Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal officials sabotaged passenger screening at San Fran airport

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:24 PM
Original message
Federal officials sabotaged passenger screening at San Fran airport
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/11/17/BAG72MESP91.DTL


Federal transportation officials and a private security firm at San Francisco International Airport worked together to undermine a federal investigation of passenger screening at security checkpoints, according to a report released Thursday by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

For 16 months ending last year, Transportation Security Administration employees tipped off screeners from Covenant Aviation Security that undercover agents were on their way to the airport's checkpoints to test whether the screeners were properly inspecting passengers and their carry-on luggage, the report said.

Despite the charges, the private security firm was rehired two weeks ago with a $314 million, four-year contract at the airport to screen passengers and checked bags. Employees of the firm and the security agency were disciplined as a result of the investigation but none lost their jobs.

From August 2003 until May 2004, TSA officials and Covenant managers at the airport "notified screening personnel in advance when a tester was approaching a checkpoint and provided their descriptions," the report states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another case of rewarding the guilty; when will it ever end? And
that's some reward!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. $78.5M per year to screen passengers? Man, 9/11's a real $-Maker
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 04:36 PM by PeaceProgProsp
for a few luck companies!!!

And aren't they lucky that they don't actually have to do a good job in order to keep that gravy train rolling!

Where'd that money come from? Taxes on middle class people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The money came in the form of higher air fares
and airport charges on your tickets.

So, yes, in effect it is a tax on middle class people to fund the 'Security Circus' or 'Security Theatre' that takes place at airports and train stations.

If you'd like a look at how this is not working, go on over to the Travel & Security Forum at Flyertalk.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Okay, let's think this through...
An example: Husband goes out with buddies one Friday night. He stays up too late, gets hammered, spends the rent on strippers, then gets beat up outside the strip club on the way to his car. He manages to find his way home at 3:00 am, only to find an angry wife awaiting an explanation. So he says "Well, I was walking from the car to the condo and three guys jumped me and stole all my money and beat the crap out of me! I was so freaked out, I downed a pint of JD."

The wife buys it. She is freaked now, too. Their wonderful little condo complex has been infiltrated by gangs and thugs! She demands he husband DO SOMETHING! Write a stern letter to the condo board! Install new lighting in the parking lots and hire a bunch of new security guards. Nip this in the bud before it gets worse...

But in the ensuing days, she can't understand her husband's lack of enthusiasm for her new anti-crime initiative. Why won't he go petition the condo board for new lighting and increased security?

The answer, of course, is simple...he can't get enthused about thwarting crimes he KNOWS aren't really happening. He made them up!







Now, apply this scenario to 9/11 and George Bush, and his unwillingness to go along with a 9/11 Commission, or airport security, or any real measure to protect us, instead opting for secret illegal wiretaps and surveillance.

Getting the picture?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow. Heads should roll over this. TSA needs better accountability than this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. and yet
we keep hearing about and reading about how things are still getting through.. It's like the starwars tests.. even when they are "rigged' they still fail..

What does this tell us??

We can NEVER be 100% okey-dokey Double plus perfectly safe.

The thing that will save us from future problems is common sense.

We are lacking in that commodity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. ...but we sure can transfer a lot of money to wealthy corporations
run by Friends of Bushes in the process (which was the deal with Star Wars too, right?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC