Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CALLING NANCY PELOSI-The People's Case for Impeaching Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:52 AM
Original message
CALLING NANCY PELOSI-The People's Case for Impeaching Bush
CALLING NANCY PELOSI
The People's Case for Impeaching Bush

By Elizabeth Holtzman | November 15, 2006

THE ABC'S OF BUSH'S JOB—Under the Constitution, the president has three central obligations.

First, the president must "faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States." This is part of the oath of office, which is itself mandated by the Constitution.

Second, the president must "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States," also part of the oath of office. In other words, the president is required to respect the role of the Congress and the courts, as well as the fundamental liberties reserved to the citizens.

And third, the president is required "to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," an affirmative duty imposed directly by the Constitution. This presidential obligation carries great weight. Involved are two responsibilities, similar but separate: first, the president is required to "take care," or to be highly attentive, and, second, the president must see that the laws are "faithfully executed," or that the laws are fully followed. Combined, these impose a very strict burden on the president to ensure the proper implementation of the nation's laws.

.................

What is expected is that the president will uphold the Constitution and the laws and fulfill the oath of office. Carefully applying the law is a requirement for holding office. The president may not avoid, subvert, or undermine the law. Nothing excuses the president from fulfilling his constitutional obligationsnot incompetence or ignorance or lack of interest. The failure or the inability of a president to fulfill these obligations, for whatever reason, causes serious harm to democracy. Impeachment is the constitutional remedy to protect the future health of the nation.

3 pages - lots of sensible arguments:
http://www.washingtonspectator.com/articles/20061115impeachment_1.cfm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ideological and religious zealots who still support W don't give a shit about the three
central constitutional obligations of the president nor that all three central obligations have been systematically ignored/subverted. The prescribed remedy for failure to meet these three central obligations is crystal clear and the only cure. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. That's the great thing about the Constitution. It is the supreme law of the land
even if you don't believe in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Impeachment is imperative.
Get ready for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. k&r
He has proudly admitted to violating FISA, and that is surely at least as high a crime as lying under oath about a blow job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Elizabeth Holtzman knows how real Nazis influenced America
from their political home in the RW of The Republican Party and how that real Nazi influence was spread throughout our nation originating from the foundation of our national security community.

Many dynastic politically powerful families are historically linked to these real Nazis and share some of the same ideology-the Bush family is the leader in this regard. That is not an opinion, it is a fact.

They've got to GO.

Elizabeth Holtzman's testimony about The Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act HR 4007
http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/hr071498/holtzman.html

The CIA and Nazi War Criminals
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/index.htm

Nazi-US profiteers
http://www.archives.gov/research_room/holocaust_era_assets/bibliographies/trade_with_third_reich.html

How the Bush Family Wealth is Linked to the Jewish Holocaust by Toby Rogers
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/ROG309A.html

Old Nazi Networks in US (Republican RW) from the work of Russ Bellant
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/academic/political-science/fascism/bellant/bellant.pt1

Gold Fillings, Auschwitz and George Bush
http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/bushies.htm

It's time for another Bush/Nazis thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x199853

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnHov Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. hence nein-eleven
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Thanks for that
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Share it with others-these war criminals and profiteers have got to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R to the Greatest Page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. You know what?
Excuse me for being so off topic. But I would say that America is in an emergency situation.

The furthest thing from our minds should be impeachment.

I want health care, damnit!

I want to have a country where I feel like I'm at home. Not in some corporate lobby. I want to have a place where the children who are growing up to take positions in this society aren't uneducated.

Right now we are standing amidst a train wreck. I'd be willing to let the drunk conductor wander off, and even escape. There are casualties here. And I don't think we have time to waste on anything.

Of anyone, I probably hate bush at least as much, if not more. But I want to see a doctor. I want to see bright young kids. I don't want lingering sickness and impossible fees to have health care. And I certainly don't want to see another generation grow up to repeat the Fox mantras.

Bush is totally unimportant. He's got his coming, whether we spend time litigating his ass or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. What we've become meets various definitions of fascism-they've
got to go, then the priorities of we, the people, can be met. I agree that this is a "train wreck".

14 Characteristics of Fascism
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/14_Characteristics_Fascism.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm back and forth on this issue.
But you're correct. I read those characteristics when they first posted. Eyeopening. I already knew we were headed there, a long time ago.

My post assumed, and incorrectly so, that we only have so much manpower to go around. We can investigate and perform for the people simultaneously.

Actually, we have to investigate. I think the impeachment talk is all moot. Once we investigate, it's inevitable that impeachment will follow. That's why I haven't said much in any of the impeachment threads.


I am so pissed today! It's not that the high of our win has diminished. It's that we have gone through this at all. And the wasted lives and time. It's sickening. There is no way we aren't going to investigate him to the bowels of Hades.

Thanks for prodding me. I needed to get in touch with my rage again. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Most people have similar feelings-we will get OUR government back
there's so much that needs to be done after these criminals are gone...
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnHov Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. why go for the puppet when the puppeteer would be more satisfying? (Ch heinous y)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specimenfred1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's the law, it's that simple
He broke it over and over and over and he's not above it, the criminal was supposed to support and protect it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R...
"the president must "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States,"

On September 23, 2006, during a debate with Senator-elect Jon Tester (D), Senator-expelled Conrad Burns(R) in Butte, MT, said:

"He wants to weaken our families, weaken our security and to basically cut and run" from the war in Iraq, This statement by Burns was one of many in a campaign theme that presented Tester as soft on terror. Burns said he also supports programs monitoring telephone calls.

"He wants to weaken the Patriot Act," Burns also said of Tester.

Tester sought to clarify, saying:

"I don't want to weaken the Patriot Act, I want to repeal it. What it does -- it takes away your freedom ... and when you take away our freedoms, the terrorists have won!"



Tester went on to say, "With things like the Patriot Act, we'd damn well better keep our guns."

While some Democratic candidates lost races by vacillating to hedge bets and appear strong on terrorism , Tester presents the kind of guts Americans admire. Some Democratic hopefuls foolishly made excuses for their wise votes against USA Patriot Act II, which severely inhibits basic civil liberties of ALL U.S. citizens. Tester won by showing spine and offering straight-talk. Whether, left, right or center, Tester embodies the kind of representation we ALL want in D.C.

The Tester comments are even more significant because he was not running for a Senate seat in deep-blue states like Vermont or Rhode Island; he won with those words in Montana, which went for Bush by a 20 point margin (59-39) in the last presidential elections.

Remarks by Tester bring back memories of a very popular current leader, Russ Feingold (D) WI, who is the only Senator to vote against the ORIGINAL U.S.A. Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. K & R!
NGU!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. kick
:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R Impeach!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. .
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. Even though she didn't take OUR CALL this gets another kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. call waiting-a weekend kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. With people like Alberto Gonzo telling * that he's doing a fine
job upholding the constitution, I think we will have our work cut out for us?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City of Mills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. Seems vague
I don't like the use of "faith" or "faithfully" in the oath of office. Way too open to interpretation, especially in light of the questionable separation of church and state in the current administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC