Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breast-feeding case leads to punishment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:35 PM
Original message
Breast-feeding case leads to punishment
Breast-feeding case leads to punishment

Fri Nov 17, 6:25 PM ET

BURLINGTON, Vt. - A commuter airline has disciplined a flight attendant who ordered a passenger off a plane for refusing to cover herself with a blanket while breast-feeding her toddler, the airline said Friday.

Freedom Airlines spokesman Paul Skellon did not specify the discipline in an e-mail announcing the action against the employee who had Emily Gillette, of Santa Fe, N.M., removed from the plane Oct. 13 at Burlington International Airport.

Gillette, 27, said she was breast-feeding her 22-month-old daughter in a window seat in the next-to-last row, with no part of her breast showing and her husband between her and the aisle.

The flight attendant tried to hand her a blanket and told her to cover up, Gillette said. She declined, telling the flight attendant she had a legal right to nurse her daughter. Breast-feeding is protected under state law.

The case received broad news coverage this week, days after Gillette filed a complaint with the Vermont Human Rights Commission. On Wednesday, about 30 parents and their children protested the airline's treatment of Gillette by staging a "nurse-in" at the Burlington airport.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061117/ap_on_re_us/breast_feeding_passenger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. good
That flight attendant was extremely out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
I'm sick of the prudery over breast-feeding in this country. It's the natural way to feed babies, for pete's sake, get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. F'ing freepers are mostly upset over this - sheesh
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1740773/posts

They wouldn't like my wife who breast fed on planes for 2 years (she flew several times a year).

Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUSTANG_2004 Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
38. Not as much as I would have thought
I looked at your link, and there were a large number of supportive comments as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
81. Moranic freeper comment of the day:

"She's lucky that they didn't arrest her under anti-terror laws."

Gee, and I thought they were afraid of Muslims!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katzenjammer Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. What's moronic about it??!? He's right, she *was* lucky some dork didn't do that to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good to hear.
I just don't get people who are embarassed or offended by public breastfeeding. It's not a lewd or sexual act; it is a mother feeding her child, period. People need to get over themselves about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boolean Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a wonder these fundies can breed at ALL
How do they even have sex? I would think they'd be ashamed of themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's not "sex" if you're trying to make babies.
I used to go to a fundie church (:scared: ), and all they liked to talk about was how we are all sinners, bad, nasty, dirty, blah blah blah. Sex was only for the purpose of procreation, and there was never any talk of pleasure, etc., especially where women were concerned.

Ack! Gotta stop talking about it. I'm going to give myself nightmares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katzenjammer Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
86. Right. Sex is nasty, dirty, and vile. So save it for the one you love.
And they don't even get the irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. The flight attendant must be oviparous.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Reptiles usually are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. (Uhmmm..) Well, this one's a flying animal ... so she feeds her kids by
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 05:37 PM by TahitiNut
... going home and vomiting into their mouths. :evilgrin:


Air Sickness Bags ... not just a convenience. Lunch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. 22 months old. The woman has problems.
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 04:56 PM by IsItJustMe
Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with woman breast feeding, openly or otherwise (discretion is not a bad thing though, for me anyway). but honestly, when should it end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. no, she doesn't
It isn't uncommon to breast feed for many years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Not really - avg weaning age the world over is 4 years
You should nurse your baby as long as it’s working for the two of you. Both the World Health Organization and Canadian Paediatric Society now recommend that babies be given breastmilk exclusively for six months with complementary foods added at that time. Then they recommend continuing to breastfeed for the baby’s first year and beyond. LaSalle points out that the average weaning age in the world is four years old and cites the benefits of nursing an older baby, which may include a decreased risk of obesity, diabetes, eczema and night blindness, as well as lower cholesterol and decreased risk of heart disease. “The long-term effects carry on into adulthood,” she says.

http://www.todaysparent.com/pregnancybirth/breastfeeding/article.jsp?content=1089676
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I would respectively disagree.
Babies who breast feed for over a year are found to be anemic, over clinging to mother (which may result in emotional developmental problems), general lack of nutrients in there body and other problems. Up to a point, it's a great thing. But as with anything else in life, there is a point of diminishing returns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. They are not talking about exclusively breast feeding though
which is different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. OK, I had a cousin who breast fed her daughter exclusively up until the age of 4.
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 05:16 PM by IsItJustMe
She ruined that kid. I think it was sort of a religious issue with her. All in all though, to me, it was a form of child abuse.

Anyhow, I do believe that breast fed is the best fed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
58. By "exclusively" do you mean the child had no solid foods at all?
That would be unhealthy. Toddlers need solid foods for iron, at least.

But I suspect you mean the child had breastmilk instead of cows milk. Which is fine. Nobody needs cows milk, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. LOL I'd LOVE to see some links to back up your ridiculous claims
"Over clinging to the mother"? "Emotional developmental problems" WTF? You can't be serious?

Oh, and as for a "geeral lack of nutriets in there body and other problems", you do realize that breast feeding is the only way a child at this young age has a immune system, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #44
82. Not to mention that the human race did it this way for millenia
and only recently has been able to get around the absolute necessity if breastfeeding!

So that comment above would make most of humanity in the past to have been out-of-whack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
55. I highly doubt that, it doesn't make evolutionary sense
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 07:25 PM by Odin2005
Humans evolved to breast-feed for 4 years. The "overly clingly to mom" assertion sounds like nothing more then Western cultural bias about how kids are supposed to behave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
75. Can you cite any studies.
This seems contrary to my training in early childhood development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I'm not sure I understand you.
Are you suggesting that it is odd that the woman is still breast feeding her 22 month old baby? Both the WHO and UNICEF suggest that women breastfeed their babies for *at least* two years. La Leche and AAP do not state an upper age range.

22 months is not that unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Might be a good time for a poll on it here (ie how long) :) (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. You're obviously not a mother
and it's NOT your decision. MYOB, as Dear Abby would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUSTANG_2004 Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. Probably just not informed
About the health and psychological benefits of extended nursing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Clearly not. And PROJECTING
that mom might be "getting off" on it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. I'd say it's YOU who has a "problem"
Feeding a 1 yr, 10 month old breast milk is pretty standard throughout history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Most women, I would think, would not want a 22 month old child hanging on them.
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 05:30 PM by IsItJustMe
Additionally, after a certain point, breast feeding no longer benefits the babies needs, but rather the mother. That seems like a possible problem.

And I would also bet you this: That this women is a Christian Fundamentalist and will home school the child when it gets old enough to go to school; so that it won't be corruted by all of them, so called filthy libs, out there. I've known a few of these folks in my life.


Bottom line though, whatever gets you to the light, is alright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. what, any ole 22 mo old? Or their CHILD, that they gave birth to?
Are you being serious here? You want to disagree with the World Health Organization, hundreds of millions of mothers, and basic biology, based on some person you know who, as you've said, is clearly out of the mainstream? And I'll take the bet. If you're right about her, I'll give $100 to a charity of your choice. If you are wrong about her, you'll donate $100 to La Leche League. Ok?

btw, here is what the WHO has to say about breastfeeding:

Breastfeeding is an unequalled way of providing ideal food for the
healthy growth and development of infants; it is also an integral
part of the reproductive process with important implications for
the health of mothers. As a global public health recommendation,
infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of
life to achieve optimal growth, development and health. Thereafter,
to meet their evolving nutritional requirements, infants should
receive nutritionally adequate and safe complementary foods while
breastfeeding continues for up to two years of age or beyond. Exclusive
breastfeeding from birth is possible except for a few medical
conditions, and unrestricted exclusive breastfeeding results in
ample milk production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I'll give you this much
My statement was obviously to broad in scope. There are many variables involved in deciding when it is time to quit breast feeding. All that I wished to point out is that moderation in this area, as in any human enveavor, should be taken into consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. yep, too broad, ill-informed, etc.
All that I wished to point out is that moderation in this area, as in any human enveavor, should be taken into consideration.
Ok. Where in this thread did anyone advocate an extremist breastfeeding agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Exactly WHAT would YOU know about it
beside NADA??? What does it matter what "YOU" think "most women" would want??? The woman in question made a decision to discreetly nurse her child through a new experience. What does it matter to YOU??? You seem fixated on the idea that mom might be "getting off" on it. All of your assumptions are SICK, SICK, SICK. May you remain single forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Hey, everyone has a right to an opinion.
I am not so arrogant to believe that mine is right, founded in ultimate truth, or anything else. It's all good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. Opinions are like assholes
everybody has one. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. 'Tis true
... sometimes I wish I didn't have to be exposed to them:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. Yes - and yours is poorly thought out. Y'know, even if this baby was 90% off
the breast, this might have been that 10%. And what a smart time to do it - it comforts the baby, keeps it quiet, helps its ears adjust to the change in air pressure, all of which makes for a happier trip for EVERYONE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
66. Excellent points, mondo joe.

My mom always said "There's nothing like a good bust in the mouth to quiet a baby." ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. And everyone has the right to have opinions about people's opinions too.
That's how it works. Say something ridiculous, get smacked down. And so the world turns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Well so much for liberty and personal choice -- if it's not what "most women"
would want, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
45. please do not speak for other women
My mother breast feed me until I was 4 and both of us agree it was one of the best bonding experiences ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. that's what's funny-- that's a man telling us what women want! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. he's a man?
I did not know that.

Wow. That makes it even more appalling :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. I missed my chance to say it Austin Powers style....
"That's a MAN, baby! YAH!"

there. I did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
52. Please. What does being a fundie have to do
with extended breastfeeding? Plenty of DU'ers have nursed toddlers -- I've spoken to many of them. In fact, I'm one of them. You can't ever have breastfed yourself or you wouldn't call it "hanging on them." You have no idea what you're talking about.

You're either a guy, who is jealous of the idea that a baby might get first priority on a woman's breasts, or you're a young woman who has no idea what it is like to have a baby or to breastfeed. You can't be an older woman or you'd know that all babies and toddlers -- nursed or not -- do a lot of hanging on. And mothers (and fathers) like it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
67. Most liberals breastfeed their kids. Fundies are latecomers to the

breastfeeding party. All us hippie types were doing it 30-40 years ago and the fundies were grossed out about it back then.

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
76. Oh, honey.
My son is 22 months old and still breastfeeding. If we were to get on a plane this month, I know he'd nurse on takeoff and landing just to relieve inner ear pressure.

And I'm not a religious fundamentalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
84. WTF?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. I'm sorry, it seems that you have the problem. I breast fed my oldest
son until he was 22 months and he 19 now, and has always been exceptionally well adjusted. He weaned himself when he was ready, as did my younger son on the eve of his first birthday (he's 16). Both of my children had no anxiety separation issues, they have always made friends easily, are smart and independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Sounds like the problem is yours. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. indeed
Jesus fucking christ, I never knew a completely natural function of motherhood could be so fucking controversial.

Fucking pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
73. Not to mention that someone keeping their kid quiet on a plane would
be so frowned upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
50. Almost major health organization in the world recommends at least 24 months
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 07:22 PM by gollygee
do you think you know better? Based on what?

I corrected the title because I forgot about the American Academy of Pediatrics, which says at LEAST a year but as long as wanted after that:

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that "Breastfeeding should be continued for at least the first year of life and beyond for as long as mutually desired by mother and child... Increased duration of breastfeeding confers significant health and developmental benefits for the child and the mother... There is no upper limit to the duration of breastfeeding and no evidence of psychologic or developmental harm from breastfeeding into the third year of life or longer." (AAP 2005)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
51. Both the WHO and UNICEF says it should continue till AT LEAST 2 years.
Worldwide, the average age of weaning is between 2.5 and 6.

The American Pediatric Society recommends breast-feeding continue until at least 1 year, and fully supports extending nursing as long as the mother and child want to.

People who think a 22 month old is too old are the ones with problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
65. No she doesn't -- you do. The Worl Health Organization recommends

breastfeeding for 2 years. That's 24 month so this mom and baby aren't there yet. And many mothers and babies prefer to continue brestfeeding beyond 24 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spacelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
78. Yes, I am afraid it is just you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
83. The longer, the better, for mom and child.
A woman can reduce her risk for breast cancer 4-5% for each year she nurses, and may be able to continue lactation amenhorrea and protect against pregnancy without birth control pills. The baby continues to receive immunoglobulins that protect the child against infection, leukemia, diabetes, and helps lower cholesterol levels as an adult.

I nursed my first through age 3, my second age 4. Of course, they started solid foods in the middle of the first year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. this is such a ridiculous issue
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 04:56 PM by stellanoir
So a mom has to wear oversized shirts for a short while, cradles their kid underneath their shirt, and generally offends no one.

Yikes.

A kid's gotta eat ya know?

So much healthier for the kid as well of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Some people look to be offended
I have seen many, many nursing mothers in public places (gasp!!!) and unless you really, really, REALLY tried, you'd *never* see a peep of tit.

But most people are idiots....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
36. It's true.
I remember nursing my new baby at the gym while we were waiting for a post natal excise class to start. I was sitting on a couch wearing long pants and a long sleeved, high necked, baggy shirt with the baby under my shirt and just his little legs sticking out. A woman on the elliptical trainer five feet away was wearing short shorts with her butt cheeks hanging out, bare midriff and plenty of cleavage showing, too. Guess who the old biddies glared at every time they came around the indoor track? You guessed it, Me! I guess I was supposed to feed my baby in a toilet stall or something so they wouldn't have to deal with the offensiveness of seeing a woman feed her baby, meanwhile nearly neked lady on the elliptical is just dandy. Sheesh.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. probably a slap on the wrist, unfortunately.
Hopefully this won't be an issue on planes in the future because of this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. Well, I don't think termination would necessarily be appropriate
if this was the flight attendant's first offense such as this. I think re-education/training of the flight attendant is appropriate along with a note in her file.

But, if it was a repeat offense then termination is fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. I dunno...actually telling the women to get off the plane is pretty serious
I mean, you have to be a terrorist or something to be taken off the plane.

But you're right-- if this was a first offense, re-educate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. Left unanswered in that story: is the mother satisfied with the action?
The flight attendant was disciplined, Delta put the family up for the night at a hotel and flew them out the next day. I wonder if the mother wants more remedy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
39. Breast feeding blurs the line between
Humans and animals. So stop it already.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeremyWestenn Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
56. The attendant was right to ask her to cover up.

And naturally instead of doing the logical thing, which is to cover ones exposed body, she decided to turn it into a different issue that she would be completely correct in fighting. You're trying to stop me from breast feeding. No. She wanted her to cover her boobs and let the baby suck away. That simple. Instead of arguing what actually happened these people are, disingenuously, trying to act as if the incident was over something completely seperate. She didn't tell her to stop breastfeeding, but to cover herself up or get off the plane.

I'm behind the flight attendant 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. She was covered. And in the back of the plane. And...
Her husband was in the seat between her and the aisle. Are you now going to argue that the child should eat under a hot, stuffy blanket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Why the fear of boobs? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. It isn't a fear of breasts, per se
In the regressive mind, breasts = sex = bad. But the equation is confounded by another one: breasts = fun = good. So the mind is at odds — ergo, breasts = bad, since the regressive mind cannot rationalize the dichotomy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Yeah, about the boobs...
...you are aware boobs = food, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. First, the article said no breast was showing
so it wasn't about boob viewing.

Second, it's just a BREAST. What's the big deal about seeing a bit of breast? Women dress in clothing that shows quite a bit of breast pretty regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. Sick, sick, sick...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. "boobs"..."suck away"....does breast feeding TITtilate you or something?
Why such sexual words to describe mealtime? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #56
68. Obviously, you need to go back and re-read the article, which

clearly states that no part of her breast (breast -- not boob) was exposed and that she was in a window seat with her husband next to her in the aisle seat. Who was offended? The flight attendant noticed the baby had her head under mom's shirt --OMG, cover up, cover up! Cover up what?

I'll bet the flight attendant reveals far more of her breasts at the beach, and you'd approve of that, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. I love a good pile-on!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #56
74. Could you be MORE misinformed? She wasn't exposing her body.
And there was no reason for her to use a blanket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #56
77. You're apparently ignorant of the fact that her boob wasn't showing.
You eat with a blanket over your head and see how much you like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laundry_queen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #56
79. Oh yes.
Because boobs that are partially exposed while breastfeeding are way offensive, while those titty mags at the newstand before you board are A-OK!!
What a fucked up society we live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. It's so idiotic. You'd have to look REALLY HARD in most cases to even see any
breast while a kid is nursing.

One of the dumbest phobias in America today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
70. I am surprised no one noticed the irony
freedom airlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
71. I feel like I'm at a La Leche League meeting already :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
72. Ridiculous
If only the airlines would address something that really matters...my god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC