Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need statistical help in beating down a GOP sorry-ass lying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:48 PM
Original message
Need statistical help in beating down a GOP sorry-ass lying
dick-head. He hates generalizations towards the Repukes -- but submits to me that "George Bush and all Republicans exalt the effort of the individual - individual responsibility, individual success and individual achievement where as the liberal left exalts the power of government and the state."
:puke:

I am looking for a laundry-list of statistics/facts that refute this BS. Deficit numbers and increased gov't spending, individual loss of freedoms, failure in the wars... hell, there is too much ammo for my mind to even put together a coherent response.

Any one care to help me put this ass-wipe in his place? I'm not feeling up to snuff today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Have An Entire Site Dedicated To This
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 06:30 PM by MannyGoldstein
BlueWorksBettter.com - statistics comparing outcomes of Liberal and Right-wing policies.

Try: http://blueworksbetter.com/PresidentsGDPGrowth , for example.

(Seems to me that the evidence shows that George Bush and all Republicans exalt in body bags and poor outcomes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you Manny! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Thank you for creating that site -
I'm adding it to my favs!
emdee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Great site
I like those statistics a lot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Page not found, it's the ","
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 06:31 PM by madmusic
EDIT: Just visited. Great site!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks! I Updated the Post (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Great info, Manny. Bookmarked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbernardini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. But those nice folks at newsbusters.org said you cooked the books!
:sarcasm: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Manny, here is a link with info you might be able to use at your site...
...about market returns that contradicts Republican talking points.

http://finance.yahoo.com/columnist/article/futureinvest/3022

Average Annualized Stock Return from 1948 to Feb. 2006

Democratic Presidents 15.26%
Republican Presidents 9.53%
Overall 11.95%


Since 1948, Republican Administrations have controlled the White House 57.2 percent of the time. But during the period that the GOP was in office, stock returns have averaged only 9.53 percent per year, while under Democratic administrations, stocks returned 15.25 percent per year, more than five percentage points higher.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. That was perfect! Thank you, thank you. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just tell the asswipe to review 2000, to 2006!
and see if "George Bush and all Republicans exalt the effort of the individual - individual responsibility, individual success and individual achievement".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. If GW values the individual so much
why is he using the power of the state to force individuals who's enlistment has expired to continue to serve in Iraq against their individual will?

If the individual is so important to the Republican why are they using the power of the state to make decisions about what medical treatment can be given to an individual who was raped?

And if individuals are to be exalted in their successes then why do Republicans insist on punishing homesexual individuals with successful relationships?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Its not up to you to prove him wrong, ask him to "List a few examples."
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 06:14 PM by niceypoo
I deal with this shit all the time bantering with repubs in my political chatroom. I have a one size fits all answer for all their talking points,"List a few examples." Ask for specific examples of where Bush did anything to further individualism and not for cronies or corporations. The thing about talking points is that they are made to sound good but they are shallow and baseless, so when you ask for examples to back their claims they generally dont have any. This works at least 90% of the time.

}( }( }( }( }( }( }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. it's kinda hard to acheive that much as an individual
These rich Waltons and Gates and others in the Fortune 400, did they really do it all by themself or did they have alot of employees working hard for them?

What about the power of gold?

and what about the accomplishments of the state that benefit us all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. This is a very good point.
If all those kids that joined the military to escape poverty hadn't been willing to do then, then who would be fighting in all those wars designed to enrich the ultra wealthy throughout the world? or join the national guard to shoot those unruly uppity poor people decide to revolt and demand economic justice.

Where would Bill Gates be if there weren't any asian sweatshops building computers?

Where would the Rockfellers be if there weren't chinese immigrants in the 1800's breaking their backs for peanuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks all for the responses... much
appreciated!

:toast: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. BD12..see my post to Manny (#15) in this tread about market returns.
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 07:44 PM by Minnesota_Lib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well, If He Believes That Effort Should be Rewarded,
he should take the position that wages should be taxed at a lower rate than passive income such as interest on bonds and savings, dividends, appreciation of property, and rental income. Instead, Republicans continually argue for a lower capital gains rate, which rewards passive income. The reason is that Republicans support those who are already rich, not those who are trying to better themselves through their own efforts.

If you ask one of these low-tax people for a balanced budget that represents their values, they can't do it. Not even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC