Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Got caught running red light on a camera

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:24 AM
Original message
Got caught running red light on a camera
It appeared I was guilty so I just paid the fine. You can even see a video of your car going through the intersection on a website.

It just had a big-brother feel to it.

I get that I was guilty and should pay the fine, and am not interested in contesting it in any way, or even arguing against it, just that my point is that it just had this big-brother feel to it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anytime the Government looks at you
it has a big brother feel to it - on the other hand, in a large industrial nation it's inevitable that they will look at us from time to time.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:28 AM
Original message
Bad treestar
I have an eight inch scar on my shoulder and a permanently messed up back from two seperate times someone else decided to run a red light or stop sign. Got to break a window with my head too. Please be careful out there. A lot of people aren't as lucky as I am every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. I knew that in spite of my disclaimer, someone would miss the point.
Do you assign yourself to a group of people who never do any traffic violations, but are always the victim?

I wasn't even aware of it (so it was inattention). So you could have done it a zillion times and never happened to have been caught.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yeah actually
I faithfully obey the traffic laws at all possible times. I didn't miss your point but I also wasn't going to miss the chance to remind you that inattention can hurt and it can kill. Don't confess if you don't want to be judged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. You could have done it and not be aware of it is my point
I faithfully obey the traffic laws at all times too.

Some people can't pass on a chance to be judgmental, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. I have always obeyed all traffic laws except I sometimes speed just to
keep up with others, but one night several years ago I was driving home and stopped at a red light and then drove straight through it. I realized almost immediately what I had done and all I can think of was that at the time I was thinking of it as a stop sign, I was tired and had a lot on my mind and it was not intentional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
59. If you broke the law without being aware of it...
That itself is a problem. It means that you were preoccupied with something and weren't paying attention to the road conditions around you. Being innattentive is not an acceptable excuse for placing other peoples lives at risk (by running a red light without noticing, you basically just admitted that you weren't paying attention).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. I didn't actually run the red light I stopped looked and for some reason
treated it as a stop sign. I at no time put anyones life at risk there was absolutely no one around, after I did this I really had no idea why I did it it is not something I have ever done before confusing a red light with a stop sign. I have been driving for 30 years and have never had a single ticket or been involved in any accident except for when a deer hit my car. I was obviously preoccupied and it bothered me that I did this because I really couldn't explain it to myself but as i said I stopped first and then treated it as a stop sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. What you really need to ask yourself...
If you were so preoccupied that you didn't even notice the light, what else didn't you notice? Would you have registered a pedestrian stepping off the curb? Or a kid crossing on a bike? You might say yes, but by your own admission you can't explain how you failed to register the light. If you didn't notice one major road hazard, how many others might you have missed?

That's why inattentiveness isn't an excuse. In my life, I've known four people who have lost their lives in auto accidents. One was drunk. The other three died to to inattentiveness (either their own, or that of another driver).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
68. The first traffic law . .
. . is to always be attentive when controlling several thousand pounds of steel hurtling down the street at high speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. They had a piece about this on the local news last night
They're ticketing drivers for speeding around here with the same equipment. They take a pic on the approach to get the driver then another to get the rear license plate. It's a $375 fine and it doubles with a second offense. It's supposed to bring in $1.3 million (IIRC the figure). AND they're expanding it.

They have cameras all over the place. I don't like it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. For speeding it could be problematic
How does the photo show speeding? I guess as a film it might, but how? You still need evidence on feet per second and how far the car was shown to go in the film.

For a red light it is much clearer but in some cases, it might not be.

But they had the license plate and the car and it going through the intersection and the light all in magnificent color. Just had a weird feeling.

It was on election day, too! I must have been distracted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. It only takes two photos.
If the distance between your car in the first and second pictures is greater than the most you could have traveled under the speed limit, you were speeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Radar trailers
There is a sign that shows you your speed. The ones I've seen, the numbers flash if you're speeding. Apparently, the driver can see the flash when the pic is taken and some drivers are trying to find ways to get around it (like spraying license plate so it's overexposed and can't be read).

They're taking four pics of both the approach and departing passes, with and without flashes. That way, they seek to get at least one clear shot of each. The pic is mailed out with the ticket and it is a mandatory court appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernBelle82 Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
60. Yep
On our new license plates they have some type of bar code on it too. So if you run a red light they can see that too. I haven't seen cameras though so I don't know. The only time's I've run a red light is when it's impossible for me to stop in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. They Are Trying To Pass A Law Like That In Florida...
It's meeting a lot of resistance...

I can see both sides...

Red light runners are probably the most dangerous of the driving scofflaws...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. It's not always done on purpose, you know.
I don't really object to it but wanted to discuss the big-brotherish feel to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
39. On purpose or not, still very dangerous
Think you may be missing the point of some replies. They aren't beating you up, just stating some facts and opinions re inattentive red light runners. Meaning no malice while not paying attention is no comfort for those who may be injured or killed, or for their loved ones for that matter.

While I don't like the big brother thing in MOST instances, the PUBLIC ROADS are not a place one has any rights to privacy. So long as the cameras get a picture of who is actually driving the vehicle rather than just the license plate, I really think people should just realize they are on PUBLIC property, engaged in activities which DO INVOLVE the safety of the PUBLIC and not in their own homes where their behavior affects no one but themselves.

Your car is not your castle and the public roads are not behind your own closed doors. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Britain has cameras that yell at you
In parks and stuff - throw that trash away, stop running into people, you're gonna' poke your eye out!! Okay, not that last one, but still. I don't know why people want to live under a microscope, creeps me out.

Why'd you run a red light? :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. That would be miserable.
Talk about a nanny state.

It was inattention. Why do so many assume it is on purpose?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Inattention can actually be worse.
In some cases......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Anybody can do it by inattention.
And be unaware of it.

Don't see how doing it on purpose could be "better."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Oh there's a difference
I've never run a red light or stop sign in my life and I'm 49 years old. If you did it on purpose, like because it was 2 am and there was no traffic, that would be much better than inattention.

Still, shit happens, I understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Actually you have no way of knowing that for certain
You could have done it and been unaware of it, and no one noticed. I would say I have never run one, either. But now am more aware that it could happen if you aren't paying close enough attention. Makes you much more aware of how driving takes a certain amount of attention that we don't always give it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. Some of us take very great care
to make sure we are always aware of what we're doing when we're driving, thank you very much. In fact when I drive cab I avoid getting in several accidents a day only because I'm paying more attention seemingly than most of the drivers on the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. I know I've never had a ticket
And only been in one accident where the driver ran into me. So make of it what you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
38. It's not better, it's still stupid and breaking the law
But I also don't know of many people who make the decision to intentionally run a red light when there is a good chance someone could hit them and not look both ways before they do it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #38
44. for gosh sakes NEVER break the law, right up there with the ten commandments
hm... lol lol. i really idd not know what a bad person i was... (well ya i did, the fundies have been clear over the years) until just this last week of posts. i did not know the laws were the all wise, as some seem to interpret. i hae actually had the audacity to cross streets outside of crosswalks, confident in my ability to look both ways, AND not get hit by a car or put ANYONE in danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. Nah, you still shouldn't do it
Because with the way stupidity is going around today, I don't trust the majority of people to be able to judge whether or not anyone is coming through......the smart folks should set the example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #49
55. you dont TRUST... i should NOT do it. cross a friggin street all by myself
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 11:15 AM by seabeyond
the smart people should set the example

this is what is sooooo damn scary


i cannot willnot live this way. not trust fellow man in such a way. just as i cannot willnot do it to fellow man on moral or christian value like the cult of christianity spreading hate across the nation.

i cannot will myself to be so blindly ignorant. i am not capable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Oookay........
Leave your life in the hands of a non-voter who thinks Bush "is getting a bad rap and seems like a nice guy and OH MAH GAWD TURN IT UP IT'S JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE'S NEW SONG!!!!!!"

crash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
53. No better than drunk driving.
Am I supposed to shrug off the danger you created by being "inattentive" just because you (I assume) didn't have alcohol in your system?

Why do some people who create hazards get a slap on the wrist while others pay the price for all the ills of society?

Why do people get to say that someone who drives after one drink should go to prison for life, while your much more dangerous behavior would prompt no such response?

I'm not saying you should be punished severely, but it's puzzling how the state-sponsored moralists pick and choose their targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. I asked
I didn't assume anything. I only post the spank smilie in jest, to tease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. what happens to the child whose parent watches, catches, punishes
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 10:36 AM by seabeyond
him every step of the way?

i know it is not and wont in later years be the way i raise my children. there will be things i see that i will purposely ignore and allow him to get away with because it would be unhealthy to him otherwise. we are setting this society up for a greater mess than we have ever seen.... all justifying one way or another, the greater good, or christian value. but imperfection is no longer allowed


to be enlightened is to be without anxiety over imperfection
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
66. Apples and oranges
I for one appreciate that fact you are old enough to look both ways and make sure you are safe outside a crosswalk. That has absolutely nothing to with putting someone in a 3 ton machine at 60mph that has the potential of killing someone should the driver become inattentive.

It's my bet this little bit of big brother will alter treestar's behavior for at least a little while and he/she won't be driving inattentive any time soon. -- at least I would hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #66
81. so the next time the lite is green.... going 20 to 30 and 5 feet from line
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 10:35 PM by seabeyond
lite turns yellow..... treestar will be damn sure to slam on those breaks as hard and fast as he can to be sure he isnt in the middle of the intersectin when it turns red and possibly take his picture. you know what htis is NOW

a "potential" for danger that is no longer the good for society as a whole as the car behind him hits him expecting him to go thru cause it is yellow after all and he shouldnt stop, he should go thru.

just saying, the potential is there for a greater potential of accidents.

what may seem good may not bring the deisred effects, or they may. action reaction. pavalovs dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. I was caught once. They sent me a photo of my car.
I knew I was guilty so I paid a fine of $70. And the worse part of it is that you can't pay by check. It has to be by money order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. I know. I just paid it. It was $75. But it just felt weird, having this film
of my car in possession of an all-seeing big brother. (At least, as to that intersection).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
62. Wow, only $75? Red light violations are $390 here.
$350 goes to the state of California, $40 goes to the city. By the time you get done paying your "court appearance fees" and "fee processing fees", you're usually well over $400.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #62
70. A friend of mine paid a $500 fine for a cigarette butt
her PASSENGER dropped a cigarette butt out the window (on asphalt..and it was OUT)....

My friend heard the "whoop whoop", pulled over and whammo.. a huge fine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. $500 in SoCal? She got off easy!
With the number of fires you all get at that end of the state, I'm suprised she wasn't charged with conspiracy to commit arson or something! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. Yeh. I know.. but it was IN TOWN and on asphalt
She just happened to go down the wrong street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. I love these things and would not mind more of them
Let the cops worry with shootings and kidnappers. Let the cameras remind aggressive drivers that endanger people's lives to act right. We put enough of these out there maybe the "children" will quit their antics. And if they don't and get caught pulling this stuff multiple times then they should do hard time. When an aggressive driver maims or kills someone they are no different than the other thugs we lock up.

Sorry, nothing personal treestar. I've just seen too many people end up hurt beyond belief because some jackass thought getting to their destination 45 seconds quicker was worth endangering the lives and and livelihoods of everyone else around them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. That wasn't the way I was thinking, but whatever
My point was the big-brother feel to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. I understood your point, probably did not make my own clear.
Used carefully bigbrotherhood can be very useful. IMHO. Your example of the red light cameras is IMHO a PERFECT example. Every year aggressive drivers kill/maim more people than drunks do. These people are HIGHLY dangerous. The proof is out now that these cameras and the expensive tickets that go with them are drastically altering people's behavior at these dangerous intersection. One intersection near my home had 418 accidents in 2002 with 40 deaths, 112 addition needed lifeflight to a trauma center. The camera's were installed in 2003 and by 2004 there were only 88 accidents at that intersection with 3 deaths -- by 2005 it was only 35 accidents. This is just one intersection....

The camera's don't take anyone's rights away and have clearly saved MANY lives/disabling injuries. Certainly there needs to be appropriate checks and balances on the use of technology but I don't see the need to fear this kind of bigbrotherhood. I see it as extremely helpful, freeing up police who would otherwise be stationed somewhere near the intersection to help control the idiocy --- and yes I know I'm probably a little overly harsh on these drivers - I have seen too much to be kind -- as the saying goes, sometimes it's more loving to slap a hand than hold it.

Well, anyways, I did get your point. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. pulling this stuff multiple times then they should do hard time
wowo.... what a world you see. i am getting more and more scared listening to the rhetoric of some on this board. i tell ya, just shoot them and then you will never have to deal with their sorry asses again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. What you don't understand is
aggressive drivers kill/injure more people every year than drunk drivers. IMHO it's time we recognize that habitual aggressive drivers are criminals who blatantly put the lives of other people at risk. There are people who have lost their licenses because of immature driving and yet continue to drive without a license. IMHO at that point the only way to get their attention is jail time.

I'm not advocating shooting anyone. IMHO that was an assinine comeback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. I don't want to pick on you, but did you learn anything?
I've seen more red light runners here in Ga. than any of the 4 states I've lived in! We were nearly killed by one who was driving a BIG PU truck (3/4 ton dully)who never even slowed down at the intersection! The light changed, and my husband had already started moving when I saw, out of the corner of my eye, something moving very fast. Iyelled wait! He slammed on the brakes and I doubt the driver of the truck even knew what he had done.

I don't like being watched all the time either, but I don't know how to stop people from doing this sort of thing. If it saves a lot of accidents by teaching people (though their wallet) this isn't something you should be doing, then I guess it's not such a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Yeah, that there are a lot of people who believe they never violate the
traffic laws inadvertently. Maybe you are more dangerous since you think you are incapable of inadvertently going through a red light?

I don't remember doing it so I certainly did not do it on purpose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #25
50. Not me! I can't drive anymore. When I did drive, yes, I broke the speed limit laws.
I wasn't completely nuts, breaking them with insane speeds, but 10 MPH over the limit is still breaking the laws. The one thing I was always very careful about was traffic lights. I suppose it was out of fear, because bad things happen when two moving objects collide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. While I'm not a big defender of traffic fines, the main reason all this stuff....
...has come about is:
1. More Money (of course)
2. It seems a LOT of folks run red lights nowadays. I almost have been hit several times.

Having said all that, Fines are Bullshit. There should be other "Punishments"
..maybe community service or whatever.

The idea that a poor person has to pay a large share of his/her weekly salary, compared to a wealthy person who just laughs it off is grossly unfair.

And to those who say "Life isn't Fair" ...I say..It's up to us to try to make it more fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. True, they should be scaled to income but that would take so much
more bureaucracy and involve the state looking into your income.

The big brotherish nature of it would be worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. You might have ran the red, or in reality, gone through a yellow -
Check to see what the timing of the lights are and if they've changed since the camera was put in.

There was a huge scandal a few years back in San Diego concerning the red-light cameras; the company providing the service was apparently getting a "cut" depending on the amount of tickets they could get written and had knocked two-three seconds off the yellow cycle to catch more "red light runners". In one major intersection, county traffic engineers had decided that a 10-second yellow was required for safety as well as "a clear intersection" due to 1) being near a freeway on/off ramp 2) a limited vision curve coming into the intersection and 3) a major mall - all on the intersection of two 45mph stretch of streets with few traffic or street lighting; the red-light company reset the yellow to 6 seconds leaving a lot of drivers stuck in the middle of the intersection when the light turned to red.

This actually ended up causing more accidents, as drivers would speed up to make the light or not see cars stuck in the intersection as they came up the curve to cross the intersection.

I'm not saying you could get out of the ticket - but if the light cycle has been changed, you do need to see what you can do to raise a stink due to the safety issue.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Interesting thought - another thing was that it was outsourced to an
out of state company - somehow seemed wrong that the people who benefit from it are from another state.

Can't wait to see these things coming from India - then suddenly there will be a protest to the big-brother nature of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. We've been attempting to take chance out of life for thousands of years
Big Brother will come, most likely, for perfectly sane reasons. It won't come all at once, but over multiple generations. That's why we're going to have a problem.

Like was said in another post, look at the UK. The most watched society in the western world, if not the planet.

Like was said in another post, with more and more people, more order and control will be required for society to function.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. Yeah, that's true. There's still a lot of open space, but earth is
limited.

Though eventually there could be a point where big brother just has too much data to be able to function, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #31
48. That's why we have computers
You're right though, big brother can't escape entropy either. But that's why technological power will increase the amount of information able to be stored all the time. However, you're right again, at some point it won't be able to function, no matter how advanced it is. Entropy always wins.

Not that much open space either. These days, someone/something owns it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
30. We seem to always be on camera anymore. Except at home.
And some people have cameras in their homes.

It is very "big brother" and it bothers me a lot. We simply don't have any privacy any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
43. Yeah, it's as if the least common denominator is assigned to us all
It is assumed we will commit a crime if we can get away with it and that evidence will be needed.

Knowing where everyone is at all times is a temptation for whoever has to solve crimes. Yet it is worth it? Interesting question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #30
51. That is my issue. We're always on camera.
I understand the reasons we have cameras everywhere, and I have no solid arguments against them. The pro-camera argument can beat me every time. But I still just don't like that my every move is recorded somewhere.

I house sat for a wealthy couple while in college. When I was walking through the home, I kept hearing these clicking sounds from the vents. Upon looking, I discovered camera that actually trace all movement within the house. It was really creepy. I wasn't doing anything wrong, but those cameras made me nervous. I can imagine the tape of me squinting, looking in the vent and my horrified reaction. The man's father is a famous NYC art dealer and they have lots of expensive pieces in their home. They also have many other pop culture artifacts in their home. So, I get the cameras, but still... creepy to feel multiple cameras on you at all times- even while sleeping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
32. Funny story.
My husband is the registered owner of my son's car. Son ran a red in Savannah (we live in Nashvegas) and they mailed a ticket to my husband here.

THAT was a funny phone call! He sent my husband twice the cost of the ticket. I asked him why he said, "I doubled it for stupidity!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. There was a part of the form that was for assigning the blame to another
driver.

So far at least they can only get the car, so they are dependent on giving the ticket to the "car." In some households it could even create a fight. Imagine a few teens trying to blame it on the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
33. Thank your lucky stars you didn't cause an accident.
Pay the ticket and stop running red lights. You can always demand to hand your check to a live person if it makes you feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. I said all that. My point was the big brother feel to it. I mailed it in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
36. Red light cameras cause an increase in rear-end collisions
On the other hand, they decrease the number of broadside collisions.

Statistics are somewhere on the internets, and can be found with the google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. True, sometimes it's actually safer to keep going through a yellow
than to come to a sudden stop. In Calif. they had the good idea of having a second or two of All Red.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
69. Only if you're speeding.
The average yellow light is 6-8 seconds in length.

Researchers have demonstrated that it takes about 3/4ths of a second for our brain to comprehend a yellow light and begin to respond, and about another 3/4ths of a second to move our foot from the gas and begin braking. According to Edmunds, at 60MPH (quite fast for a surface street with lights), the average American car can be brought to a halt in 138 feet, or 3.1 seconds. That provides us with a total braking time of 4.6 seconds at 60MPH.

So no, I don't buy the argument that a 6 second yellow is too short to stop a vehicle in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. yes.. but that would be reason over blind following of law
i actually pick up speed a tad when passing someone to get it done faster to create distance, (safeness) and out of curtesy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
45. Note to all philanderers
Do not run red lights or speed if you are not where you're supposed to be. A red light camera or photo radar can ruin your whole day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #45
54. Actually, some guy sued on that very basis
might have actually made his day when he won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
52. With so many people not obeying traffic rules now a days it is getting more dangerous to drive.
The only way I see it slowing down is that people feel they will get caught if the disobey the rules. I don't think there are enough cops to cover all the areas needed so I can live with the cameras. As the number of ass-hole drivers goes up so to does the number of big brother tactics increase in proportion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. We have them all over for both speeding and running red lights.
I think they are great. They help save lives and since we don't have enough funding for the police department as it is, gives them the opportunity to focus on other things while also taking care of traffic violations.

As for Big Brother...well, don't break the law and they won't be videotaping you. I don't feel it's Big Brother-ish at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
64. Well, I'm glad you own up to it.
There was some goofball who did the same thing a couple of months ago and there was a big flamewar because he kept trying to weasel out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
65. I was in Switzerland 20 years ago, and they had them there then. And,
yes, it feels like Big Brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
67. My wife has been caught twice both those here in MD.
$75 each time. Didn't have those in CT.

Not much you can do about them, because the picture tells all. It's hard to contest it, when they have a picture of you doing it.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
71. Your honesty is commendable
Next time don't risk that stale yellow light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
72. To all you faithful traffic law obeyers
Please stay in the right lane so I can get around you when I exceed the speed limit. That's all.

Thanks,

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. No way
It is SOOOO entertaining to sit in the left lane on I-5 and put along at 65MPH. People are incredibly friendly, and they all apparently think I'm number one! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. So it's YOU who likes to "lead the parade!"
I knew it!

:rofl:

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #72
82. lol lol lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
74. And the camera company ususally gets a cut, too
It is very Big Brother. Do some looking into old issues of Car and Driver; they have had some very good reporting on how accident rates rise and stay higher in the majority of places where these cameras are installed, and where all the money goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
76. Freepers love these cameras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
79. They were doing this in Germany in the early nineties...
...minus the Web. People just got tickets in the mail, along with photos detailed enough to ID drivers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
83. Oh give me a fucking break. You broke the law. Why should we care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
84. Someone could make a LOT of money
by creating a clear paint that goes over your license plate that scrambles the letters when videotaped.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #84
85. wouldnt that be fun
bah hahahah. lol lol hwnn... i didnt bad w i was such a girl until being around all these goodie to shoes, llol lol. really i did not. actualy i said the same thing being around all the fundie goodie to shoes i had never experienced in life. maybe i am just too honest about my bad. anyway, i like that idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
86. can we see too?
care to give out a url...or is too much personal info required...?

i was sitting at an intersection in chicago one night a couple weeks back(peterson & western) and someone got their picture taken for the very same thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC