Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH-LAST DITCH EFFORT TO SAVE FACE & PREP FOR 08- MORE $$$ & TROOPS TO IRAQ (Guardian)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:41 PM
Original message
BUSH-LAST DITCH EFFORT TO SAVE FACE & PREP FOR 08- MORE $$$ & TROOPS TO IRAQ (Guardian)
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 10:39 PM by kpete
US plans last big push in Iraq


Strategy document calls for extra 20,000 troops, aid for Iraqi army and regional summit

Simon Tisdall
Thursday November 16, 2006
The Guardian


President George Bush has told senior advisers that the US and its allies must make "a last big push" to win the war in Iraq and that instead of beginning a troop withdrawal next year, he may increase US forces by up to 20,000 soldiers, according to sources familiar with the administration's internal deliberations.

...................

"You've got to remember, whatever the Democrats say, it's Bush still calling the shots. He believes it's a matter of political will. That's what Kissinger told him. And he's going to stick with it," a former senior administration official said. "He is in a state of denial about Iraq. Nobody else is any more. But he is. But he knows he's got less than a year, maybe six months, to make it work. If it fails, I expect the withdrawal process to begin next fall."

The "last push" strategy is also intended to give Mr Bush and the Republicans "political time and space" to recover from their election drubbing and prepare for the 2008 presidential campaign, the official said. "The Iraq Study Group buys time for the president to have one last go. If the Democrats are smart, they'll play along, and I think they will. But forget about bipartisanship. It's all about who's going to be in best shape to win the White House.

The official added: "Bush has said 'no' to withdrawal, so what else do you have? The Baker report will be a set of ideas, more realistic than in the past, that can be used as political tools. What they're going to say is: lower the goals, forget about the democracy crap, put more resources in, do it."


more at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1948748,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here it comes...
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The Decider
and the Denier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. To expect the Great Polarizer to do anything otherwise
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 10:03 PM by kenny blankenship
was highly unrealistic. All Rove knows is polarization. (And of course Bush only knows what Rove and Cheney tell him).
Bush wants to trap hill Democrats into support for his war and into the pattern of accepting his leadership. He will hit them early and often for war appropriations. Congress cannot directly influence troop levels or strategy. They have only 2 levers to halt a President bent on escalating a war or bent on permanent war: catastrophically defunding the conflict or impeaching the President. One of those levers will have to be pulled before this is all over.

Or they can meekly follow Bush's lead for the next 2 years.

Another way to put this is that moderates are going to have to decide whether they are really AGAINST the war, or really FOR it. Bush ain't going to let you steer down the middle. Since the Chimperor is adamantly opposed to a change of goals in Iraq, (quel surprise) and since he commands the military, you can take your pick from
A) Get Out Now, or B) Shut up & Support Our Troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerstin Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Investigate 9/11. Now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. And of course the Bush girls
will be the first to volunteer/sign up for active, frontline duty in this latest "big push".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, those against leaving Iraq should love this...
I don't understand how any dem thinks that we somehow "owe" Iraq our blood and money. Anyone thinking we are "stabilizing" that country is delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well, we probably do owe them our money.
Millenniums of reparations, I would assume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. So if we don't give him all our money and all our soldiers....
well, dammit, then it's our fault if we lose this war.

And Fox News will tell us so.

Nobody has the guts to take away Murdoch's broadcast license, I assume?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. General Abizaid was quite clear on my tee-vee today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. All that matters
to the little bastard we call President is getting through the next two years without having to order the withdrawl himself.

That is all he cares about at this point, not having to admit his miserable failure in public.

If there is a hell, that fucking weasel is going to burn & burn & burn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. They probably plan to build towards their fight for Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. 4 points to victory - so much for those thiming Poppy will get us out
Adopting some of Clark's idea (talk with the countries in the region) - only as window dressing for escalation. The main thing they want : more money!

4 NEW WAYS OF ASKING FOR MONEY


I so hope dems don't allow themselves bullied on it!
As for war as path to 2008, even since Michael reagan said Dems do it, i knew it was projection!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1948748,00.html
Four-point strategy

· Increase US troop levels by up to 20,000 to secure Baghdad and allow redeployments elsewhere in Iraq

· Focus on regional cooperation with international conference and/or direct diplomatic involvement of countries such as Kuwait and Saudi Arabia

· Revive reconciliation process between Sunni, Shia and others

· Increased resources from Congress to fund training and equipment of Iraqi security forces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. If the Democrats go along with this, it proves they should not be re-elected.
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 10:28 AM by oc2002
The last push is a hoax, nothing more, a ploy to make it look like there is a way to force change in Iraq. A tactic that has no merrit.

If the democrats accept this without bringing the 'senior advisors' before congress to testify under oath, and make them explain thier 'theory' or why they think it would work when it has failed time after time, then Congress has failed its obligations.

Insanity is repeating the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Like hell * still calls all the shots in Iraq...
The Dem Congress now controls the pocketbook that finances the whole fiasco. No money, no war....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh, now it makes sense. McLame was calling for 20K more
troops for Iraq. He and Busholini are on the same page of delusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Dems: Just say no. That is why you were elected. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC