ncteechur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 07:56 AM
Original message |
They seriously need to revoke her license to speak for the party. |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 07:57 AM by ncteechur
Who is she working for now? What is her gig? Donna Brazile that is. This was meant as a reply rather than a post. Ooops!
|
peacebird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message |
1. which show are you watching? |
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Washington Journal on Cspan1 |
|
she'd annoying, but not as annoying as Michael Steele, so it evens out I guess.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
she`s no longer associated with any democrat. look for the talk shows to invite her on to comment on how badly the democrats are running the show. her and carville will be booked up for the next year
|
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Donna Brazile claims to speak for the entire Democratic Party? Really? |
|
Care to provide a quote when she said that?
Dislike her if you wish, but try to stay within the fabric of reality.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. The talk shows treat her as if she were a spokesman |
|
She's always being brought on to represent the Democratic/Liberal view of things.
Therefore, there is a perception that she's some kind of representative.
|
liberalmike27
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That Lieberman who is driving me up the wall right now on MTPress.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message |