Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney & Libby request

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:05 PM
Original message
Cheney & Libby request
the Wilson's civil suit be dismissed.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15720396/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Suh-prise, suh-prise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I'm shocked.
And here the VP seemed so intent on helping uncover the truth about this scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. The work of Coulter and the other elves in getting Clinton/Jones to court
Wouldn't it be such irony if the precedent set there gets Cheney sued and on the witness stand, under oath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. They "request" - bah! I hope that request goes right in file # 13 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I request subpeona power.
Granted.:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. oooooh.... They are Nervous (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Poor Libby.
You shouldn't have lied to take one for the "team".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm Expecting To Win The Lottery Tonight
My chances are better.

The pubs made a huge mistake when they did the Paula Jones thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yep.
Chickens coming home to roost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. But Doesn't It Just Make You Smile?
Just enhances the upcoming holidays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I grew up
on a farm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh, of course. On the grounds of it being frivolous.
And his wife is just fine! Why I even saw her pretty photograph in Vanity Fair! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ha!
You know, it's funny: the OVP cheerleaders have been saying for years that Plame wasn't a NOC, and the Agency wasn't damaged. Then, in the Libby criminal trial, Team Libby demands that no mention should be made of Plame's status in the Agency, or of the harm done by exposing her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I don't think we're in any danger of a pardon anytime soon.
That's why we're seeing this pathetic manuevering. If Dumbya actually did try to pardon Libby on the eve of the criminal trial, I think Conyers and Pelosi would switch from good cop tactics to bad cop tactics. Something else would be on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. No pardon
is coming in the criminal trial.

I do not think the civil case will get tossed on this motion. We should be backing the Wilson case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I am. Or have, however one wants to put it.
Thanks for this thread. The wheels of justice still turn. They will continue to try and squeeze free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I think that
it's a good one to keep supporting.

I have a number of motions from the criminal case that I have been going to post essays on. I wanted to wait until a little more time after the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Is NOW "a little more time" (I hope, I hope)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I plan to say
something else about the war and the need to push for the Congressional investigations that will lead to VP Cheney's impeachment. And that is closely related. Then it's back to Plame, as I think that between the holidays we will have some interesting news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. A follow up to your article "On Impeachment"?
I printed that out for slow digestion and keeping at hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I've had two
surveys on DU:GD, asking people their opinions on what US policy should be in regard to Iraq, and who might best represent DUers' opinions. I will do a third in that little series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Yes, I've read them.
Thought provoking. It caused a DUer pal and I while talking on the phone to mentally fire all of the members of the so-called 'Blue Ribbon' Baker Iraq Study Group and fill them with our own choices. A group of experienced military leaders, peacemakers and statesmen. The likes of General Clark, General Zinni, Jimmy Carter, Secretary Madeline Albright, Ambassador Joe Wilson, etc.

I read all the H20man threads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I think that
it should be evident to those who might be hesitant to advocate for the investigations that lead to impeachment that with the executive branch being turned over to Baker & Co., plans to end the war will be frustrated .... without making major changes in Washington. Impeachment is the major change that is required. Otherwise, in 2008, we'll have the issue of how to deal with the war in Iraq being a presidential campaign issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. "Let all of the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out."
They have hatched. Time to see all of the poisons for what they are, expose them, admit them and cleanse them away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. "Blue-Ribbon"
:puke: :puke: :puke:

Says who? I'm sick of these assholes projecting their bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. 'Blue-Ribbon, Sparkly-Bullshit, Magic-Dust, Fancy-Glitter' Panel.
What are ya, cynical or sumthin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Just sick of the "fairy-dust" bullshit...
B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I look forward to the essays
and I will continue to support the Wilson Trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Now That's Going To Be A Trick!
Wants classified info revealed, but not her status. If I Liar Libby gets to use clasified docs, does FitzG.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. That's a good question.
Here's my best answer: Mr. Fitzgerald doesn't really need to. He will convict Libby by keeping it simple. And Libby will convict himself by trying to make it complicated. (grin)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. I request a new pony and an unlimited shopping spree at Tiffany, myself
Somehow, though, I don't think I'm going to get it. Neither will Crashcart and Scooter.

Hey! Neocons! Remember Paula Jones? Remember the Clenis? Remember your insistence that NOBODY was above the law?

EAT IT! :woohoo: :woohoo: :party:
Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yeah, this is about "the rule of law" you know, because you "lied"
karma, karma, karma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hmmm, the administration's comedy duo
are warming up for the Gong Show. Request denied! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'm wondering if we will now find out what happened re: Fitzgerald vs Rove?
Edited on Tue Nov-14-06 09:13 PM by gordianot
Was Fitzgerald really ready to indict Rove and was the indictment blocked? Curious minds want to know.

Maybe Rove is not worth saving anymore now that the rats are scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
50. That is the piece I want to know, how did Rove get off the hook?
Fitz was ready to indict it looked like to me,
and Rove pulled a fast one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Don't Want To Start A Firestorm
But have always believed there was and is a deal in the works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. When Rove left that hearing he looked very relieved but guilty.
His attorney was grinning like a cat from ear to ear.
So proud of himself.

I believe there was some fast foot work, but I can't figure out the deal.

Do you mean Rove did a little singing? Fitz was after bigger fish then Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. I've used this
example before, though for some time I quoted it out of an earlier book. It holds true in most serious investigations. I would suggest that it does here, too.

"He gave me a little lecture about breaking a conspiracy like Watergate. 'You build convincingly from the outer edges in, you get ten times the evidence you need against the Hunts and Liddys. They feel helplessly finished -- they might not talk right away, but the grip is on them. Then you move up and do the same thing at the next level. If you shoot too high and miss, then everyone feels more secure. Lawyers work this way. I'm sure smart reporters must too'."
--The Secret Man; Bob Woodward; Simon & Schuster;2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Yes, the grip is on them.
Rove walked, for now.
But he was gripped for sure,
and so were the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usaftmo Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Can we get those 2 losers...
to join Abramoff in jail starting tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. Shooter and Scooter are not above the law.
Their claims of immunity seem desperate at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Cheney's might
have had merit before Clinton's experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Indeed
We won't see the Vice-President hauled off to testify under oath anytime soon, ala WJC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Well, we might.
Around May, '07.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. I sure as hell hope so.
The date seems about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. The 10/30/06 filings in the criminal case
read like they were written by Karen Hughes, not high-priced legal minds.

Whereas this sounds like the work of modestly talented high school debaters:

Vice President Cheney's attorneys argue that the suit should be dismissed on various grounds including that, "the Vice President is entitled to qualified immunity," and that Cheney is "absolutely immune from suits for civil damages."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Not anymore, not after what they did to Clinton. Karma, Karma,
Karma...gotta love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. What I enjoyed most
about those filings, was that they put on paper every argument Fitz used against Scooter's ridiculous requests along the way, but it was from Libby's petulant lawyer children, so the whole thing read like, "Oh yeah? You said we can't talk about this?? Fine then! But you can't either!!"

That's what the best lawyers sound like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
37. The dreaded "tort law"
rears its ugly head. There's nothing Cheney hates more than tort law -- except maybe tort lawyers.

I thought the Wilsons filed within the specified time and that's why the suit happened when it did. Is Cheney claiming something else (Shock! Horror!) or does he have a legal argument there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Would It Have Anything To Do With Adding Armitage
at a later date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I went back and looked at the filing
Edited on Tue Nov-14-06 10:57 PM by Patsy Stone
and it says that Armitage was named in the original suit, but as a John Doe.

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/060913_wilson-plame_suit.pdf

I can't believe their lawyers would let them file a complaint which would jeopardize the case, so I don't know.

But you're right in the sense that if there was even an inkling of a chance it would stick, Cheney might try arguing that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I Forgot About John Does
1-10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
45. Request denied. Sit down, Mr. Vice President.
Any more outbursts like this and I'll have to clear the courtroom.

(Well, I can dream, can't I?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. That's a
good dream!

I believe that VP Cheney fears being deposed .... in every sense of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
52. Isn't this
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 08:38 AM by DoYouEverWonder
standard operating procedure for a case like this, leading up to trial? The lawyers know it's a joke but would be negligent if they didn't at least try. I'm sure there will be many more distraction and ways to waste time between now and the trial.

Glad to see Libby's memory expert, failed the memory test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. Yep.
Part of the ritual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. And part of the ritual
is to grind you down, until you give up.

Anyone whose ever been through a major court case, understands that after 5-10 years, an out of court settlement starts to look like a good idea, no matter how strong a case you have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. The Office of the
President is probably not looking forward to this case starting up in early '07.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #55
63. With at least 4 major ongoing investigations
and a Democratic Congress, I'm sure Paraguay is looking real good right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
58. who is the judge here?
who will decide on this motion to dismiss? Its in federal district court I assume, in DC?
If he/she grants the motion, than Wilsons can appeal, but then your talking a pause in the action-
I know from having appealed a judge's decision to grant the Motion to dismiss my lawsuit, which I appealed but it was almost a year before anything happened.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. Good question.
The answer is interesting: it's US District Judge John D. Bates. He is a highly intelligent fellow, though his connections are with the extreme right. In 2005, Rehnquist appointed him to a position on judicial conference on court administration and case management. This year, Roberts put him on the FISA review court.

He has a curious past. Some of it is cause for real concern. He was the one who dismissed the GAO suit to get VP Cheney's records on the energy task force. Also of concern was his service as deputy counsel on the Whitewater investigation.

A few possible good points include his rulings in favor of some sensitive FOI requests; his '04 ruling that rejected the Bush-Cheney attempts to deny habeas corpus rights to US citizens in foreign lands; and that when the federal government attempted to keep his appointment to the FISA court a secret, he came forward with the information.

I think he attempts to stick to the Constitution. The Scientists Project on Government Secrecy report on him includes this quote:

"The Court concludes that a citizen cannot be so easily separated from his constitutional rights."
-- Judge Bates; Abu Ali v. John Ashcroft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. Hmm, interesting so there's no telling really which way he could
go on this. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. Right.
He tends to be very conservative. There are times when very conservative is good -- and that is when judges' rule according to the Constitution. He has shown a willingness to do so, even when it means ruling against his fellow right-wingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Well, I hope he does right by the US Constitution and the
American people. We'll see huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. It will be interesting
to see his first ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. When is it expected? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. Libby's attorneys
filed three documents on 11-16. They are: {1} Libby's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (2 pages); his Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Support of his Motion (37 pages); anda Proposed Order (2 pages).

I will say that Libby's legal team has produced a high quality document in their memo in support. They want to, in the words of Barney Fife, "nip it in the bud."

It will be interesting to see Chemerinsky's response to the issues raised by Jeffress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
60. Delay, obfuscate, deny, attack. Show complete defiance. All the way to the ground.
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 08:27 PM by byronius
That is what they do. These are a type of ideoloque that resists until the bitter end -- very Hussein-like, actually. It will be an excellent test of the largest and most important routines in the national code, so to speak. Can they -- or can't they?

We may not be able to deal properly with this as a nation. Bad information abounds. Good elections aside -- I fear these men. Personally. 'What's that flash?' Hopefully in this version of the movie the heroic Secret Service agent rescues us from the evil Penguin, who has disguised himself as the Vice President of the United States.

Where is the Batman? Ah. H2O Man now wears the cowl.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
61. Cheney figured better go for it now, then after January...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
64. FlDem5 requests
for Jeb Bush to resign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC