Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A more feasible way for the Repukes to get rid of Dubya

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 04:55 PM
Original message
A more feasible way for the Repukes to get rid of Dubya
I was going to write this big screed as I usually do, but decided to do this instead:

The Republican Party knows that Bush has to go if they want any chance of capturing the White House in 2012. (I think 2008 is a lost cause for them.) If Bush stays in office until the end of his term, we're looking at Democrats for at least the next three two-term administrations.

They also know Cheney has to go. More to the point, they know he has to go first.

They'll get rid of Cheney in one of two ways: they'll either make him resign for reasons of ill health, which was what the Soviets called it when they shot their troublesome apparatchiks, or they'll have him go hunting with Harry Whittington and goad Harry about how Cheney just shot him in the face for no good reason and then laughed in it until Whittington turns around and lets Cheney have it right in his scowling mug...of course, Mr. Whittington won't quite remember that they were hunting polar bears until after he pulls the trigger.

Either way, Vice President Cheney will no longer be VP, and they'll need someone to replace him--someone who meets the two most important criteria, which are the ability to be president of the United States and the inability to run in 2008. Think of all the Republicans who might want to be president, like Condi, Catkiller, Jeb, McCain, Kathy Harris, Ken Blackwell and the like. None of them would take a two-year presidency.

Right now y'all are scratching your heads: if someone takes over for Shrub, couldn't he or she serve for 10 years? The Constitution says so. Reality says otherwise. If someone goes in there and does the things the country needs, like closing the war down, resetting the tax structure to December 2000 levels, putting the Fairness Doctrine, Habeas Corpus, the Kyoto Protocols, membership in the International Criminal Court and all the other things Bush pulled us out of...the large money, fundies and freepers who keep the GOP alive will stay home on Election Day 2008. If he DOESN'T do any of those things, if he tries to stay the course Bush set, the other ninety percent of the country will rise up, and nothing will keep a Democrat from being elected.

BUT! If the GOP picks someone who has no political future to do all the dirty work they know needs to be done, they can get someone who will promise middle-class tax cuts, who will promise "family values," who will run a generic GOP campaign and possibly even get elected.

The only person in America who meets the requirements, who has no political future and who has the credentials to be president right now, is George Herbert Walker Bush. Bush the Elder has a ton of baggage of his own, but then again so do most of the Repukes. I think he's the only one they can RELY on to fix his rotten kid's damage.

The post-Cheney scenario: They first get Bush peré installed as VP. Junior then steps down and is handed over to the US Marshals Service. The 43 Administration receives total blame for everything bad that happened since 2001. Everyone except Junior, who will be executed, receives life without parole. Bush 44 steps up to the plate and performs some needed reforms. I don't expect the Fairness Doctrine to be reinstated, but I do expect the ICC to be reapproved and some of our worst war criminals to be renditioned to The Hague.

I don't WANT GHWB to be president again. Right now, I don't think the Republican Party has much of a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting.
Might work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. nominated for fantasy post of the day
although I do agree that if there was a vacancy in the VP, that you could make a strong case for GWHB as caretaker VP -- in fact I posted something to that effect back last March: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2484430#2487329

However, the idea that if chimpy serves out the next two years the repubs are destined to lose the WH in 2008 is awfully speculative at this point. I hope its true, but since I have no clue who will be on either the Democratic ticket or the repub ticket, assuming it to be the case is pretty much a waste of time.

Look at it this way: 10 months ago, most people were saying that the Democrats had virtually no chance to capture the House or the Senate. In other words, a lot can happen in a relatively short time.

So, while I have no problem with fantasy politics, the fact is that we should stay focused on what we can and should be accomplishing in the next 100 days, and then the 100 days after than, and after that, rather than indulging in imaginary scenarios.

At least that's my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. well thought and well put
i think pelosi is smart and i would trust conyers with my very life

it's ok to not impeach, just hold criminal charges over bushco's head if they obstruct the dem cure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC