Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time Exclusive: Charges Sought Against Rumsfeld Over Prison Abuse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 04:06 PM
Original message
Time Exclusive: Charges Sought Against Rumsfeld Over Prison Abuse
Along with Rumsfeld, Gonzales and Tenet, the other defendants in the case are Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence Stephen Cambone; former assistant attorney general Jay Bybee; former deputy assisant attorney general John Yoo; General Counsel for the Department of Defense William James Haynes II; and David S. Addington, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff. Senior military officers named in the filing are General Ricardo Sanchez, the former top Army official in Iraq; Gen. Geoffrey Miller, the former commander of Guantanamo; senior Iraq commander, Major General Walter Wojdakowski; and Col. Thomas Pappas, the one-time head of military intelligence at Abu Ghraib.

Germany was chosen for the court filing because German law provides "universal jurisdiction" allowing for the prosecution of war crimes and related offenses that take place anywhere in the world. Indeed, a similar, but narrower, legal action was brought in Germany in 2004, which also sought the prosecution of Rumsfeld. The case provoked an angry response from Pentagon, and Rumsfeld himself was reportedly upset. Rumsfeld's spokesman at the time, Lawrence DiRita, called the case a "a big, big problem." U.S. officials made clear the case could adversely impact U.S.-Germany relations, and Rumsfeld indicated he would not attend a major security conference in Munich, where he was scheduled to be the keynote speaker, unless Germany disposed of the case. The day before the conference, a German prosecutor announced he would not pursue the matter, saying there was no indication that U.S. authorities and courts would not deal with allegations in the complaint.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1557842,00.html

Looks like they're going after the entire gang. anyone think they'll be successful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why isn't the United States doing this instead of Germany? What a flip of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. OH SHIT!!! like the old saying be careful what you wish for...
the Administration talked all this stuff about war crimes well now the tables are turned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does "universal jurisdiction" mean none of these defendants could EVER
go to any country that has an extradition treaty with Germany?

The fact that John "Torture Is Nice" Yoo is among those named makes me especially happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't know what it means. I imagine he's safe as long as he stays in the US
unless someone is dispatched to kidnap them or something like that. Yes I agree, Yoo deseves his own special place in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. If indicted, we will have to extradite them to Germany.
Even a presidential pardon wouldn't save Rummie and Yoo and the rest from prosecution under the UN Convention Against Torture.

The wheels of justice are turning, and are about to roll over those criminals.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So our choice would be either to extradite them or be in breach of our
treaty?

Of course, we know how deeply The Decider cares about treaties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC