Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran's men are afraid of women

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:29 PM
Original message
Iran's men are afraid of women

http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level_English.php?cat=Religion&loid=8.0.360591216&par=0


IRAN: MORE RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED ON WOMEN


The hardline administration of president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday introduced new restrictions on women. In Iran's National Security Council, women must now work in separate rooms from men, and may not attend meetings with their male colleagues. Segregation in the school system has been extended to teachers as well as pupils: at all levels, girls' schools may only be staffed by female teachers, who may not teach at boys' schools and institutes.

In universities, where male and female students have for some time sat in separate areas, CCTV cameras have been installed to monitor contact between the two sexes. The first woman-only hospitals are due to open soon, the health ministry has announced.
------------------------------


how pitiful is that? what cruel sissys Iranian men are. what ignorant bullys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ayatollah Khomenei Said
"Whenever a man and a woman are alone in a room the third person is Satan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Satan is a construct - Khomenei was a religious con man
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's A Funny Saying Though...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. guess 'funny' is in the mind of the beholder

I think it's a stupid saying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Stupid...Funny...
But he has said a lot of funny or stupid things in my estimation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. The 'church lady' in my church
when I was a kid used to say the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
42. I guess you have to account for hormones somehow right:?
So according to Khomenei, satan=hormomes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess it must be real hard to defend Ahmadinejad now
But I'm sure some will continue to try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Can you please cite examples of support for Ahmadinejad on DU?
The only thing that comes to my mind is people pointing out the degree to which his statments are mistranslated in regards to Israel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I've seen some DUers suggesting that his "anti-imperial" stance
is the right one for the region. I don't have time to look up links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. So You Think An Imperial Stance/US Hegemony Is Right For The Region?
Ah-jad has little power. His position appears to be a mix of Senate Majority Leader and White House spokesman.

Oppression by the Iranian Government is a problem to be solved by the Iranian people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Look, I'm just not one who thinks that
Ahmadinejad is any kind of reasonable alternative to anything. Going from the status quo to whatever he has in mind would be going from bad to bad, or bad to worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rather like fundamentalist christians, really (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. nonono
they are such he-man raging warriors that they can't be expected to control their "urges". . .

pitiful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The chador, the original shroud, is still required in Iran for women too.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Not so...
Women are required to cover their hair, much like Orthodox Jews or certain Christian sects.
Modern Iranian women are no different than their European counterparts in the manner of style and dress, with the exception
of having to cover their hair.
Before the Islamic revolution, if you do not remember, Iran was the most cosmopolitan and modernized nation in the Middle East.
Tehran was oft compared to Paris. The revolution, like many other religious movements, turned society backward to ultra orthodoxy and shunned the modern trappings of the west.
It is now up to the PEOPLE of Iran, who are the youngest population in the World, to take their great country back from the grips of the tyrannical Mullahs and once again celebrate the glory which was lost.

Thanks for the chance to rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The law states that they must wear a full length coat and hijab
if they aren't wearing the actual chador.

There are multiple articles on this if you google (this is just one example) http://www.first48.com/guide/features/muslimcode.php

I know that Tehran used to be very cosmopolitan but even though Iranian women are trying to get around the clothing laws by shortening their coats in 2006, it doesn't change what is governmentally required and what most women wear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. You are correct. A headscarf and a "duster" coat, so
fashionable now here is sufficient covering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. But is not a chador
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 07:55 PM by Opusnone
as the post implied.

Chador
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A chador (Persian ????) is an outer garment worn by some Iranian women when they venture out into public; it is one possible way in which a Muslim woman may follow the Islamic ?ij?b dress code.
A chador is a full-length semi-circle of fabric open down the front. It is thrown over the head and held shut in front. A chador has no hand openings or closures but is held shut by the hands or teeth or by wrapping the ends around the waist.
Traditionally, a chador was worn with a headscarf (rusæri), blouse (pirhan) and skirt (doman) or skirt over pants (shælvar). The face would be covered with a long rectangular white veil starting below the eyes. (The modern chador does not require the long rectangular veil.) Inside the house, the chador and veil were discarded and women wore cooler and lighter garments.
Before the modern revival of the chador, black was eschewed for its connotations of death and funerals; white or printed fabrics were preferred. The current Iranian government, following the teachings of Ayatollah Khomeini, considers black the proper color for a chador. However, some women still prefer to wear chadors of different, lighter colors. Elderly rural women have disdained the modern fashion, and some young women indulge in colored chadors.
Iranian women are not required to wear chadors. Some do so, as wearing it is a claim to respectability and Islamic piety. However, women may also fulfill the government requirements for modest dress by wearing a combination of a headscarf and a long overcoat which conceals the arms and legs. The overcoat is known by a French word, manteau. Over time, many women have worn their headscarves further and further back on their heads, revealing more and more of their hair, and the manteaus have become more colorful and form-fitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Not not a chador. I have worn both forms of hijab there.
Either is acceptable. The chador is more desirable to wear at a funeral or in a mosque or a religious observance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yet not everyone is religious
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 08:03 PM by Opusnone
Just like in the US.

I think, and if you have the ability to look at my past posts, that there is a constant PR campaign against Iran being waged across our cable channels, blogs and newspapers.

I don't appreciate that DU is a part of it, but I understand free speech.

If the Iranians had free speech from inside their country outward to us, they would say the same things I do. I don't pretend to be their proxy, but I will stand up to planted stories and warmongering propaganda on this board as often as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I am not an observant Christian and am not a Muslim, but
did wear hijab out of respect when necessary before the revolution and out of necessity afterward. I knew lots of women who were not particularly religious. I have a lot of respect for the Iranian culture and the people and wish them well. It is quite often the case that leaders of nations war while their peoples would prefer to live in peace. I have not seen any warmongering on this board, but then again, I don't visit all threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's astonishing how many clergy are closeted
especially conservative clergy. They have to keep women away lest they're found out. Also, repressed and self loathing gays always consider that part of them that's attracted to other men "weak" and "feminine," and thus develop a visceral hatred of anything female.

They'd love to do the same thing here. They're already attacking contraception. Look at the lunatic Stupid put in charge of family planning in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harper_is_Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think your generalized attack on Iranian men is not legitimate.
Are all Americans Arab-hating war-mongers because of the actions of your Government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thank you for saying that before me.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Seconded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. Motion Is Carried n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. I was talking to an Iranian expat who is now a US citizen
She just traveled back to Iran to visit after now having been there for a generation at least.

She gave me the impression these rules are not really followed. Couples live together without being married, they have to wear the head covering, but wear an abbreviated symbolic one (like the doiley Catholic women used to put on their heads as a "hat" to go to church in) and that youth laugh at the mullahs behind their backs. They text each other all the time and apparently what they say in that context is safe from government prying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. They also party and do drugs
and have unprotected sex, and watch sports, and drink, and fight, and every other thing that human beings do.

The legality and public displays of these things are what differ from country to country.

ps Pizza delivery guys deliver booze to parties.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ohhh... Ohhhh.. I'm so torn!
Do I type a response attacking this post as a slander on ALL MEN? Or do I support the attack on Followers of Islam? Decisions, decisions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. When In Doubt Just Let The JDAMS Of FREEDOM Fly
Sometimes you just have to kill them to save them.

They are the 'other', after all, and I should detest them and be scared of them and want to liberate them according to Beck and Limpballs and Hannity and O'Reilly and . . .




Pretty amazing the effect the conditioning is having, isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hsher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Ahmadinejad needs to come out - look at this


Third panel. That's not a doctored photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Oh, for keerist's sake. I get so tired of this sort of thing.
In the Middle East, men and women greet members of their own gender with a kiss of peace. It serves the same purpose of a handshake in the west--a gesture of friendship. It is absolutely ignorant to equate it with sexuality in anyway. This form of greeting is an ancient one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hsher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Um, correction, my friend
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 09:03 PM by hsher
Have you lived in the Middle East? I have. For you to pretend by implication of your above statement that homosexuality does not exist in the Middle East, and that you know by absolute fact Mahmoud is not possibly homosexual and showing the often negative, typical symptoms of homosexual self-repression, is enough for me to say "oh keerist" right back to you on. The ancient male fraternal kiss exists enough, true - men hold hands and kiss on the mouth in Islamic countries; but add to that kiss Ahmadenijad's scurrilous phobia towards women and several other factors indicating possible sexual repression, and you get the conclusion that sometimes a cigar is more than a cigar. I appreciate your somewhat reflexive comment, but as someone who has spent time in Muslim countries and witnessed the vibrant manloving culture endemic to (all societies including) theirs, I politely disagree with you. You simply do not have enough data to conclude Ahmadenijad is NOT homosexual. So far there are two pieces of data we all collectively possess indicating he just may be.

Research the male sexual slave culture of Saudi Arabia, for instance. See if there are any Google entries on wealthy homosexual Muslim men's activities in the desert at night: such as driving anonymously to the open country and trading and buying attractive young men in the suqs. I know what I'm talking about. My father lived there for a half a decade working for the CIA.

The jury remains in, the question remains open and unanswered, and I tip my hat and bow out from further commentary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. I did not say that there is not
Edited on Sun Nov-19-06 04:50 AM by Skidmore
homosexuality in the Middle East. I'm just saying don't assume homosexuality because you see people of the same gender exchange a kiss of greeting. Lord knows, I've kissed other women there in greeting countless times and those exchanges did not constitute a sexual encounter. Nor does it necessarily follow that the habits of "wealthy Muslim men" are anything but that.

Also avoiding members of the other gender does not necessarily constitute a "phobia". I would argue that more often than not it reflects observing the societal mores in public. Lots goes on behind closed doors there, and if you are engaging in an illicit relationship, you pray you don't get caught because the sanctions are extremely severe. It does not follow without question that not hanging out with women in public if you are a devout practitioner of the faith means that you are "phobic" or a homosexual.

You make an additional mistake in extrapolating Arab practices to Iranian culture. Iranians are not Arabs and would take issue with being called so. They have a distinct and separate culture, with many divergences, including religious ones.

Men and women over are slower to sexual maturity. Marriages are arranged when a man has some success in a trade or a career. Hence, there tends to be an age differential between men and their spouses. That does not imply that the man is inexperienced with women necessarily. Have you heard of the existence of siqeh marriages? Concubinage is safety valve that has beendeveloped in Iranian society. It is more like a form of legalized prostitution in which a man may contract with a woman for any period of time from 1 hour to their lifetime. He enjoys all the benefits of being married. However, these women and children born of such contracted relationships cannot inherit upon the man's death. I've known a number of such couples.

Lastly, do not ever assume that because, as a Westerner, you've been admitted to the family, that you indeed know the intimate details of the family. There is a reason why life goes on behind walled compounds in these nations. It is to maintain the privacy of the home and family. You may be a guest there but that does not mean you know jack squat about the relationships or the domestic issues in that family. Period. Westerners assume too much and are too willing to fill in the blanks based upon our cultural norms rather than just admitting that we do not know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Many American Men As Well (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Bushco wants to attack Iran for the wrong reasons
A real man--or woman--would go into Iran to liberate women from male oppression. Or at least that's what i'd do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes horrible. (pictures of the horror).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Women hold 30 seats in the Iranian parliament. How many women in the US congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. You Are Being A Real Buzz-Kill In This Two-Minute Hate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. LOL. These things are hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QuestionAll... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. some men (in very powerful positions) are afraid of women, globally.
and pass that onto their pleebs in many messages in so many ways, all over the world, mostly for politcal gain like that big succubus Religion thing, or the Football thing, or anything that is male dominant membered.
after all, how can one invent missiles and catapults and glorious works of art ,all that kind of stuff if they had to clean up after themselves or have to look after their squawking children...

comes down to birthing. jealousy of birthing, jealousy of giving life, so they will take it instead - in heinous ways throughout the centuries. Kill the goddess mother earth. Let swords reign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC