Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List examples of when "bipartisanship" actually worked, for real.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:01 PM
Original message
List examples of when "bipartisanship" actually worked, for real.
and for each example, which side actually benefitted more from the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IMayBeWrongBut Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kinda funny how there are no replies to this. nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No it's not funny in the least. It's a contradictory request.
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 10:20 PM by BlooInBloo
If one "side actually benefited more from the deal", then BY DEFINITION, it didn't "work" - one side got taken. Duh.

EDIT: "funny" -> "surprising"; The OP may as well have asked for an examples of squares, and then have us say which side was longer than the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. So, in your view, it's only "bipartisanship" if both sides each get EXACTLY 50% of the deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. (shrug) If you don't like the 50-50 idea, why don't you tell me what...
... "actually worked" means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Tell ya what. Let's form a bipartisan task force and allocate $1 billion to study this question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You're right. I shoulda just packed it in at your contradictory request...
... the making of such a request really does foreshadow everything else you might say - lol!

Lesson learned - thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. As I see it, it's more a matter of apples and oranges...
Who actually "benefited" the most depends on the value one places on what they've gained, since rarely are the deals easily comparable. Even when it comes down to strictly money, does 1 billion spent on defense have the same value as 1 billion spent on education? I would suggest that the true definition of a bipartisan deal is that both sides were willing to give up what they did in order to gain what they got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Needless complexification. "Perceived value" suffices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. When Bob Dole and Ted Kennedy ran the Senate.
They managed to turn around a lot of Reagan's dumb policies. Like taxes, funding for HUD, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup...
The problem is that most people only remember the last decade. There are dozens of examples pre 1994 that most people would never remember anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Uh, when Shrub "won" in 2000 and ALL THE FUCKING MEDIA SAID
that he was going to be BIPARTISAN??????? Is THAT an example??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. I still have to say the anti-telemarketing law is the ONLY good thing...
to come out of the Bush presidency.

But now, I would be willing to bet that the Do Not Call Registry was incorporated into the NSA Database.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. NAFTA??
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 10:29 PM by high density
I still have a partial recording of Al Gore debating Ross Perot on Larry King about it. DU's favorite, Al Gore, sounds like a Republican!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would guess that the Interstate Highway
system had bi-partisan support. I have heard Ike pushed it as a national defense thing and I would guess it had a lot of Democratic support too because of the public works jobs it created. Anything like that in todays political climate would be called socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. When the founding fathers
wrote the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC