|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:33 PM Original message |
Send 500,000 impeachment letters to Pelosi by her first day as speaker Jan. 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. Don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I wonder if they thought it was a waste of time in 1974? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:41 PM Original message |
Read the history. Nixon wasn't impeached he was investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. I know the history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
40. You made my point: Nixon resigned before impeachment began. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 06:26 PM Response to Reply #40 |
58. And why did he resign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. He resigned because Republican Senators told him to after investigations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #60 |
77. The "debacle" part... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 02:05 PM Response to Reply #77 |
94. Yeah I don't get the constant comparisons between the Clinton impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 05:40 PM Response to Reply #94 |
100. Actually, Nixon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 04:05 AM Response to Reply #100 |
121. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caledesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #18 |
81. I lived it too. Articles of Impeachment were drawn up. See link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
25. He would have been impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. First steps first and then impeachment won't even be necessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:44 PM Response to Reply #39 |
51. I agree...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just-plain-Kathy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
95. I think writing Pelosi is a great idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Right -- let's make it 1.000.000! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
72. Love your sig! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 05:37 PM Response to Reply #72 |
99. Second the motion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 12:13 AM Response to Reply #99 |
110. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
88. Dailykoff sig: 59% of Nancy Pelosi's constituents voted to put impeachement ON the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 12:14 AM Response to Reply #88 |
111. hey thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. So holding the bush administration to account for their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Investigating and public exposure is the first step of accountability. Impeach way down the line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Pelosi and those in Congress know procedure, we tell them how serious the offenses are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. You would be cool with half a million or so letters demanding "investigation"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:14 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. You're already getting investigation and impeachment is off the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:18 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Just becase we want impeachment doesn't mean we'll get it. From a downthread post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
32. Don't waste her time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. Yeah, we don' t need that constitution stuff and rule of law stuff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. You won't get constitution stuff and rule of law stuff without public hearings first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
civildisoBDence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 03:35 PM Response to Reply #43 |
97. If Pelosi had called for impeachment, it would have looked like she was angling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 05:45 PM Response to Reply #97 |
101. I've had this same thought... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
105. How about we ignore you, follow our conscience... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 11:55 PM Response to Reply #105 |
109. You can try putting words in my mouth but that is a cheap tactic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 01:05 AM Response to Reply #109 |
112. Yeah, that was kinda out of line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 05:32 AM Response to Reply #112 |
122. You are forgiven. My policy is "investigate and expose". Make resignation inevitable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. Fantastic idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
108. How about this - send a letter EVERY WEEK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 01:08 AM Response to Reply #108 |
113. YOU GOT IT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 01:19 AM Response to Reply #113 |
114. Kick against the stupid copycat discouragement thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. I wish I could get behind this...but I just can't. What candidate ran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Anyone who ran on promises of impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. That my friend....is the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Doesn't mean it shouldn't happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
50. not by voters but by GOP PR machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
106. With all due respect, you have absolutely no way to know that's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. we can do both. and impeachment weakens Bush ability to block change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. You may be right, but after Bush we have to get Cheney. This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
73. this will directly weaken war-mongers hand especially investigating Cheney's energy task force |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caledesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
82. Agree. Iraq, then let the American people know that they care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
90. 1 candidate won out of 21 endorsed by ImpeachPac (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. I would love it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. They need to hear that we want justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. even getting to point of a vote would stain Bush and some repubs might be forced by constituents to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
keepCAblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. A lot of repubs are seething mad at chimpy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. 5th Rec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
26. Yep--like Bush said, gotta repeat things to catterpult the propaganda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberty Belle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. anthrax screening delays all mail. E-mail and calls are best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DODI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. Alas, there are no more telegrams -- not from Western Union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
14. We really cannot do this. It would kill us for 2k8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:49 PM Response to Reply #14 |
23. how do you figure that? Did it hurt GOP when they did it to Clinton on BS charges? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. It isn't cowardice. It is smart. Even Dean knows this is the wrong move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
63. dean et al are being circumspect so that it will look like we are forcing their hand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bliss_eternal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:09 PM Response to Reply #23 |
38. I will never understand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
64. thanks for noticing. If they don't like it, THEY can do something else or as seems to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:27 PM Response to Reply #38 |
66. I remember these kind of noises about Kerry & vote rigging in 2004: "be quiet! It's taken care of!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:05 PM Response to Reply #38 |
107. It's probably because those same posters are a lot more conservative... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rg302200 (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 07:32 PM Response to Reply #23 |
62. Yea it did...don't you remember what it did for Clinton's popularity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. You are saying that getting political power is more important than using it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. OMFG! Don't be daft! You don't need impeachment to fucking investigate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. As I mentioned upthread, this now looks like an argument over semantics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
35. Of all the reasons not to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yes!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greenman3610 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
22. The voters have already consigned him to Hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
33. I wonder if my rep-to-be, Gabrielle Giffords, has a DC address, yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:38 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. Put her name & house of representatives on it, and she'll eventually get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:56 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. I emailed her for a current address. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
79. Excellent letter! So you see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
36. Not now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:39 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. they can stockpile the evidence that we are behind them for when shit hits the fan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeE (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
37. No one would like to see him impeached more than me, but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:37 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. she represents us--you're making the DLC argument: vote for us then go back to sleep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #37 |
75. What's off the table can come back on the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 03:59 AM Response to Reply #37 |
119. His party will not do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 04:04 AM Response to Reply #119 |
120. recall Blairs problems recently and the theat of impeachment. He will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemPower (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
45. Excellent Work yurbud! Thank you!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
49. A huge call for impeachment would set Pelosi up to say something like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:45 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. and when the investigation leads there, she will know she has the mandate to go forward |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bliss_eternal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:46 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. When did she say it was off the table...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 07:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. Immediately after the 2006 elections, like Wednesday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
53. I think demanding investigations might be a better idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:28 PM Response to Reply #53 |
67. then do so. just put "Dear Nancy" on top of your post and mail it to address provided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:58 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. I'm not sure if that is sarcasm or if you found my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:37 PM Response to Reply #53 |
68. Part of the "mandate" comes from who is shouting loudest with most voices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. Like I said before, ultimately this will be decided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 03:20 AM Response to Reply #74 |
85. I hope you are right, but it would be dangerous to remain silent given dems recent track record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
55. some seem to be ignoring crucial difference with Nixon case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
57. consider alternative scenario: we sit by quietly, they investigate, get up to impeachment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
59. simple- the dems investigate bush and bring charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
65. IMPEACH BUSH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. Swampy, cross post this anywhere you visit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
69. Another advantage to calling for impeachment: makes investigations look moderate and restrained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
71. This is the way it must happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
78. Postcards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 03:30 AM Response to Reply #78 |
87. I was thinking of that, but haven't taken time to condense message down to postcard length |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
puebloknot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 05:32 PM Response to Reply #87 |
98. This is great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-12-06 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
80. No thanks. Pelosi has an excellent agenda already. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
83. we must do this...the democrats have told us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 03:21 AM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Great! Pass it on too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 02:55 AM Response to Original message |
84. Over 500K - Keep them coming! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
89. Can we say Tsunami ?? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
91. I can't believe people are still resisting this. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
92. The letter is good but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Workers To Power (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. nah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
96. Impeachment is up TO THE PEOPLE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 06:32 PM Response to Reply #96 |
102. you'll notice on my impeachment poll thread that the "shut up" position is a decided minority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
103. POLL: let fellow DUers know "shut up about impeachment" is a minority opinion LINK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
104. IMPEACHMENT POSTCARDS now available (LINK) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
115. Kick again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
116. Kickety Kick Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 03:54 AM Response to Original message |
117. John Nichols, today said he was VERY disappointed in Pesoli |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-16-06 03:37 AM Response to Reply #117 |
123. the best thing the Democrats could do is stop taking ANY of the free advice right wing pundits give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 03:58 AM Response to Original message |
118. you better believe I will send her a hand written letter --! thanks for the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC