Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Doesn’t Shutter Clinton Campaign Offices

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 02:05 AM
Original message
Election Doesn’t Shutter Clinton Campaign Offices
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/11/nyregion/11hillary.html

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s re-election race may be over, but she is hardly closing up her campaign shop or worrying about deep debts.

Advisers to Mrs. Clinton say she has more than $10 million left in her political bank account, not to mention a priceless reservoir of speeches, issue research, and financial networks nationally for any future use.

Her advisers also say that she does not intend to disassemble her campaign apparatus and staff, as many candidates do when an election ends, nor does she plan to immediately close her New York City and Washington campaign offices.

Indeed, the Clinton camp has spent months building a re-election team that could easily shift into gear for a 2008 presidential bid. Fresh from her landslide victory, and with a fistful of I.O.U.’s from winning Democratic candidates nationally, Mrs. Clinton is comfortably positioned as she prepares to enter an important period of strategy talks, reading and reflection while deciding whether to run.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...While deciding whether to run?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did she donate any of her money to other democrats?
I know I got letters of solicitation from her, but she was sitting on a huge war chest of her own. Did she share any of it, like Kerry did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. She spent this huge crazy amount on her own re-election
to get up to a gaudy 67% margin to catapult her to higher callings.

Having said that, at least she WAS up for re-election, unlike Kerry, Bayh... no idea if she managed to give any to other candidates but, she has her excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. On another thread
it was stated that she gave at least 3 million dollars to other candidates, and that she also campaigned heavily for other candidates, helping them raise untold amounts of money.

Confucius say "Slaying mother dragon when no other mother in sight very foolish".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Kerry raised $14 million
for 260 candidates and campaigned in 43 states. 29 candidates that were specifically targeted by the netroots, won. Nobody did more than John Kerry in this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He did a lot for himself too.
I'm not unhappy with what Kerry did. But before nominating him for sainthood, people still saw him hoard a lot of money for himself when he wasn't up for election and when a unique opportunity presented itself. (As it turns out, the "unique opportunity" prediction was correct.) So in that sense, at the time when the criticism was high, perhaps he could have done even more. And on a small scale, he did.

I dont' know what Bayh did but he was mentioned as a really bad offender, acting like he owed the party none of his own war chest at all. Perhaps like Kerry, he felt like he owed others, other people's money. It's certainly a hell of a lot different from sitting on your hands but, as I said, I'm not sure about nominating Kerry for sainthood here. The purpose of the original criticism was not to beat up on Kerry as a bad person! It was to get cash where the cash was needed most in critical races which were decided by VERY thin margins.

At any rate, the Democratic party squeaked by and there's little point in pointing accusing fingers. I'm going to mention here rather than take up more bandwidth that I see the other poster say Hillary donated $3 mil out of her heavy expenditures (she spent 10 times that on her own race). Can't call that unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC