Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Define: Success In Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:34 PM
Original message
Define: Success In Iraq?
Can you, a lot of people say we need to achieve success in Iraq, but what exactly does that mean?

What yardstick do we use to measure success? What criteria do we use to guage whether or not Success has been achieved?

These are important questions that need to be answered BEFORE we come up with a plan to exit, because without these basic questions, any further planning is pointlesss and bound to go nowhere. We have to have an idea of what we are planning for before we can plan for it.

Discuss:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bring Them Home Now
That's my yardstick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Out of Iraq"
The *only* definition that applies to success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. When we're able to
move jobs there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. We have already...
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 11:41 AM by jasonc
there are lots of private employers doing business in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's the wrong question I think.
We all want peace and stability there. BushCo tries to frame the question as if we differ on this, but what we actually differ on is how to get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The appropriate question should be...
"just how many more dead US troops do you fuckers want?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. How we get there
is what I am asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. They have peace and stability in Iran.

So all we want is peace and stability for the Iraqi people? If we can achieve that by getting the people of Iraq to rally around their hatred of say, the United States, then that is all fine and jolly?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. And you would say, what,
that we want peace and stability only as long as we have access to the oil and basing rights for our troops? This is probably the implication of BushCo's "victory". WE must decide what is the proper makeup of a post-chaotic Iraq.

I can't even pretend to be smart enough to know what a good path through all this is, but I believe defining that path is going to entail more than just the US "deciding" what is right. Other groups, other countries, other leaders, should be brought in to help craft a plan. The community of nations has been through similar circumstances before. There have been lessons learned.

Some have been saying since before the invasion that Iraq would end up being partitioned, and I think we are still moving closer to that step. Hell, it was almost there with the no-fly zones before we attacked. Not sure if it is good or bad, but it seems more and more likely as time passes and factions continue to build resentment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who cares, let's just say "we won" and get out.
I believe we have to turn Iraq's caretaking over to an international body. The UN, for instance. And I think we have to contribute resources to that body, to correct our sins. But we need to be removed from power there.

That's my plan. Give Iraq to the UN (or whatever coalition can handle it), give the UN support and troops to use as they see fit, then get out and say "Now that we've achieved our goals in Iraq, let's fix New Orleans and FEMA and health care, before our own nation falls apart."

You are right, Bush keeps saying "we will win," but he never says what winning means. His only stated goal at first was to overthrow Hussein. He did that, but didn't leave. I'll reverse Bush's statements that the only way we can lose is to leave. The only way we can win is to get out. Until we do, our very presence there proves we have lost--otherwise, why would we still be needed there.

The only way to win is to leave.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Iraqi's choosing their own destiny
We should not have gone there in the first place, a fact conservatives conveniently forget about. Our kids should not continue to die which is only preventing Iraqis from choosing what the hell the want for their future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. no more people who don't like us...
whooops...wrong board. ;-)

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. there is NO "success in Iraq" there cannot be success in an endeavour
based on lies, and propoganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. With that attitude
nothing positive will ever happpen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. The 'publicans hidden agenda's 'success' = more-billions-for-the...
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 01:46 PM by Amonester
already-rich-1% defines their 'success' and they only add the 2 other words ('in' and 'Iraq') as a convenient (for them) spin. There never was, neither isn't, nor ever will be any 'success' for the ordinary citizen, worker, and taxpayer "in Iraq" but only 'losses' there.

Should be very clear to everybody who dares 'looking' at reality as it truly is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. What about
for the Iraqis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. Success for the Iraqis is aproximately the same as 'success' for
the Vietnamese was (and still is...), although they may have a longer period of infightings than the Vietnamese had before and after the imperialist invaders aknowledged their obvious defeats and ran away after murdering countless innocents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have never had a handle on
what 'Victory' in Iraq is supposed to be. I have never heard it clearly defined and I don't believe a definition exists.

It seems to be a moving target, once it was the capture of Saddam, then free elections (they've done that twice already), then a constitution, freely elected government etc. etc..

Now it seems to hinge on a capable army and police force. However, all they seem capable of is killing each other.

So, in answer to your question, there is, at least for the US, no such thing as 'Victory' in Iraq. I believe the US 'lost' this one a long time ago. The rest of the world knows it, and to be honest, we know it too. What we are trying to do now is 'save face' but it is too late for that also. Many more are going to die before we admit the truth and humble ourselves before the world.

We appear to have 'lost' Afghanistan too, but no-one mentions that. Sort of takes the edge off that whole 'super power' shit doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I did not ask what Victory is
I asked what defines Success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. Who's success?
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 11:51 AM by happydreams
Getting all the money out of the Treasury and into the Bush &Co.'s coffers is Bush's definition of success in conjunction with permanent occupation of Iraq and stealing of its oil.
The only part the Bushies will succeed in is the war profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Well,
I certainly dont care what Bush defines as an Iraq success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. Disarming the enemy -- But BushCo doesn't talk about that
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. To me, success would mean a free and stable Iraq
But that isn't going to happen while we're involved there in any shape, form or fashion. And even if we cut all self-serving ties immediately, it's unlikely to happen any time soon thanks to what Bush** has precipitated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Dictatorship or partition.
There's no democracy option when people want to vote each other dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes I can. Success at this point is that the Iraqis will still sell us oil when this is all over n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. Success


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. Success


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. Success
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Bwaaaaaa! Great Stuff TH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. For the politicians and generals, "success" = saving face.
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 12:58 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
No matter how many murders it requires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. That's because they understand the meaning of 'Teamwork'
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 01:15 PM by TahitiNut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC