|
or one of the monkeys that flew out of my butt.
I stongly support a filibuster, but I don't believe that it is going to hold. But, if it did, bush would nominate Priscilla Ownes or Janice Rogers Brown.
|
bettyellen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. oh please, those two are toxic- unconfirmable. not gonna happen. |
|
he'll probably try to find someone with no paper trail like roberts again.
|
Orangepeel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. I didn't say they'd be confirmed. |
|
If a filibuster of Alito were to be successful, then those two would be filibustered as well.
But, IMO, filibustering Alito successfully would not cow bush into nominating a moderate. It would force him into a corner.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:49 PM
Response to Original message |
5. He'll re-nominate Harriet Miers if Alito is not confirmed. |
|
Yes, Harriet Miers. He loves her as a White House staffer. He loves her supplication, her slobbering praise, her dazed expression.
He will hold a press conference to tell Americans that he should have stuck with his girl all along, and that by god those nasty senators had better just listen up.
__
Ok, it's not going to be Harriet Miers. It WILL be Priscilla Owens, though, and that won't be pretty.
|
waiting for hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
"the greatest president ever.:sarcasm:
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yeah!! EVER!! (Hi, wfh. You're on a hot streak tonight. -- |
|
-- thanks for the great posts tonight on DU.)
|
waiting for hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
of pent up stuff last night.....I had to finally go to bed, 5:30 AM comes awfully early...:hi:
|
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-29-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message |
7. He'll nominate Fitzgerald |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 11:51 PM by Cronus Protagonist
|
kath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Leave an opening (or more) on the SC until W's lawbreaking has been fully |
|
investigated. The SC has functioned in the past without the full complement of judges and it can do so again.
|
BigYawn
(877 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Don't ever forget, Bork was filibustered and we got Scalia!!! |
|
Can anyone honestly say we got a good bargain?
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Scalia easily got in after the contentious elevation of Rehnquist to Chief Justice.
After Bork was outright rejected, Reagan's second nominee Ginsberg withdrew after it turned out he was a pothead, and then we got Anthony Kennedy.
|
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message |
12. What is A$hcroft doing these days? |
wiley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
would be his only option. Remember Harriet Meirs? The Pukes killed her nomination. Do you think they were scared of losing their jobs? And they Dems should stand up and say they are going to fix this *ed up Medicare bill, and stop billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid. This is not about *. It's about OUR country being taken over.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 05:24 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Just as Alito was much more conservative then Miers, if there is to be next one, he/she will be more conservative then Alito . But it's a moot point.
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 06:22 AM
Response to Original message |
17. There will be no third nominee. |
|
Stevens will stay alive just to spite him.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Don't know; don't much care |
|
Let's take these fights one at a time.
I notice that Republican Senatory Lincoln Chaffee has said he will not vote to confirm Mr. Alito. Should I hold my breath waiting for headlines trumpeting the "bipartisan" opposition to the nomination?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message |