RW spin - Dems not being bipartisan enough

[BushOut06]

I guess not automatically capitulating to the Dictator's demands - ie warrantless wiretaps, Iraq, etc - is now considered "not being bipartisan".

Clearly, to the Republicans, being 'bipartisan' means doing what THEY want.

[Richard Steele]

1. That's what it ALWAYS means to them. Same old, same old. nm

[bluerum]

2. Eff em. Eff em all the way to hell. nt

[texpatriot2004]

3. Get out! Shut UP! Oh no they didn't. Let's look at their record of

"bi-partisan" behavior, shall we?

[Metta]

4. They have no credibility. They sound like smacked asses.

They should be coming with their hats in their hands trying to convince us not to be put them in jail.

[Norquist Nemesis]

5. Let's play ball!

From what I've seen so far, the Cons need to look up the definition of bi-partisanship instead of using Grover Norquist's handbook of Rules to Lie By

[longship]

6. Sorry, Repukes. Maybe you can show us how to do it right.

Waiting...

[Rainbowreflect]

7. To bad they will have to learn they cannot have their way

all the time any more. :cry:

[don954]

8. the type of bipartisan they want:

we hug their elephant, they'll f!ck our ass....

[Arkansas Granny]

9. Kinda like a guy I used to date. He thought "compromise"

meant doing everything his way.

[independentpiney]

10. that seems to be a universal experience

I think most of us have had a b/f or g/f like that at least once.

[Ksec]

11. Its gonna get where we have to be partisan , like they were

I see no other solution when all they try to do is fuck with us.

They care only about winning. They dont care about doing whats right for America.