NO Hillary in 2008: That would be 24 years of two family rule

[Lethe]

This is a democracy for christ sakes.

NO MORE BUSHES OR CLINTONS PLZ!

[NNN0LHI]

1. Senator Clinton would make a fine President

I will take your ranting under advisement though.

Don

[tsuki]

2. Until she calls for an apology from Carville for dissing Dr. Dean

and the grassroots, like she did from Kerry for a botched joke, she has lost any consideration for President that I would give her.

[kimmerspixelated]

3. Yes, yes, yes

I think everyone wants a fresh face and name!!! Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton(NO!!!) Although technically it is Gore in there!

[William769]

4. "This is a democracy for christ sakes".

"NO Hillary in 2008" Now that very Democratic! :eyes:

[HamdenRice]

5. I agree -- no more nepotism as political principle -- with ONE xception!!!

Al Gore, Jr., son of Sen. Al Gore, in 2008. After that, no more legacy presidents.

[RB TexLa]

6. Or we could just let the American people choose

[ret5hd]

7. You're scared, aren't you?

:rofl:

[porphyrian]

8. I'm against it simply because republicans are trying to frame her as who we'll run.

They don't get to set our policy and determine the winner of our primaries.

[LoZoccolo]

9. It would still be a democracy if people voted for her.

See you in 2008.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=user&saz=ignore_list

[Hav]

10. .

That should be the last reason to be against her :eyes:.
She isn't my favourite candidate (maybe not even top 5), but if you are against her, you should make a better case. Seriously, there may be better reasons not to like her than the fact that she is Bill's wife.