Du This Poll - Investigation of Don Rumsfield.

[dapper]

http://www.southbendtribune.com

Do you believe the investigation into outgoing Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's role in abuse at Abu Grahib and Guantanamo Bay is justified?

Dapper

[Donnachaidh]

1. done -- but we still need more!

at 45% yes

54% no

[texpatriot2004]

2. it's been freeped nm

[Greybnk48]

3. done. The majority think he should NOT be investigated.

Hard to believe.

[JoMama49]

5. Done, but the "no's" still have it n/t

[madokie]

4. yes 46.3 out of 676 votes

[helderheid]

6. done and RECOMMENDED - needs help

[Lowell]

7. Done & Kick!

[negativenihil]

8. done! n/t

[Poiuyt]

9. done Yes - 54.7%

[Ian David]

10. Done! 55.2% "Yes" with 831 votes.

Do you believe the investigation into outgoing Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's role in abuse at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay is justified?


Number of votes cast: 831
http://www.southbendtribune.com/

[Window]

11. Done, still needs help.

Do you believe the investigation into outgoing Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's role in abuse at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay is justified?


Yes 54.5%

No 45.5%

Number of votes cast: 817

[dapper]

12. Wow!

and one more K&R and we are on the Favorites list.

350 votes since I posted this!

61.1 Yes and 38.9 No

I'm not even going to get into the Opinion piece from Monday, I already sent a LTE- I'm sure it will not be published.

Dapeper

[LilyLibber]

13. DUne!

Yes - 61.8 :hi:

[FraDon]

14. 61.9%

of 1131 votes.

[Jack Rabbit]

15. Absolutely

Furthermore, if the facts warrant (and I believe that is the case), then if the US is not willing or able to prosecute the American Torquemadas than a an international tribunal should be established for that purpose.

[BrightKnight]

16. done

[LonelyLRLiberal]

17. Yes - 62.3%

1152 votes cast

[Metta]

18. Done. We fill the bucket even if drop by drop.

:thumbsup: :donut: :donut:

[robertpaulsen]

19. Done. 62.7% 1198 votes. Keep it up!

:kick:

:dem:

[Amonester]

20. Done: 62.9% 'Yes' 1206 votes.

:kick: & R

[orleans]

21. done n/t

[Jokinomx]

22. Done...

K & R...

:kick:

[Terri S]

23. Done

Yes 62.9% 1303 votes

[Disturbed]

24. He Should be Indicted

Rumsfeld Shouldn't be Fired, He Should be Indicted
by Matthew Rothschild

“Secretary Rumsfeld has publicly admitted that . . . he ordered an Iraqi national held in Camp Cropper, a high security detention center in Iraq, to be kept off the prison’s rolls and not presented to the International Committee of the Red Cross,” the report noted. The Geneva Conventions require countries to grant the Red Cross access to all detainees. “

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0418-24.htm

Further Evidence Rumsfeld Implicated in War Crimes
Please read this important post by Marty Lederman, Army Confirms: Rumsfeld Authorized Criminal Conduct.

Here's a key section, but there's more:
The Army's charges against Jordan reflect the view, undoubtedly correct, that the use of forced nudity or intimidation with dogs against detainees subject to military control constitutes cruelty and maltreatment that Article 93 makes criminal. It doesn't matter whether they are or are not "torture," as such; nor does it matter whether the armed forces should be permitted to use such interrogation techniques: As things currently stand, they are unlawful, as even the Army now acknowledges.

But then how can we account for the actions of the Secretary of Defense and his close aides?

On November 27, 2002, Pentagon General Counsel William Haynes, following discussions with Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz, General Myers, and Doug Feith, informed the Secretary of Defense that forced nudity and the use of the fear of dogs to induce stress were lawful techniques, and he recommended that they be approved for use at Guantanamo.
(The lists of techniques to which Haynes was referring can be found in this memorandum.) On December 2, 2002, Secretary Rumsfeld approved those techniques for use at Guantanamo -- and subsequently those techniques were used on detainee Mohammed al-Qahtani.

In other words, the Secretary of Defense authorized criminal conduct.

...

Today's Army charge under UCMJ Article 93 against Lt. Col. Jordan -- for conduct that the SecDef actually authorized as to some detainees -- demonstrates that Rumsfeld approved of, and encouraged, violations of the criminal law.

http://www.discourse.net/archives/2006/04/further_evidence_rumsfeld_implicated_in_war_crimes.html

[RedCloud]

25. Done and keep voting.

Democracy in action once again!

[Califooyah Operative]

26. done. nt

[Swamp Rat]

27. Done! Done! DONE!!! - YES - 62.9% of 1410 votes.

[donheld]

28. done

:bounce:

[Alapop]

29. Done.