Remember this article?

[KingFlorez]

It's amusing to look at the pre-election article and laugh at how wrong this people were

http://online.barrons.com/public/article/SB116138396438799484-uMRQ4ejl3lonVnJ_TXy6k9fPXls_20061121.html?mod=9_0002_b_free_features

[malaise]

1. HaHaHa

What bothers me is that other morons with similar predictions are still on MSM expecting to be taken seriously. You would think people like Brad Blakeman would crawl into a hole and disappear for a while.

[salin]

2. particularly funny is their bragging that they were more

right than others in 2004 - and that they (gleefully, by their tone) ignored polls. Their entire analysis rested on $ raised. And in the races they highlighted they pretty much got it wrong to a person. Thanks for posting - it was a good laugh.

[Ediacara]

3. I stopped reading at this statement

"We studied every single race -- all 435 House seats and 33 in the Senate -- and based our predictions about the outcome in almost every race on which candidate had the largest campaign war chest, a sign of superior grass-roots support."

If they base their analysis on that kind of bullshit, no wonder they were wrong...

[qnr]

4. Guess they'll have to do a little rethinking. n/t