Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RS: The cost of persuading a woman not to have an abortion is $336

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:41 PM
Original message
RS: The cost of persuading a woman not to have an abortion is $336
from Rawstory:

President Bush to appoint abstinence-only activist to oversee reproductive services

"President Bush will appoint an anti-birth control advocate of abstinence to oversee funding for reproductive clinics next Monday, RAW STORY has learned."

<snip>
Diggs, who has known Keroack for four years and has worked with him on human sexuality and sanctity of life issues, added that anyone who said they wouldn’t let their personal beliefs influence their judgment would be lying.

<snip>
Dr. Keroack has consistently opposed contraception, in sometimes what many would consider extremist forms. Planned Parenthood reports that, as a member of the Medical Advisory Council for the Abstinence Clearing House and Federal Expert Panel, Keroack defined the guidelines for grants from the Community-Based Abstinence Education Program. His requirements included that there be no discussion of contraception, or even sexually transmitted infections.

<snip>
He calculated that the cost of persuading a woman not to have an abortion is $336, according to an article published by National Right to Life Committee.


This really, really pisses me off. I am a woman with a daughter, and this sucks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am still angry - here is more:
Keroack's theory is that when a one-night-stand or cohabitation ends and the bonding is severed, oxytocin levels drop. “Many in this increased state of emotional pain and lower oxytocin seek sex as a substitute for love, which inevitably leads to another failed relationship, and, so, the cycle continues,” Keroack wrote.

The cure? Abstinence, and time to heal.

“If you have multiple partners, then the spouse is no longer significant,” Diggs said.


Okay - I had multiple partners when I was younger and I have to say - when I decided that my husband was one I could stay with, I was able to make that decision.

And, only ONE of my three children was planned. The other two were surprises, and we made the decision TOGETHER to continue the pregnancy and raise them.

ERRRrrrrrr...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. When this anti-contraception movement goes mainstream....
You'll find a lot more people getting PO'ed at these right-wing jerks, which can only help the Democrats. It's one thing to shed crocodile tears over fetuses, but to deny people contraception??

That'll go over like free tickets to go hunting with Dick Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think that while we do not agree with this idiot, he and a few more
like him in the next 2 years will let the voters see what they have been supporting. I do not think that every anti-abortion person is also an abstinence anti-birth control nut. When they cannot get their birth control pills even married pugs are going to see red turn to blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC