Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are you satisfied with Dean's job thus far as DNC Chair?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:45 PM
Original message
Poll question: Are you satisfied with Dean's job thus far as DNC Chair?
I remember poor Terry McAuliffe, who almost never said something I didn't think could be said better, and only seemed to raise money by going behind the scenes to some stereotypical cigar-smoke filled room. When you're outclassed in "spin alley" by Ed motherfucking Gillespie it makes people who identify as members of your party very sad. I'm proud of Dean as our DNC chair because he reaches out to average, unconnected people for money, and because he sees Democrats in red states as people, not stastically insignificant markers on a gameboard. Also because he speaks from the heart, and what's there is straightforward and powerful in its simplicity and honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep, and it's largely because, as you so eloquently put it,
"he sees Democrats in red states as people."

I could not be happier with Dean. He really fought hard in races the Democratic Congressional establishment wrote off as lost causes, and it paid off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W.E.B. Du Bois Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am the lone dissenter
Well going into the 2006 elections I really thought the Democrats were going to be in trouble because it seemed that Dean had been looking at strategically unimportant areas and neglecting battleground states and districts. I suspect that the Democrats succeeded DESPITE such a poor strategy.

That's just the way life is. You have to be good at electoral strategy or you are more likely to lose. Sure it would be nice to build up the party base in South Carolina or wherever he is sending the money, but it makes more sense to target swing areas where the return to your $$$ is greater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It sure helped the Democratic infrastructure in those states...
helping to take Governorships, state houses, local races... they all benefitted. Remember how important state legislatures are in defining Congressional districts and I shouldn't have to remind you how important a strategic SOS here and there can affect elections (or prevent the stealing of one).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We could have a House seat in WYOMING, for crying out loud.
We haven't had a seat there since 1979, when Dick Cheney represented them.

And not all the votes have been counted, so the seat is still up in the air.

Do you still think Dean's strategy was so poor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. as of Friday, Wyoming is still counting provisional ballots
we need 31 more votes to trigger an automatic recount!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. There are reasons why the red states are red, Dean's simply appealing to that.
It's a good strategy. Montana, North Carolina, Colorado, Kansas and Arizona are only red to a certain point - a Democrat did win the South within the past 30 years (Carter) and most of the west within the past 45 (Johnson).

It can be done, and I never liked the idea of "giving up" on certain states. What makes Alaska red probably isn't the same thing that makes Alabama red - so we can focus on one of these issues, and send the GOP into a panic mode in a state they previously took for granted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Chasing the opportunities of the ephemeral present is killing this party
It's why the Republicans are able to sucker us time and again into arguing the social issue debates they want to have--we have to do more than respond to the opportunities of the moment, we have to build new opportunities for ourselves, and out of nothing if that's all we have. Luckily we have a great deal more than nothing in some red states--and even more luckily we have a DNC chair who recognizes it. Building Democratic party structure is not a two week flood of money to one targeted district/state during an election year, it's a patient nurturing of infrastructure and political feeling on the local level. Dean's strategy does this. May he still be in the job to appreciate the results, and may a future Democratic congressperson from one of these "strategically important" areas prove how wrong you are a few years down the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The thing is, Dean's work isn't done.
Party building will continue for another two years without a pause. Hopefully with even better results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Shorter WEBDB: I don't care WHAT the results were - Dean's strat still sucks. lol!
Talk about willful disconnection from reality... All to avoid admitting being mistaken - sheesh - You're a good American!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I agree that just because we won doesn't mean Dean is doing a good job
Correlation isn't causation, but I think I could argue that Dean's policies will do us more cumulative good than Terry McAuliffe's ever did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. (shrug) I never said, implied, or even suggested that correlation...
... was causation. But aside from the fact that your comments bear no relevance to mine, they're lovely.

And in any case, while correlation doesn't imply causation, it DOES imply not-coincidence. Which is all that's relevant here. Although why you thought it was interesting to introduce the concept of correlation at all in an environment containing only one data point escapes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. You can't easily define the causes of something so complex as an election
Edited on Mon Nov-13-06 12:10 AM by jpgray
So just because we won, that doesn't in itself guarantee Dean is doing a good job. Our victory certainly doesn't hurt his reputation, naturally. :D I think he's doing a great job, in case that wasn't evident in the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I don't recall attempting to "define the causes of" yadayadayada...
But thanks for the warning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. You were laughing at WEB because he thought Dean "sucked" despite the win
Edited on Mon Nov-13-06 12:21 AM by jpgray
I thought I'd point out to you that the -win- doesn't by itself prove that Dean doesn't "suck." You were treating WEB's opinion as ridiculous on its face when it isn't. I don't agree with him, but he doesn't deserve to be laughed at as if he's not making any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. LOL, we have a new Dem Rep from Kansas
that makes two Dems from Kansas in the House.

The two Dems are incumbent Dem Dennis Moore and our new Rep. Nancy Boyda. Nancy got all kinds of money back in 2004. She lost by 15%. This time around she was ignored by the DCCC until the last two weeks when polls showed she had a chance to win. She ran a grassroots campaign that started with the same Deaniacs that helped her out in 2004. The difference this time was support from the DNC in the form of walking lists and canvassing. The early canvassing (I started in the spring and worked throughout the summer) helped identify people who were willing to put up signs, make phone calls and volunteer. We got people signed up to walk their neighborhoods and, in some cases, other areas. That's what made the difference around here. By the time Ryun's (Boyda's five-time incumbent opponent) corruption (money from ARMPAC, a sweetheart house deal from Abramoff/DeLay associates, denying knowing Foley while throwing a block party with him) came out people knew Nancy's name either from her earlier run or from canvassing.

As someone who worked on the ground, I know what a difference Dean's strategy made here in Kansas. By the time the DCCC stepped in Nancy was up in the polls and gaining steam. The DCCC only began running commercials when it was announced that Bush would be stumping here for her opponent. And then, they didn't consult Boyda's campaign or coordinate their ads. They just started running them. Boyda won her seat because of the work we Kansans put into and because she's was a good candidate. And the resason so many Kansans got involved was because they were asked to participate thanks to the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. The DLC Ran The DNC For 12 Years
and we got our clocks cleaned every time.

An actual Democrat ran things this time, and we ended up at the high end of reasonable expectations.

I'd look into Occam's Razor if I were you. Very useful stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
27. Do you realize that Canada and Britain asked Dean to teach them his tactics?
Edited on Mon Nov-13-06 01:06 AM by w4rma
They did not ask Rahm Emmanuel to teach them. There is a reason that they asked Dean and it's because his strategy and tactics are cutting edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. That "Targeted State Strategy" is RW BS. Every voter deserves for the
party to represent and ask for their vote. Your sentiment is why the Texas Democratic Party sabotaged several good candidates.

Running our elections on the corrupt corporate model is what gave us crooked BBV.

I call BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
33. Do not underestimate the value of forcing the RNC to spread its efforts, too
If Dems can force the republicans to divert resources defending their "strengths," they might just have less to use in attacking Dems. A lot of these incumbents win because no one bothers to seriously challenge them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
50. I think your understanding of what Dean's "strategy" was is
exrtremely flawed.

You might want to give a listen to this (I think you'll have to dig for the link -- it used to be on c-span's home page): http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2943846

It's Dean's appearance on Wed or Thurs last week at the National Press club, and it was very, very interesting.

I submit that given the FACT that not one single Dem lost their seat in this election, and the gains we picked up were in large part in complete surprise areas (seats kept becoming "competitive" that hadn't been before), what Dean ended up doing was quite the oppose of what you believe: he made the Dem party competitive in places we'd not had a prayer of being before, which "just happened" to coincide with an incredible wave of total revulstion at all things Bush and Reublican. And that's Dean's genius: he's prescient. He is most often 1 or more years ahead of everyone else. In this case, I doubt he could have foreseen or articulated WHY, but he knew in his heart that the right thing to do was build the party in all 50 states from the ground up. He gambled big (altho IMO building party infrastructure where none exists is hardly a "gabme") -- and won big.

I think Indiana is a perfect example. Worth watching

and here's a Salon article: http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/11/10/dean_dems/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
volstork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dean helped put us in the majority--
I'd say that is pretty good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mykpart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. Dean impressed me when he said
"It's a sign of respect to ask someone for their vote." The party has ignored us in TX for so long - I think Dean might even turn TX back into the state of Sam Rayburn & Lyndon Johnson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HaggardsMethDealer Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hell yes!
The Democrats TRIED doing it the other way, with just pouring money into battleground areas and neglecting the rest of the country and it DIDNT WORK.

This isn't a 2 year process. It's a 15-20 year process. He is laying the groundwork, and doing the hard work of building this beast from the ground up. Just swooping in at the last minute and being Bush-lite in battleground areas destroyed the Democratic Party and was just spreading the red state mentality. By going into the red states and throwing down the gauntlet, you get respect and you plant seeds that will one day be harvested.

It is exactly what the right wing did to become as successful as they were, and Im glad that these DLC CLOWNS were proven wrong in this election.

We need MORE of Dean's strategy, and more face to face meetups everywhere in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes! Nicely put, and welcome to DU
Edited on Mon Nov-13-06 12:07 AM by jpgray
Republicans have poured billions via thinktanks and advocacy groups into creating a political atmosphere to guarantee victories for -their- party. The Democrats in recent times have far too often attempted not to create their own political atmosphere, but simply played by the rules the GOP worked so hard to set down. And it shouldn't be a surprise that this never works, because those rules were laid down to ensure GOP victories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. When we write off whole regions of the country, the Repugs don't have to spend a dime there
and they can instead target all their resources at our areas of strength. Then when they make inroads in our strong spots, we're dead and out of options. John Kerry said early on in '04, Dems can win without the South. That was a big mistake, IMHO. I say Dean has it right. We can and we did win all across the country. I hope he continues to build on the nationwide momentum he's helped create.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. After he's finished giving advice to the UK labor party could you send him


up here so we can get rid of Stephen Harper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
45. He IS coming to Canada!
He is the keynote speaker at the Liberal Convention in December because his 50 State Strategy is something the Libs need to rebuild their grassroots. The NDP should look at this strategy as well, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. C'mon People!!! K&R This!!!
Let's show the Clintons, their proxies, andd their DU lurkers that trying to destroy Dean is a BAD IDEA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalloway Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. Bravo, K&R !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. Dean for President
:bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
38. Hey, I'd vote for him.....
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
23. Dean is aware and on top of the republican slime & voting machine manipulations.
Edited on Mon Nov-13-06 01:03 AM by GreenTea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
24. I voted yes
Because I couldn't find an option for FUCK, YEAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
25. We've got both houses of Congress.
While that's not entirely due to Dean, it's got to be at least partly his doing. So I'm mightily pleased with his job so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. I became a Dem when Dean took over the DNC! I will leave if he's forced out!
Edited on Mon Nov-13-06 01:04 AM by calipendence
Pure and simple! I'm VERY tired of this DLC BS posturing about Dean! Dean needs to be given more power to build the Dem's future strategies!

The only thing I wish we'd tried was to have someone be in the Senate race in Indiana! As many congressional seats that turned over there, I wonder if such a tide could have helped us win the senate seat there too, and that would have freed us from dependence on Lieberman's loyalty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmboxer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
29. Extremely Satisfied!!!!!!!
Dean made a huge difference!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moloch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
32. Carville=sour grapes...
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
34. Dean is the Eric Clapton of DNC chairs, he fucking JAMS !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
35. results are what matter . . . and Dean gets results . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
36. Dean is making the Democratic party relevant again.
If we Democrats don't go for every open elected office we're stupid. The 50-state strategy is the only strategy that will further our party. Target marketing is not a party strategy, it's a low-level tactic. It won't strengthen and build the party.

The Democratic presence must be felt in every state, county, city, township and precinct in the country. Every office matters, from president to district attorney to dogcatcher. Small-time positions are where most of the real work gets done anyway. It's also where candidates are discovered and developed to run for higher office.

The 50-state strategy gives Dems another advantage by giving us more eyes and ears on the ground. It's important to know about daily life in Bozeman, MT, not just in Chicago and NY. If we know what matters to most Americans, we can do the greatest good for the greatest number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
37. absolutely satisfied
keep Dean onboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalloway Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
39. We need to vote with our dollars, not just our mouse
I'm going to double my democracy bond today to show the Dems who I am fully behind: Dr. Dean!!

Will you join me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
41. No! I HATE the idea that we WON both House and Senate!
Just when I'd gotten comfortable with the idea that Democrats were perennial losers along comes this guy Dean and changes it all.

Shame on you, Doctor Dean. Now the Democrats are actually going to have to DO SOMETHING.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
42. I wish he would take a strong stance on impeachment, but, Hey,
nobodys perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. That isn't his job. Once the investigations start, they will be hard to stop
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #44
53. I do hope that you are right and that a groundswell of outcries will
eject the toxic duo of Bush/Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
43. It worked
so I'm happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
46. you forgot the choice "abso-fucking-lutely.
But I just chose "yes" in its absence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
47. Hell yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogmi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
48. I was dissapointed by Carville.
He has always been fun to watch. He is a bulldog. I love to see him get his teeth into republicans. To see him express his views about the performance of Dean was at the least disheartening. Mr. Dean is bringing this party back to the people. His strategy is brilliant and will pay dividends in 08 if we allow him to continue it. I think we should come up with a DU thankyou to Mr. Dean as we did for Helen Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
49. his fifty state strategy worked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
51. Well said - Dean went out to ALL states and REBUILT many party infrastructures.
He didn't stay in DC and raise money while giving up in 2002 and 2004 like TerryMac - - after 2000 we were promised a MORE secure election process, and instead we got a WORSE one and a collapsed party infrastructure in crucial red and swing states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
52. Dean 50 State Strategy isn't just great for Dems
It's great for America. Rethugs now can't take the South and midwest for granted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
54. He says what he means, and means what he says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
55. Dean is the guy!
And this thread needs to be kicked up again.

Keep it in view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC