Seen on Bartcop Weird Repug/Lieberman fact

[antonialee839]

Conspiracy Corner, anyone?
Here's something interesting...

In 2000, Joe Lieberman's Republican challenger received 448,077 votes,

In 2006, Joe Lieberman's Democratic challenger received 448,077 votes.

Hmmmmmm...
Skip
http://www.bartcop.com/

[razors edge]

1. Been out for a day or two

on the "conspiracy sites" so I didn't post it here. I figured it would makes it's way around.

And yes, damned odd.

[Redroach]

2. Saw it on Bartcop also.

Coincidences anyone?


:wtf:

[madokie]

3. Interesting to say the least

[rainy]

4. I can't find this and I'd like to forward it. Can anyone tell me

where on Bartcop to find this?

[Pale Blue Dot]

5. Listen, I live in CT. I worked for Lamont. I loathe Lieberman.

But there is no conspiracy. He really won this one. I knew it weeks ago, talking to Democrats and Independents while phone banking for Lamont.

This is an interesting factoid, but it means nothing.

[silverojo]

6. I know Lieberman won, but....

The exact same number of votes is one damned weird concidence.

[Algorem]

7. the number of assholes in Connecticut has stayed eggzaktly the same for

5 years?

OK,6 years,same fukking thing.

[progdonkey]

8. assholes?

I'm hoping you misread the post. It's the tally for Lieberman's challengers that's the same, not for Lieberman.

[Algorem]

9. oops,misread it.still,this state needs to be carpet-bombed.it's only a little

one anyway.we can excise it like a tumor with a thorough,precise,sustained carpet-bombing.after all,we dictate what goes on now.