still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:12 AM
Original message |
Talk is that bush is going to call for 20K more troops to Iraq. Will the Dems do the right thing? |
|
I am not so sure
I suspect they will be split, and that would be most unfortunate
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:14 AM
Response to Original message |
1. They better follow through with what they promised. |
|
Remember it was THE PEOPLE, not one political party, that helped us extract our troops from Vietnam.
Keep the pressure on our Democratic Representatives. :thumbsup:
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. I agree, but here is my nightmare |
|
The Democrats will split because the repulicans will say anyone who doesn't want to send the troops to Iraq is not supporting the troops there, and does NOT really want to end the war
After six years of essentially doing nothing, the DEMOCRATS BETTER TAKE A UNITED STAND ON THIS
Forget any compromise, there will NOT be any. McConnel has already said if the Democrats do NOT accept an up or down vote on the judges, not to worry, because they need 2/3 to filibuster, and they cannot get it.
IF THEY DON'T STAND UP THIS TIME, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS THROUGH
I hope the Democrats words turn into action, and yes, the DEMOCRATS BETTER OPEN INVESTIGATIONS ON the lead up to the IRAQ WAR, the violation of the Geneva Convention, the illegal wiretaps, and so much more
|
jaysunb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. probably, but the Democrats better NOT sway their position |
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Bingo. Bush wins this one, by just proposing it. |
|
If the Dems deny Bush the troops, and especially if we pull out, Bush will blame the Dems for failing in Iraq, and he's off the hook (he was laying the groundwork for that in Viet Nam, with his "We only lose if we leave" routine). If we give Bush the troops, then we have a vested interest in the outcome, because then we have also escalated the war. Bush drags the Dems down with him, and that makes the Repubs look less bad by comparison. Interestingly, I think this proves that Bush knows it's a lost cause, because he is now just trying to do damage control.
We can't win this by playing the game. We just have to do the right thing and trust in Americans to understand it.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. You just said it, WE WIN BY DOING THE RIGHT THING |
|
and that means start getting out of Iraq
If anything, it is the countries in the region that need to settle this
We are a catalyst for disaster if we stay
|
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Agreed. And a bold move is the best way to counter a duplicitous one. nt |
lvx35
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. That's why its important we start making the MORAL arguments against |
|
the war now.
They can always blame us for losing, even though we have been in the war longer than we were in WWII with them in control, and with no results delivered...But once we have spoken the truth, that this war is immoral, than they can make no complaints about losing...There is no merit in winning an immoral fight.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
22. both the cayalyst and an ingredient |
izzie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
20. I may be mad also but your reasoning sounds reasonable. |
|
Bush has got to blame this mess on some one else.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
25. Americans have a short memory. In little time it will be "Iraq? Saddam? Wha'?" |
|
After all, even Bush is now in VietNam.
Peace. Now.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:18 AM
Response to Original message |
3. DEMS WILL DO THE RIGHT THING; BET ON IT. nt |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. We will see very soon. You noticed how quick they were to vote yes |
|
on supply nuclear fuel to India, which is indirectly proliferation of nuclear weapons
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:21 AM
Response to Original message |
4. They'll Do Whatever Jimmy Baker Says |
|
You can take that to the bank.
McCain just trying to grab some high ground, so he can say "I woulda' won" when we're all feeling bad about Iraq in 2008.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. The media is already saying that is what baker wants |
|
it is a MAJOR MISTAKE, and if the Democrats fall for this, like they did the lies that brought us into Iraq, then its time to form a new party
|
luckyleftyme2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
15. baker is a bush gopher |
|
Baker is like chenny,a go between. the man between the elected and the behind the scenes gang. They will have no silver bullet nor a plan to hasten the end of this occupation. Simply a smoke screen that will linger on.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 03:05 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Do they need congresses approval to raise the troop levels? |
|
They raised them a few months ago and I don't remember it being brought to congress, but I might have missed it.
|
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
and withholding funds right now is a political trap.
there will be other ways to leverage action. a combination of events and efforts.
|
luckyleftyme2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Bush now is going to change the course? Don't buy into this plan now it's to late.They dicked around doing everything they could to screw it up and prolong the stay in iraq. don't waste another american child in that god forsaken mess. pull them out and make an offer they all can relate to.if you continue your civil war and unrest we'll give you all forty virgins! Its time that section of the world felt the wrath of the american people!besides that the stockpile needs to be spent! even the iraqis are fighting over the oil.
|
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Uh.. how is sending more troops to die changing the course? |
|
Seems to me it would be escalating the freakin' course!
The PM of Iraq recently said that he wants the troops to stay on their bases for a few months. Sending 20K more troops will accomplish wxactly what?
|
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. Uh.. how is sending more troops to die changing the course? |
|
Seems to me it would be escalating the freakin' course!
The PM of Iraq recently said that he wants the troops to stay on their bases for a few months. Sending 20K more troops will accomplish exactly what?
|
MoseyWalker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 04:25 AM
Response to Original message |
17. they will go, and then |
|
they will be slowly "withdrawn"
there doesn't appear to be a draft on the horizon, just a few hundred thousand insane troops to deal with once this insane war is ended.
|
and-justice-for-all
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message |
21. A nice loud "FUCK THAT!" would be sufficent...nt |
Casablanca
(549 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 06:49 AM
Response to Original message |
23. No, the DLC will be too busy trying to screw Dean to even think about it. nt |
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message |
24. They need a congressional vote to raise troop levels? Since when? |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-18-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. They don't, but the Democrats have a responsibility to dsagree |
|
and do whatever they can to get us out of Iraq
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |