begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:01 PM
Original message |
List examples of when "bipartisanship" actually worked, for real. |
|
and for each example, which side actually benefitted more from the deal.
|
IMayBeWrongBut
(470 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Kinda funny how there are no replies to this. nt |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. No it's not funny in the least. It's a contradictory request. |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 10:20 PM by BlooInBloo
If one "side actually benefited more from the deal", then BY DEFINITION, it didn't "work" - one side got taken. Duh.
EDIT: "funny" -> "surprising"; The OP may as well have asked for an examples of squares, and then have us say which side was longer than the others.
|
begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. So, in your view, it's only "bipartisanship" if both sides each get EXACTLY 50% of the deal? |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. (shrug) If you don't like the 50-50 idea, why don't you tell me what... |
|
... "actually worked" means?
|
begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Tell ya what. Let's form a bipartisan task force and allocate $1 billion to study this question. |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. You're right. I shoulda just packed it in at your contradictory request... |
|
... the making of such a request really does foreshadow everything else you might say - lol!
Lesson learned - thanks!
|
hughee99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. As I see it, it's more a matter of apples and oranges... |
|
Who actually "benefited" the most depends on the value one places on what they've gained, since rarely are the deals easily comparable. Even when it comes down to strictly money, does 1 billion spent on defense have the same value as 1 billion spent on education? I would suggest that the true definition of a bipartisan deal is that both sides were willing to give up what they did in order to gain what they got.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Needless complexification. "Perceived value" suffices. |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message |
2. When Bob Dole and Ted Kennedy ran the Senate. |
|
They managed to turn around a lot of Reagan's dumb policies. Like taxes, funding for HUD, etc.
|
ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
The problem is that most people only remember the last decade. There are dozens of examples pre 1994 that most people would never remember anyways.
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Uh, when Shrub "won" in 2000 and ALL THE FUCKING MEDIA SAID |
|
that he was going to be BIPARTISAN??????? Is THAT an example??????
|
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I still have to say the anti-telemarketing law is the ONLY good thing... |
|
to come out of the Bush presidency.
But now, I would be willing to bet that the Do Not Call Registry was incorporated into the NSA Database.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 10:29 PM by high density
I still have a partial recording of Al Gore debating Ross Perot on Larry King about it. DU's favorite, Al Gore, sounds like a Republican!
|
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I would guess that the Interstate Highway |
|
system had bi-partisan support. I have heard Ike pushed it as a national defense thing and I would guess it had a lot of Democratic support too because of the public works jobs it created. Anything like that in todays political climate would be called socialism.
|
conscious evolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
10. When the founding fathers |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message |