Special Panel Could Help Reshape Policy: Plan expected Dec.

[cal04]

Bipartisan Group's Plan Expected in Dec.

After meeting with President Bush tomorrow, a panel of prestigious Americans will begin deliberations to chart a new course on Iraq, with the goal of stabilizing the country with a different U.S. strategy and possibly the withdrawal of troops.

Tuesday's dramatic election results, widely seen as a repudiation of the Bush Iraq policy, has thrust the 10-member, bipartisan Iraq Study Group into the kind of special role played by the Sept. 11 commission. This panel, led by former secretary of state James A. Baker III and former Indiana congressman Lee H. Hamilton (D), might play a decisive role in reshaping the U.S. position in Iraq, according to lawmakers and administration officials.

Those familiar with the panel's work predict that the ultimate recommendations will not appear novel and that there are few, if any, good options left facing the country. Many of the ideas reportedly being considered -- more aggressive regional diplomacy with Syria and Iran, greater emphasis on training Iraqi troops, or focusing on a new political deal between warring Shiite and Sunni factions -- have either been tried or have limited chances of success, in the view of many experts on Iraq. Baker is also exploring whether a broader U.S. initiative in tackling the Arab-Israeli conflict is needed to help stabilize the region.

(snip)
Though Hamilton had a hand in selecting the Democrats on the group, its makeup reflects Baker's pragmatic, centrist approach to foreign policy. Few of its 10 members are true foreign policy experts. Rather, it is a classic Washington blue-ribbon commission, a group of "old hands" steeped in the ways of the capital -- two former secretaries of state (Baker and Lawrence S. Eagleburger), two former senators (Republican Alan K. Simpson and Democrat Charles S. Robb), a former defense secretary (William J. Perry) and a former Supreme Court justice, (Sandra Day O'Connor).

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/11/AR2006111100996.html

[bullimiami]

1. do you think theyll recommend staying the course and adapting to win?

or cutting and running and letting the terrorists win?

[FogerRox]

2. They knew they would get kicked in the election and got Baker involved

Now we see their plan, eff 'em.

[Jackpine Radical]

3. That crowd ain't gonna come up with anything workable.

Ignoring for the moment that probly nothing CAN work, I can't imagine these people having anything useful to bring forward.

My committee would be Kerry, Murtha, Feingold, Wes Clark, Shinseki & a few others like that.

[pinto]

4. Yeah, but the old hands are their *only* gambit. I'm curious

what will come out of the ISG. I'm assuming it may be a proposed phased withdrawal and/or entrenchment in the Green Zone, cum political package, incorporating any remaining Arab allies as brokers, to save face all around. A little late to pick up these pieces, imo, but any movement away from "stay the course" coupled with the impending Democratic control of oversight, funding and appointment confirmations will be a move in a less deadly direction.

ed for misplaced emphasis and clarity.