Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A peek into Mitch McConnell's hidey hole

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:46 AM
Original message
A peek into Mitch McConnell's hidey hole
from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_McConnell

McConnell has raised nearly $220 million during his Senate career. Most of the money went to the campaigns of his GOP colleagues. The Lexington Herald-Ledger said that in return those collegues "have rewarded him with power". "He's completely dogged in his pursuit of money. That's his great love, above everything else," said Marshall Whitman, a former aide to Senator John McCain, R-Ariz., and a Christian Coalition lobbyist in Washington.

A six-month examination of McConnell fundraising found a significant correlation between his actions and his donors' agendas. He has supported government action to help cigarette makers, Las Vegas casinos, the pharmaceutical industry, credit card lenders, coal mine owners, and others who have given large amounts of money. McConnell has responded that he never allows money to influence him. His donors support him because they like his pro-business, conservative philosophy, he said, so it's hardly proof of corruption when he does what they want.<3>



http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/15763570.htm

Posted on Sun, Oct. 15, 2006
Price tag politics
Senator's pet issue: money and the power it buys
By John Cheves
HERALD-LEADER STAFF WRITER

WASHINGTON - In the early 1970s, Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr., a young and intense Republican lawyer, strode into the political science class he taught at the University of Louisville.

He didn't introduce himself to his students. He went straight to the chalkboard and scribbled.

"I am going to teach you the three things you need to build a political party," he said, and backed away to reveal the words: "Money, money, money."

Three decades later, the teacher has mastered the lesson like few in history.

An extraordinary political fund-raiser, Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has used his skill to put himself on the brink of a remarkable career achievement. If Republicans hold the Senate in the Nov. 7 elections, he is expected to succeed retiring Sen. Bill Frist of Tennessee as majority leader.

more...


http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0610.roth.html

The Washington Monthly, October 2006
Meet the New Boss

Quietly, Senate Republicans have already chosen
Mitch McConnell as their next leader—because
Congress just isn’t partisan enough.

By Zachary Roth & Cliff Schecter

-snip-

A recent press conference at the Capitol, on the subject of energy legislation, gave some hint of the differences between McConnell and the man he will replace. Frist—a tall, immaculately coiffed, square-jawed Tennessee surgeon—seemed almost to glow as he preened before the cameras. Behind him and a little to the side, his deputy stood staring impassively into space. With his pale complexion and gray, shapeless suit, McConnell appeared to exist in black and white. When it was his turn at the microphone, he used a dry, deliberate, and slightly monotonous speaking style to praise a colleague for his work on the bill, then quickly stepped aside.

He may not look as good as Frist, but many observers expect a more efficiently run Senate under McConnell. “I think you will not see Harry Reid run ‘Roberts Rules of Order’ circles around McConnell,” says Chuck Todd, the editor of National Journal’s Hotline, and a veteran Washington political observer. Indeed, of the few legislative successes that Frist has achieved, two of them—bills making it harder to bring class-action lawsuits and to file for bankruptcy—occurred when McConnell played a leading role. And it’s no accident that both were among the most eagerly sought items of the party’s corporate backers.

McConnell will also likely do more than Frist to help Republicans maintain control of the Senate. Some observers say they expect him to pressure certain of his colleagues with safer seats to share more of their campaign funds, with the goal of preserving or increasing the GOP majority. Already, McConnell has created a program that solicits money from top donors and sends it to candidates in the most critical races. In November 2004, it gave the maximum $10,000 to every Senate Republican incumbent facing an even remotely challenging race.

If Republicans do hold onto the Senate—and they might not—McConnell will likely have a smaller majority than Frist has enjoyed. A leader hoping to get legislation passed would probably respond by being more conciliatory toward the minority—but Republicans didn’t pick McConnell because of his talent for conciliation. “I think he’ll be more likely to pick a fight,” says the Heritage Foundation’s Darling. With a confrontational Republican leader, a narrow Senate majority, and an unpopular, lame duck president, the next two years don’t figure to see much landmark legislation passed. Instead, if the past is any guide, Majority Leader McConnell will focus only on measures that support Republican power or drive a wedge between Democrats, and will do everything possible to keep campaign dollars flowing to the GOP. But if and when that happens, don’t blame McConnell. He’ll only be doing what he was elected to do.    

-snip-

more...


For a look at key votes by McConnell over the last two years, try this WaPo link:
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000355/key-votes/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Our Dem candidate for state office spent what he was given through
small donation, 5k, took no PAC money. His repuke opponent took everything he could get his hands on, 200k. Can you guess who won?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It's ALL about the ads and the money it costs to get them aired
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 02:43 PM by SoCalDem
In a FAIR fight, your candidate's opinions and philosophies would have stood side by side with the "other" candidate's, and people could have made an informed choice.

Sadly..nothing will change until public financing is the norm..

FREE television ads , and LIMITED (and matching) print ads are the only solution.

take the MONEY out of the advertising, and you eliminate the "need" for lobbying.

A congressperson/senator/whatever who took tons of money from business, and did not "need" it for ads, would surely stick out like a sore thumb..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Is there even a remote possibility that will EVER happen? I think that all
of us, no matter our views on government would be better off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not in our lifetimes, I fear..
The people who rail about it during their campaigns, get amnesia once elected..

they are the ONLY ones who "can" do anything substantial about it, and of course it's the vehicle for THEIR election victory, so why would they actually change it once elected?

As long as they remain "unelected" they gripe about it...but have no power to change it..

Catch 22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yup, winners rarely change the rules that enabled their victories.
I'm listening to Mike Malloy at this moment. Mike just called Mitch a racist bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. His wife's doing a bang up job, too! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If Michelle Malkin married a freeper senator and got a cabinet appointment, she'd be ...
... Elaine Ciao's evil twin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateShame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. A blemish on our state
I can remember watching Jesse Helms or Phil Gramm on C-Span and various programs years ago, thinking, "how can the voters there be so stupid as to continue to re-elect these self serving pigs with no regard to the apparent signs of corruption?" Meanwhile, a sty was being built (named after the week's biggest corporate donor)in Kentucky after this pork monster. If the world were justice, local political writer and former congressional candidate James W. Moore, who vowed to take NO soft money during his run, would beat this corrupt cretin of Kentucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC