Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WATCH THE ABSCAM VIDEO: Murth Displays A High Degree of Ethics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:54 PM
Original message
WATCH THE ABSCAM VIDEO: Murth Displays A High Degree of Ethics
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 03:55 PM by berni_mccoy
I've watched the Abscam tape. You can watch it here too: http://lonestartimes.com/2006/11/14/

I listened to every statement Murtha made.

Murtha did exactly this:
1. Discussed housing prices
2. Discussed the problems of his District
3. Told the agents that they can't give him money to get legislature drafted and that is illegal
4. Told the agents that he wants to follow the law
5. Told the agents that they are free to invest in his district and that he would be appreciative of that
6. Told the agents that they don't need to spend a damned cent on this
7. Told the agents that he could speak kindly of them for investing in their business and that would work for him politically to show he is able to get business investments for his district
8. He even told them what is legal and that they are going out of bounds
9. Any sort of investments have to be dealt with legally and politically and that he needs to know details before discussing further
10. A few investments in his district will get the attention and everything has to be above board or otherwise people go to jail.
11. The people in his district will be supportive of investing companies and will want to advertise the fact and that Murtha was helpful. It's a good thing when done properly.
12. Introducing legislation is only legal when initiated by people in his district.
13. The LEGAL and ETHICAL way for a company to have legislation drafted is by investing in the district, lobbying the people of the district to initiate the laws and then Murtha can respond.
14. He gave examples of ways that this has been done successfully and unsuccessfully in the past.

There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with that.

What Murtha Didn't say:
1. He didn't take money to draft legislation
2. He didn't say he would draft legislation for investing in his district
3. He didn't guarantee the agents that they would get their legislation proposal supported by the people in his district.

Murtha was completely above board on the entire issue and educated the agents on the legal and ethical issues of lobbying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree, its nothing but sliming by association.
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 04:00 PM by Jim4Wes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Murtha is trying to bring pork to his district...at no point does
he say he will take money for his personal use.

He does mention helping particular banking friends. Now...some people with active imaginations might just think that Murtha would get a cut once his friends got a cut...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. I agree except for the pork label...
Encouraging outside investment isn't pork, getting a gubmint project is.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. What you detailed is exactly what happened...
however more idealistic people might say...."why would Murtha even want to help a bad sheik come into his district....just for money"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Were you around in the late 70s?
The economy was tanking big time. Is it wrong for Murtha to want to bring business to his district? Would this have been better if it was a French company? Canadian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I didn't say it was wrong...
I grew up in this area...(I live next to Murtha's district)...

I stated that more "idealistic" people might find it distasteful to bring in a corrupt sheik...

But I agree with you...Murtha was keen on bringing jobs to his district.

The Steel industry had collapsed...coal was on a downturn...it was a shitty time..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He's giving them the benefit of the doubt... and if someone wants to help his
district, then he is being non-discriminatory (or equal opportunity) to all investors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. and what backs up Murtha's integrity is the fact that he kept asking
for more details...and the fact that he kept stating that this was about helping his district, creating jobs..etc

I didn't hear him say anything about him asking for anyone to line his pockets personally...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. 1980?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
All this is about something from 1980???????

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It is a political...."I like the 80's" episode on VH1...
hee hee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Murtha said "god-damn" - thats it, im not supporting him!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I remember the whole thing....cuz I remember it being on the TV
all the time when I was a kid ...

Funny part is that what goes on in this video...is exactly what goes on today...but now there are lobbyists with fully time jobs trying to massage votes and promise money to districts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. he said "son of a bitch" now
Oh man, he is so evil!

:D

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. He said the F-word too... (I think he was getting frustrated with these agents)
They kept offering $50,000 in cash and he kept telling them over and over again that he can't take it and that the proper way to do it is to invest in the district and use that as a political action to get the people to support their legislative initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. apparently, he's an ethical pottymouth?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Amazing. Recommended and bookmarking
I had seen all kinds of threads about this on DUand had no idea what the truth was. I will watch this for myself later but I take your word for it.

As usual nothing happened. Nada. Zilch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. In fact, if you watch the very end, the main undercover investigator is pissed
That the mole brought him someone who is not a criminal and wasted their time. Right at 52:00, you'll see where the mole totally misled the investigator on the $50,000 issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. 15 minutes into it
"I want this guy to spend money in my district, Im delighted to do business with the guy and do any god-damned thing I can within bounds and I dont get myself in jail.... I have to know the details ... and then I can check into it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. 19 minutes
"What I gotta know is EXACTLY what you have in mind"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thanks for watching it.
There are too many people at DU willing to pass judgement on Murtha without knowing the full story or even just watching the tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. i have doubts about Murtha but it has nothing to do with this issue
He quite frankly is hawk and a conservative Democrat. 2 years ago he might even have been labeled an Dino. He just saw the reality of Iraq earlier and spoke up. He still loves his military thou.

Would he fight for the environment? Would he fight for National Health Care? Does he believe we are responsible for Global Warming? Does he believe the middle class is being fucked economically? Does he believe in the Patriot Act?

These are the real issues that I am concerned about. We all know where he stands in regards to Iraq, what about everything else?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I can't answer those questions, but one question I can answer after watching this
He *will* fight for his constituency, and for a rep, that is what matters the most. Attitudes and politics for a constituency can change over time, but Murtha has shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that he stands for the people he represents.

And you'll find many people here, including myself, who are pro-military. I come from a military family. We need a strong military for defense. The problem I have with politics and the military is that it too is overplayed. Politicians (mostly republicans) use the military as a wedge issue or a hammer to beat their opponents with. It's to the point where you can't vote to decrease spending in the military or you'll lose your next election. The truth is, we are spending far more on military than we need to and we are abusing the military with the BushCo agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Murtha is the one on the right sitting in the loveseat
right?

Wow I don't know why but I expected an old white haired guy :rof:

God those suits look uncomfortable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. Finally someone who has watched the video and analyzed it!
I'm so damn sick and tired of people jumping to conclusions based on media hype without having viewed the video. I in simply in one of those moods where I don't have the damn energy to point out the obvious to people.

McCoy, you're the real deal and you've done a great service here. Kicked and recommended. :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kicking for Truth
Watch the video people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. it is amazing the amount of Swiftboating that is going on
And its going on HERE.

What the fuck happened to the DU that debated issues and didnt have to resort to red herrings, old non-issues and taking stuff out of context???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I dunno, freeper influx, pent up frustrations at Bush, who knows
but it's there. I wonder how long before DU settles back down. Things have been pretty tense since Israel invaded Lebanon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's just what I wanted to read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. Murtha Up on Hardball
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Cool. He just laid to rest any question over his *maybe later* statement in the video
that has got some hand wringers all upset here. That 2-second clip of the 53 minute video is where he is basically trying to get these guys off his back. They pushed and pushed the $50k on him over and over again 20 minutes straight before that where he repeatedly said, no that's not right, we don't do that here. He wanted them basically to stop and he had to finesse his way out of it. Remember, he thought these guys were Sheiks and he didn't want to offend them and if he could educate them on how to do it ethically and legally, it would be a big win for his district.

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WRONG or HARM IN THAT. Murtha did what he was supposed to do: stand up for his district while upholding the law and a high level of ethics. Can we have DUers stop buying into the RW talking points now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zreosumgame Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
32. but but but the AMERICAN SPECTATOR
has alreaad found him guilty! How can you possibly say no to that RW rag?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. kick nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. Thank you.
:kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
35. Thanks and bookmarked nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. Very interesting vid. He did not sound corrupt - but
He swore like a sailor!

Perhaps the RW should focus on his cursing - they might gain some traction w/ Fundies w/ that accusation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
37. DAMN, I hate to keep kicking this myself, But I have a great reason
I'm still seeing TOO MANY GOOD DUers buying the RW Talking points on this. I just can't believe so many of us are falling for the BULLSHIT story being put out there by obviously RW HACKS.

PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO and read my analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. A couple of points......
just because people have questions doesn't mean they are buying RW talking points. I didn't hear any talking points, I heard part of the video. My question is can't we find someone who doesn't have something hanging out there to be used as ammunition against them?

Secondly, NOT EVERYBODY CAN WATCH THE FRIGGIN' VIDEO. I have dialup....I would never get a 52 minute video downloaded.

Maybe if someone had a transcript it would help.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Can't help you on the bandwidth issue
But I can address your first question. Murtha does not have "something hanging out there to be used against him". THEY ARE MAKING IT UP. The FBI tried to catch him in a sting and he gave them an education on ethics. The RW is expert at taking a 5-10 second snippet of something someone says and turning into a bullshit story. And yes, THEY CAN AND WILL DO THIS TO ANYONE who poses a risk to their agenda.

There is not a SINGLE PERSON who has stood up against the CRIMINALITY OF THIS ADMINISTRATION who has not been completely attacked this way. Go ahead, name one person who has come out publicly to attack the Administration who has not been brutally hit with this crap. They did it to the Dixie Chicks for crying out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. I watched most of the video and then happened by H&C last night
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 08:59 AM by underpants
I just knew that Hannity would be all over this.

ON EDIT- I watched the first 25 minutes and then skipped ahead to the last 5 minutes.

And I also knew what part he would focus on, the "not now but maybe in the future" part. Hannity knows exactly what Murtha meant ;-) even though we KNOW what actually happened which is that Murtha never took any money. As much as the ethics committe was willing to indict they didn't indict Murtha.

The part at the end where the lead guy (Melvin Weinberg?) says that it Murtha isn't going to take the money is the most telling part but you and I know that that will never see the light of day on Fox or anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. I hope Murtha Sues Fox News for this
Someone has to stand up to Fox and tell them they can't take a statement out of context and destroy someone's reputation with it. There are plenty of people here ready to throw Murtha under the bus for this bullshit! What Fox did is called SLANDER and they can be sued for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eringer Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Hannity Sucks
Caught part of his puke on the radio yesterday. Apparently, his keepers in the WH want him to take the lead on the character assassination of Nancy Pelosi for backing Murtha as majority leader. Diana Irey (the one that Murtha beat last week to retain his seat) was "on the air" with Hannity to do some Murtha/Pelosi bashing as well. She sounds like an Ann Coulter clone. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
40. Just wonderin' how many times Mitch McConnell faced similar situations
Also wonderin' how many times Mitch turned down the money.

After all, McConnell has raised over $220 MILLION for himself and his GOP mouth-breathers.

Murtha is OK in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPS Worst Fear Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
44. We Can Bring Up The Keating 5 Scandal and McCain
I know the others were Democrats but that doesn't exhonerate McCains involvment.Let's bring that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
46. kicking for later.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
47. i'd like to see video of those who took the money
the comparison may put to rest all the innuendo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC