Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: Russ Feingold is not running for President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 08:08 AM
Original message
Breaking: Russ Feingold is not running for President
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 08:11 AM by Perky
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FEINGOLD_PRESIDENT?SITE=CATOR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-12-07-02-08


MILWAUKEE (AP) -- U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold has decided against seeking the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, saying he wanted to focus on his work in the Senate.

In a letter posted on his political action committee's Web site, Feingold said he was excited that Tuesday's elections gave Democrats control of both chambers of Congress, giving them the chance to "undo much of the damage that one-party rule has done to America."

"We can actually advance progressive solutions to such major issues as guaranteed health care, dependence on oil and our unbalanced trade policies," he wrote.

Feingold, 53, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel he realized he would be a long-shot candidate in a bid for the presidency.

He said running as an underdog appealed to him, but not the way it would "dismantle" his work in the Senate and his personal life.

An outspoken opponent of the Iraq war, the Patriot Act and other Bush administration policies, Feingold had formed his PAC, the Progressive Patriots Fund, and visited key presidential primary states such as Iowa and New Hampshire.

Still, he said he started the process more predisposed against a run than for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. He could always be tapped for Vice President
by Al Gore. That would be another winning combo for me.

I think he is making a wise choice at this juncture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. I actually saw this coming
Rudd is an insuregent and its hard tun that typ pf campaign then your party is in power and the president is a lame duck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. HMMMM do I hear wedding bells?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Feingold not participating in '08 is a loss.
He would have added an important message and had a good effect overall on the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Damn that sucks...
Think of this....

Out of the thusfar mentioned Presidential candidates from the Senate only Feingold and Obama were against the war and Obama plays both sides so effectively that he has generally aligned himself with the same people Hillary has.

Not exactly the choice we're looking for at a time when everyone is completely against this war.

If Kerry drops out and Gore chooses to never run, I'm not going to be very thrilled with our field at all.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. only Feingold and Obama
were against the war?

Clark was one of the most outspoken on avoiding a war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. and Clark
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Read my statement... I said Senatorial candidates...
I didn't state Clark because he wasn't one.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Oh, terribly sorry. And why is that such an important
distinction?

Obama was not a Senator when the vote was taken, and neither was Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Important because they will be frontrunners automatically
The Senate provides them with daily press coverage that Gore or Clark will not have.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Kerry's not dropping out - I'm sure he's looking forward to the debates as we all are.
Except maybe those who have been trying to manipulate their way to be on stage unopposed.

Heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. But the candidate doesn't have to be a Senator.
In fact, it's better if he/she isn't. It's too bad Feingold won't be a candidate -- I like him a lot -- but there are some very good non-Senator candidates out there, like Wes Clark, who don't have a voting record that can be used against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Mark Dayton for President in 2008?
The National Journal also has compiled a ranking of the top ten liberals in the Senate according to lifetime voting record. Neither Kerry nor Edwards is on the list:

National Journal: Most liberal senators, lifetime voting
1. Mark Dayton, D-Minn.
2. Paul Sarbanes, D-Md.
3. Jack Reed, D-R.I.
4. Jon Corzine, D-N.J.
5. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.
6. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.
7. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa
8. Richard Durbin, D-Ill.
9. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J.
10. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt

More:
http://mostliberalsenator.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. As a Minnesotan, I can say
Mark Dayton is not a viable candidate. He would have been hard-pressed to win in Minnesota because the media would have gone in for the kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I concur.
Dayton turned out to be a disappointment in many ways. I would not support him as a presidential candidate (not that he's ever indicated he'd run). He's been inconsistent on some important issues, and he's not a good speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Russ Feingold has a personal statement about this posted at Daily Kos
Dear Friends and Supporters,

On Sunday, November 12th in Racine, I will hold my 1000th Listening Session with the people of Wisconsin. Before reaching that milestone, I want you to know that I've decided to continue my role as Wisconsin's Junior Senator in the U.S. Senate and not to seek the Democratic nomination for President in 2008.


more...

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/11/12/8554/2518
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm ok with him continuing his work in the Senate.
Still sucks, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder if the beltway insiders (carville and crew) still think censure was for political posturing
When Senator Feingold introduced the radical idea of holding this administration to account for their crimes against the constitution, he was poo-poo'd by every D.C. insider in the country. They all said he was doing it for political ambitions in 2008.

Everyone who said that can now FUCK OFF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC