Anybody want to attempt to analyze this person?

[ck4829]

From the hate mailbag:

From: "paulo wilson" <----------.NET>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:14:18 -0400
Subject: fredom

where is the free speech ?where is the fredom of expression ? by change by pression ! the abc series to tell the story the way clinton likes to hear . its a shame . and mr .. bush the one that you guys bash ! and blame ! from an hurricane or to protect the americans citizens from terrorrists ,that never been confront by your hero ! that one that make decisions base on pool > by pool .pw

[kestrel91316]

1. This is PW's brain on drugs.

[alittlelark]

2. A sad case of PUI.

Likely a combination of meth, cheap beer, and general stupidity.

[FairVotes4all]

3. Person? I dont think thats a person.

[Autonomy]

4. Why do these rightwing nutjobs

put a space between their words and punctuation? Riddle me that . ? ?

[Kelly Rupert]

5. I'm pretty sure that's non-native English there.

Translated into English, I'd render that:

"Where is your "free speech" now? Where is your "freedom of expression" now? Now that you have pressured ABC into changing its 9/11 series so as not to offend Mr. Clinton's delicate ears, I find your hypocrisy shameful.

Moreover, I believe you are unfair to Mr. Bush. It is not appropriate to blame him for Hurricane Katrina, nor is it appropriate to attack him for protecting American citizens from terrorists. It may be an unpopular decision for him to defend us so aggressively, but after all, Mr. Clinton based his decisions on polls, and this weak form of leadership was incapable of confronting terrorism in any meaningful fashion. Mr. Bush's tendency to do unpopular things that he believes are in America's best interest makes him a superior president."

[Tellurian]

11. The question begs. What language are you translating?

Too many brewskis?

[Kelly Rupert]

13. Freeper.

I was a neocon once, mind you. I learned their lingo.

[durrrty libby]

17. A former neocon? Do tell, cause I don't get them

And welcome to DU

:hi:

[Kelly Rupert]

23. I was a neocon until the invade-Iraq faction won out.

I thought Iraq was absolutely the wrong idea. I thought terrorism in general was just a distraction from the US-China long-term power struggle, and I didn't think the invasion of Iraq would end well. I was actually a green neocon, if that makes sense--I wanted to raise the gas tax, switch our cars to ethanol, and our power plants to nuclear. I thought that we should concentrate on developing Africa, the Pacific, and Central Asia, and use them to control their resource flow, eventually boxing in China. I thought the Mideast was just a deathtrap, and thought it was best to let the Chinese and Russians play around with it until it collapsed when oil peaked. And I was irritated when everyone thought, "Oh, Iraq will just love the f*ck out of us."

I thought, no, this will turn into Israel/Palestine, and we'll be f*cking stuck there forever. Better to concentrate on destabilizing China by encouraging dangerously rapid economic development, wedging American culture in, and pushing from the inside for a collapse. Better to concentrate on our long-term strategic rivals than on a brief distraction caused by a few insignificant terrorists. Afghanistan was okay, but only insofar is it gave us a great foothold on Central Asia, and a base from which to pressure Iran and Pakistan. Iraq, though, was stupid.

Then, as Iraq predictably fell into chaos and my intellectual heroes kept falling over themselves defending a terrible idea, I realized that they were nothing more than children drawing "and then we go here and here and here" arrows on a map. I also realized, by looking at the world reaction, that unilateralism wouldn't be accepted quite as easily as we thought. So I gave up on the whole idea.

I was always a Democrat, though. Just in the aggressive-foreign-policy, social-liberal, tax-the-rich Kennedy model. You know, that golden boy who made nuclear brinksmanship a hobby ;)

[KT2000]

27. Question about China

Do you really want the collapse of China?
We have become dependent upon them for our consumer goods (the rapid economic development?) now.
Wouldn't destabalizing China result is major problems for the US?

I really think we have already been outfoxed by China. I don't believe there is anyone in our government tracking the items we are completely dependent upon China for in this country. Imagine if they said they would no longer ship lightbulbs.

[Kelly Rupert]

28. Well, the theory was,

you can just knock down governments and prop 'em back up again like nothin'. Like, what would happen with China was roughly:
1. Rapid expansion causes upper class to form, causing jealousy among lower class.
2. Chinese have built too many buildings before they're sold and invested too many millions on credit.
-the above have happened so far-
3. Chinese economy slows, immediately collapses.
4. Chinese peasants get laid off, and angry.
5. Mass rebellion. CPC loses "mandate of heaven," however you wanna call it. The Chinese populace has a long history of knocking off governments when things go sour, and right now protests are at astronomical level (55k demonstrations per year, actually). Isn't too hard to think that with a bit of that ol' CIA magic, things topple over.
6. US intervenes to preserve stability, prevent nukes from getting loose, etc. We can't have a civil war in China, can we?
7. We help the Chinese write up a new Constitution. Say hello to a new, free, democratic, free-market, friendly China!



Note: your results may vary.

[KT2000]

32. I see what you are saying

Thanks for explaining what you meant.

I do believe that China will be the next world power. They have planned very strategically to link their economy to ours - and we are the dependent ones by virtue of their holdings in our treasury bonds and consumer goods. We may have the upper hand in weapons but how smart would it be for us to bomb what are essentially manufacturing sites (many located in and around Beijing)that keep us going? My guess is their takeover will be nuke-free.

When it was discovered recently that China has been trying to disable our satellites with lasers, there was not a peep from this administration.

Example: I recall watching a news story before the Iraq war. The techs were testing their electrical equipment before deploying, using a state of the art meter - that is now made in China.

But - who knows?!?

[Kelly Rupert]

35. Oh, no doubt. China's doing well for itself.

If you want to get really scared, look at who they're talking to. They're making contingencies for a trade war. They've got long-term deals locked up with a few Central Asian nations (I think they got one with Kazakhstan when I was in Beijing last summer), they've made real inroads with Indonesia--they're looking to keep shipping lanes open and energy supplies constant.

We're looking to weaponize space, as are the Chinese. I'd give us the advantage there. Of course, if we all lose our satellites, that's a net gain for China in the unlikely event of a war between Taiwan and China. No worries there; we'll have an insurmountable conventional advantage for two decades minimum.

Any war we fight with China will be unconventional, and probably really "interesting." I'm looking forward to electronic/information warfare, unconventional use of conventional arms, and trade/market manipulation. Two superpowers fighting in the age of information, air power, and capital? The possibilities of creative resource denial are endless.

[Tellurian]

36. Hmmm...yes, China financing the Iraq War is key...

and a deeply concerning element for the US balancing act.

China is the Pale Horse!

[Tellurian]

34. hahaha!

If you say so!

and welcome to DU, BTW!

:toast:

[Liberal Jesus Freak]

16. Nicely done!

Have you always worked for the UN? :)

[rhiannon55]

18. Wow, you translated that guy's post REALLY well

almost like you were also stating your own opinions on the subject...

Er...welcome to DU. :eyes:

[Kelly Rupert]

24. Bush is certainly the second-best President we've had

since Clinton, coming in second place to a fly which temporarily landed on his chair in the Oval Office in June 2003.

[MadMaddie]

25. Oh that's rich..bwaw...haw...

Welcome to DU!!:hi:

[EstimatedProphet]

29. Tell the truth. You wrote the original, didn't you?

C'mon, fess up.

[Kelly Rupert]

33. No, I only *wish* I could write that level of gibberish.

[On the Road]

38. You, Kelly, are a Very Good Translator

[MoonRiver]

6. Dementia?

No, probably inbreeding.

[Island Blue]

7. A Freeper without a "shift" key? n/t

[atommom]

8. Personally, I think that guy is screwn, whatever he's trying to say. nt

[Viva_La_Revolution]

9. english is not their first language

and they are an idiot.

[Wiley50]

14. That's what I got from it too n/t

[H2O Man]

10. Jerk. n/t

[MiaCulpa]

12. The lack of adequate mental healthcare in the nation is a crime.

Perhaps now that we Dems control congress, we can get something done with healthcare. Just tragic.

[Sal Minella]

15. Borat? You back from Australia already, dude???

[SheWhoMustBeObeyed]

19. It crossed my mind that it may be Lazlo Toth

aka Father Guido Sarducci, aka Don Novello. As Toth, Novello wrote many phony nutjob letters to politicians, celebrities and corporations which he compiled - along with replies - in several very funny books. But even at his most disjointed he was not as weird as Paulo.

One of my favorite Tothisms, in a letter to McDonalds: "I see where you're up to 10 Billion hamburgers sold. How many more do you have to go?"

[Warpy]

20. ESL. Probably an Asian language as the first language

given the lack of verb tenses plus the odd sentence structure.

[TexasLawyer]

21. brain damage

sad

[Arkansas Granny]

22. This reminds me of some of the spam I receive, but most of them

are trying to get me to buy some sort of male enhancement product.

[Ms. Clio]

26. it's Chad the terrorist freeper

The exclamation points are part of his distinctive "style."

[tinfoil tiaras]

30. what in the hell?

is that in english? I can't make sense out of that at all. That person had to have been on something while writing that email...

[distantearlywarning]

31. My analysis:

Can't write basic English.

[SoCalDem]

37. by the pool, by the beautiful pool....well he tried to "Name that Tune"