Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exactly why is Tom Cruise's marriage "breaking news"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:17 PM
Original message
Exactly why is Tom Cruise's marriage "breaking news"?
MSNBC broke into regular programming to show the outside of the castle where the marriage is taking place, with big"BREAKING NEWS!" fanfare. Then the commentator announced they THINK Tom and whomever are now officially married.

I never cease to be astounded at the farcical nature of American "news". Just when it seems they can't dumb it down any further...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because we still don't know what happened on 9/11/1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. OBL isn't thawed out yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because that's what the public is interested in.
If the public was NOT interested in stupid crap like this, we wouldn't have six million mindless magazines and TV shows based on exactly that.

Mindless blather sells, even if we're not interested in it. Unfortunately, many, many, MANY people are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. But I wonder if the media provided us with real news and interesting
commentary, whether people wouldn't rise to the higher level. People are so used to drivel that it's what they've come to expect and like. Same as those who go to McDonald's every night. They don't know what good food tastes like, so they THINK they prefer junk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Celebrity worship has been around roughly as long as celebrities
I think there has always been - and will always be - a segment of the population that is more interested in that than in "real" news. Myriad alternatives are already available, and real news is available to anyone who seeks it. Some people just have no interest in trying very hard to find it. Or are simply disinterested in reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. IA, but there was a time when it would not have been "breaking news"
and relegated to the Entertainment Section.

Why is it this important now? Because of the 24/7 media?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. TV has become "merely wires and lights in a box"
Edward R. Murrow (from "Good Night, And Good Luck") talking about the future of television:

"To those who say people wouldn't look; they wouldn't be interested; they're too complacent, indifferent and insulated, I can only reply: There is, in one reporter's opinion, considerable evidence against that contention. But even if they are right, what have they got to lose? Because if they are right, and this instrument is good for nothing but to entertain, amuse and insulate, then the tube is flickering now and we will soon see that the whole struggle is lost. This instrument can teach, it can illuminate; yes, and it can even inspire. But it can do so only to the extent that humans are determined to use it to those ends. Otherwise it is merely wires and lights in a box. Good night, and good luck."

Were it not for Keith Olbermann, Mr. Murrow would be turning over in his grave by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. And all this talk about "Scientologist weddings are normal."
For the last week, every MSM "news" outlet has been gushing about Scientology weddings and how they are perfectly normal and just like any other. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. If Tom and Kat didn't bother to fill out the necessary
paperwork with local authorities, as seems to be the case, this whole thing is a big farce anyway. He must be paying Katie millions to go along with this charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pyrzqxgl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Tom & Kat are"shackin' up" and the kid's a bastard, so what's new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Because every wedding involves frying pans for women and untrustworthy men.
:eyes:

Seriously.... the vows involve admonishing the groom to buy the women "frills" like frying pans and combs and cats. :shrug:

And the women are told not to expect men to keep promises, which no doubt casts a wonderful glow upon an exchange of vows.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because he has excellent publicity agents. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Exactly. Like, WTF do we care about Paris Hilton or Madonna's baby?
I agree totally. I figure Madonna lets the TV network show her films for free, almost all of which have been ranked "worst movie of the year" in each of the years they were released. Is there ANYONE ASKING to see "Who's that Girl" on HBO?

Thanks to these publicists, I'm thinking, we're supposed to think there are like, what, 10-15 celebrities in the WORLD?

..and just why the FUCK should I care about Nichole Richie? Does she act, sing, dance, write, etc?

It honestly makes me sad when I think of the thousands of actors and actresses wanting to get noticed, wanting a chance - actors with REAL talent.

I'm not saying that Tom Cruise doesn't have ability, but I think things are WAY out of proportion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's control damage to rescue/ressuracte Cruise's low popularity caused
by his past behavior, that's why the fairy tale wedding especially to regain his popularity amongst the female-folk...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eauclaireliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. RE: Exactly why is Tom Cruise's marriage "breaking news"?
Exactly why is Tom Cruise's marriage "breaking news"?

Because the thousands of U.S. and Iraqi dead in the ME is not as important, donchaknow. That's they way the elite want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. as usual i'm out of the loop again, didn't know they were getting
married and now that i do i don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Yeah! And for that matter, just who is this "Cruise" fellow, anyway?
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 02:48 PM by Seabiscuit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. People are morons. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is what Richard Dreyfuss alluded to yesterday on Bill Maher
I hope that his comments are posted someplace. They need to be heard and discussed again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is beyond nonsense n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherMother4Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Stupidest piece of crap news I've heard in a while. Our soldiers are
dying, Iraq is being devastated, and this is what is considered "breaking news" Shame on CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. MSNBC as well
Breaking News used to be something important. This is so fugged up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Really, who the fuck cares?
Too bad that cute little baby has such nimrods for parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's INFOTAINMENT.
The modern version of Bread and Circuses.

Somebody needs to start a real news service. It actually might make money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. That would be Al Jazeera English..Check it out..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Peppier than Darfur, perhaps? Easier to digest, they think? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. U.S. Deaths Confirmed By The DoD: 2865 / 2 more today!
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 02:47 PM by Breeze54
Because the MSM is trying to distract you from what matters.

As they've been doing...

Or maybe it's this they don't want you to get angry about!!

====================== :grr:

Army Unit to Serve Third Tour in Iraq

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6223911,00.html

Saturday November 18, 2006 11:31 AM

By ROBERT BURNS

AP Military Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -

The Army's 3rd Infantry Division, which helped lead the charge to Baghdad at the outset of the war,
will return next year and become the first Army division to serve three tours in Iraq.

More at Link...


:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Because if you jump on Oprah's couch, everyone wants to watch your wedding?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yes, that's got to be it.
Now I understand. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agentkgb Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Apparently
Mass media will cover what they think people want to know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. Evidently there are not enough
people being killed in Iraq today, and besides they must have something to vie with the latest flap on O.J. Simpson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. With 24/7 media they probably do have to look for things to
talk about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. I started watching TV again recently...
Mostly, I just leave it on when I'm cooking. I have seen way too much about this shit. Did you know that she spent $12,000 on underwear for the wedding? (!!!!)

This damned wedding is going to cost 9 million dollars!

It's time for another French Revolution. Let's just get rid of all these worthless genetic celebrities, off with their heads. I don't care if he's a Democrat (or so he thinks). He and whatshername are two talentless overpaid hacks that tear down our society by turning its values upside down.

Class envy? Fuck, yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Ha, ha I agree
Off with their heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Don't forget.. Poor people around the world watch OUR tv
and when they see shit like this, imagine what they are thinking..

and we wonder why they have "issues" with us:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. It's not to me.
I seldom watch those channels unless a DUer says, "you have to see this!".

I get my news from the internet but I go to the print media, the newspapers that have websites.

You should too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC