Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:26 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Were you expecting the Republicans to retain control of Congress this year? |
reichstag911
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
1. At least the Senate. {nt} |
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. my comment too. the house, yes. Senate, that was a stretch. |
bertha katzenengel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Senate - yes. House - no. n/t |
karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I was sure about the House but not at all for the Senate. |
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I expected them to narrowly retain control |
|
I am normally a pessimist, so I was pleasantly surprised. I'll admit winning the House was not a shocker to me, but the senate was.
|
ivycat
(70 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I expected them to lose the House, but keep the Senate
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:30 PM
Original message |
I thought we had a good chance of taking the whole thing. |
|
It didn't make sense a tsunami was being predicted in the House, but the Senate was supposedly iffy.
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
7. The Senate, certainly. That result was very surprising to me. nm |
warrens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
8. My prediction was 28 house seats, 5 in the senate |
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Rosemary2205
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I'm still surprised turnout overwhelmed the Diebold factor. |
|
I figure the diebold factor at 10-20% minimum. It's my guess in all those near 50/50 races the R's probably actually lost by a landslide.
|
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. I think our biggest enemy isn't Diebold as much as voter suppression. |
|
There has been a purge for the last several years of voter registrations as well as a huge misinformation campaign that worked to delegitmizehundreds of thousand(maybe millions) of Democratic votes. I do believe our turnout indeed over came that factor.
|
reichstag911
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
20. I don't know about that. |
|
At least when there's voter suppression, there's an evidence trail. With the machine hacking, it can be done so there is none.
|
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. Well registration purgin is done on databses |
|
There is no evidence of it.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I hoped we'd win the Senate seats we did, figured we'd take about 26 in the House. People were ready for change. I'm actually disappointed we didn't do better, there's still a lot of delusional people out there.
|
Eugene
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Of the Senate but not the House. |
|
Karl Rove's bravado did have me worried he had something up his sleeve.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I still am giddy that we took back the Senate . . .did not expect it EOM |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
15. House - expected Senate-unexpected |
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I definitely thought they'd keep the Senate, and I was very cautiously optimistic on the House. |
|
I've become extremely cynical over the last few years.
|
Ioo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Congress is two parts... so the question is loaded... |
|
NO on the house. YES on Senate
|
Chorophyll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I expected them to keep the Senate. |
|
Here's a woo-hoo for our Democratic Week-aversary: :woohoo:
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Until about three months ago, Yes. |
tblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I thought they'd actually GAIN seats in both houses. Thru vote suppression & e-voting. |
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Yes, I thought the nightmare |
|
of them would never end in my life time. :-( THANK God I wasz wrong! :bounce:
|
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-14-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Yep. And I posted we would take 6 Senate seats, too. |
|
I thought the margins would be better for us and more along what later the exit polls said. But I'm very happy with what we won. Very happy.
There were too many life-long, die-hard Republicans who were voicing anger and too many Independents saying they were voting Democratic.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message |