Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

just heard on the Frankin Show.. Bu$h is writing signing statements on other presidents bills..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:30 PM
Original message
just heard on the Frankin Show.. Bu$h is writing signing statements on other presidents bills..
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can he do that?
Edited on Tue Nov-14-06 01:35 PM by Whoa_Nelly
Is that allowed? :shrug:

on edit:
per the Constitution--The president either signs a bill into law or vetoes it...there is nothing about the allowance of signing statements.

Is the signing statement action a total Bush only thing, or have other presidents done this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sure, others have done it as a type of protest
Edited on Tue Nov-14-06 01:37 PM by Kagemusha
and a declaration they're going to do such and such because they view a law as beyond constitutional bounds, so unless a court makes them they're not going to follow what seems obviously wrong to do. Part of the tension of government. Certainly, if a Congress cared enough, a President could be impeached for such an act, right there, but usually it gets fought out in the courts.

What Bush's doing is just on another scale though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Surprised he hasn't put a signing statement on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights
What kind of precedent is this? Future Presidents get to interpret laws and legislative intent? Depending on their crimes, seems like this is a self-serving vehicle which the Courts and Congress ought to be challenging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Presidents always get to interpret laws. But your last part's correct..
This IS a self-serving vehicle which the courts and Congress ought to be challenging. Absolutely. I strongly support such challenges.

I think the big problem is when the Executive moves from interpreting vague law to deciding a crystal clear law in plain English somehow shouldn't have the force of law the Constitution allows Congress to impose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Signing Statements are a CYA
All laws need to be interpreted by the Executive. Signing statements are just CYAs saying how they intend to interpret them - in this case, they interpret them as simply not affecting the President because of The Smirk's magical wartime powers.

As a legal nicety, it's better to interpret before-the-fact than after-the-fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I want to see that report
amazing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. This Is Why He Must Be Impeached ASAP
This is nothing less than dictatorship. Since, The Smirk claims, he is not bound by the Courts nor Legislature, the only remedy is impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's what I've been saying
Changing the make-up(think Maybelline)don't mean squat to this shyster,
shit he's been governing by presidential fiat WITH a repug congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. AND Al Franken just received two threatening letters
My brother emailed me a copy of the newspaper article that said that Al Franken at Air America just got two letters with white powder, nothing lethal, that they are checking. Maybe it is the same guy. I think this type of stuff should be caught right away.

And I think that the democrats should ask for someone to look into the fact that the FCC is trying to cover belly buttons and is allowing people like Ann Coulter, the Fox Group and Pat Robertson call for people to shoot and kill people. Isn't that a violation of the FCC code. Can't their license to broadcase be pulled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Can you post the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Found this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Agreed.
These maniacs need to have their wings clipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here's a link I found
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. WTF
From the article:

"All of the previous U.S. presidents combined have issued only approximately 600" while the chimporer has alone done 800!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's like an animal that has to mark everything with its urine.
He has skunked up everything he's had contact with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. We call him ignorant. Arrogant. Pompous. In the end he has
NO RESPECT OR APPRECIATION for anything other than himself and his friends. And he doesn't know enough to discriminate between being used and being utterly selfish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC