Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYTimes --- "...tattered baggage of John Murtha..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:05 AM
Original message
NYTimes --- "...tattered baggage of John Murtha..."
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/16/opinion/16thur2.html

<snip>
As victorious Democrats choose the Capitol hierarchy to promote their promises of reform, and Republicans choose their new minority leadership, they are entitled to their own best judgments. With that in mind, we have no prime candidates to tout for caucus leadership. We just want to remind lawmakers of the one clear message from this muddled election season: voters wanted something other than the old back-scratching status quo.

So far, the Democrats seem not to have paid much attention to the tattered baggage lugged into the limelight by Representative John Murtha of Pennsylvania, the Iraq war critic who is Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi’s choice for second in command. And yesterday, Republicans resurrected Trent Lott, the Mississippi senator who fell from the majority leader’s post three years ago.

For all his commendable instincts in articulating the Bush administration’s Iraq failures, Mr. Murtha has long been known in the Capitol as a crude master of swapping pork-barrel budget goodies for lobbyists’ campaign lucre. Only recently, he stood out for opposing strong ethics reform.

And while Ms. Pelosi is vowing to hammer home ethics reform as her first order of business, the Capitol newspaper Roll Call reported that Mr. Murtha was vulgarly belittling her program in private meetings with lawmakers. Mr. Murtha’s ambition is directed against the current No. 2, Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland, who also is no slouch in maintaining overly close ties to the K Street business and lobbying powers.

...more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. When the media and the right rag on Murtha, it makes
me want him all the more.... Murtha wants an end to this war and that will be his main objective... ON this I stand with him and that is why he needs to be majority leader.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipDC Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No on Murtha
He doesn't represent the Democratic party and progressives on most other issues. And he didn't raise money for Democratic candidates like Hoyer did. Can't justify electing him Majority Leader just based on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. YES to MURTHA-- he wants to end the war
and that is the only thing I am interested in at this point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. well Hoyer ran the Democratic K Street
I can vote against Hoyer for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. How Does The NYT Get Thrown In With The Rest Of The Media?
It's the most reliably progressive major newspaper in the nation...

If you want I'll supply several examples...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Same NY Times that lead us into the Iraq War?
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 11:39 AM by dogday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. That Was One Compromised Reporter-Judith Miller
Fact

The New York Times is the only major paper in the USA to have the balls to run gay wedding announcements ...

Fact...

The New York Times didn't endorse one Republican this year...


Fact...

The New York Times was the first major paper to respond to the Swift Boat lies and unveil the web behind them...


Fact...

In the 2000 election it was the New York Times that uncover the infamous Republican DemocRAT ad....


I could go on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. That's all it took was one reporter
and the NY Times is responsible for what they print... I guess having a Son in Iraq has made me bitter against this war and that is my main concern...

I know the Times also prints progressive articles, but it has also held back articles for this administration....Remember the story the Times sat on for a year, could of released it before the elections and did not... Wasn't that the wire-tapping story?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/16/AR2005121601716.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I Have Been Reading The Times For God Knows How Long...
I never got the feeling they were cheerleaders for the war... They ran articles on realists such as Henry Kissinger and Brett Scowcroft who opposed the war from it's inception for prudential reasons.


I guess my point is you can't throw the NYT in with the rest or the main stream press...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I will say it is better than any of the other publications
out there for sure.... I have war issues is all :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. as opposed to the tattered trunks the republicans carry around
what laws were broken by either man? Can republicans claim Democrats are as bad when they've tolerated Delay handing out checks on the House floor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just remember the Bizarro world rule:
Taking a bribe ... OK ... refusing a bribe and being cleared ... evil ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Iraq is one issue. Another issue is corruption and we should not be choosing
between two questionable men/women for this position.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. questions are fine
unsupportable accusations are another thing entirely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. True, but Murthasvideo tape is a bit "questionable" IMHO.
Not that he's guilty of jack, but it certainly gives us less credibility on the issue of ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. he refused the bribe
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Until later, context is everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. "for now"
but, he's not the whip so it's a done deal. I like Mr. Murtha, I just don't think that now is the time for him in this regard. I do hope he's put on a committee to end the war however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. no to everyone!
fuck the times..ohhh scary..."tattered baggage"-"crude master of pork-barrel budget goodies for campaign lucre" god dam that`s enough to get me to vote for the republicans ....fuck the times and their shit for brains writers. why in the hell does anyone care what they think -if they do-or write.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. The Democrats do not challenge the status quo...
in the media, as the right-wingers are prone to do. The right simply calls them the "liberal media" and ignores them. The Democrats take them more seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Can't they find someone better than these two? I like Murtha but he sure isn't perfect.
He should become a "born-again" ethics hawk instead of looking like a "good ole boy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. We Liked Them When They Unveiled The Swift Boat Liars And Exposed The DemocRAT Ad.
Were they wrong then and wrong now?

Were they right then and wrong now?

Were they right then and right now?


My head is spinning...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why are these are only two options? Surely we can come up with better. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. Geez - the targetting of Murtha, Dean and Kerry is MORE transparent everyday.
Some centrist Dems must have all the access they can get as long as they're attacking targetted Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. Damn, Murtha is scaring them shitless
Hoyer must be a real crony to the biased media. A great reason to vote for Murtha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. Hey NYT how's that record on Whitewater and the Iraq war ?
You should be spending your time washing all that blood off your hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. Gotta love that liberal media. They wouldn't be trying to influence the leadership
election with this hack job now would they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC