Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the legal age to Serve be raised from 18 to 21?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:04 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should the legal age to Serve be raised from 18 to 21?
Edited on Sat Nov-11-06 06:05 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Should the legal age to Serve in the Military be raised from 18 to 21?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. The other Polls got me wondering...
Should the legal smoking age be increased from 18 to 21?
Poll result (38 votes)
Yes (11 votes, 29%)
No (27 votes, 71%)


Should the legal drinking age be lowered from 21 to 18?
Edited on Sat Nov-11-06 02:56 PM by Alexander
Poll result (81 votes)
Yes (44 votes, 54%)
No (37 votes, 46%)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. That would reduce the brainwashability of the recruits. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. It seems to me they should be able to smoke and drink if they
can give their life....but I'm not sure raising the min age would change much. They still smoke and drink.

I do know two of my children joined the marines and went to Desert Storm (twins- boy and a girl), and it made a man and a woman out of both of them...and gave me alot of gray hairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stonecoldsober Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd be interested in a discussion of the pros and cons
I voted no because if I were going to be drafted I'd rather get it out of the way as early as possible before I became vested in a career, marriage, kids, etc. Now if we are talking pure volunteer the only concern I would have is it would make it very hard to maintain a military (IMHO) for the same reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do you believe that 18 year olds are incapable of deciding for themselves?
Edited on Sat Nov-11-06 06:27 PM by Jim__
If so, do you think the age of sexual consent should be raised to 21? I realize joining the military generally has the potential for more dire consequences than having sex; but, if 18 year olds are not capable of thinking for themselves, shouldn't we protect them in all areas?

I think 18 year olds can decide for themselves. I disagree with a lot of decisions they make. I believe a lot of their decisions are due to inexperience. But I really don't believe I have more right to think for them than they have to think for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. In addition
If they're not capable to make that decision, what's to say they won't lose their right to vote as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Teenagers aren't yet capable of making adult decisions
The military knows this, and preys upon it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would say no
That's not the answer. Instead, we need a truth in recruiting law. Recruiters must be required by law to tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. They are.
Recruiters get in big trouble if 'caught' 'lying'.
Lies by ommission are common, and not counted.
And 'caught' means that there is no way for them to weasel out of it.
Funny thing, you're more likely to be 'caught' if you're below quota...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC