Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mitt Romey. He Was For Abortion Before He Was Against It

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 05:23 PM
Original message
Mitt Romey. He Was For Abortion Before He Was Against It
Seems like the Republican field is crowded with abortion flip floppers seeking to dupe the religious rightwingers yet again.

Romney should be hit with this everywhere he goes.

From BlueMassGroup:



http://www.bluemassgroup.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3351

Let's take another look at Romney's "evolution," shall we?

1994: Mitt Romney is running against Ted Kennedy for US Senate. Here's what he said then:


I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a US Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain it and support it.


2002: Mitt Romney is running for Governor in Massachusetts. Here's what he said at that time:


Believing in people is protecting their freedom to make their own life choices, even if their choice is different from yours. Accordingly, I respect and will fully protect a woman's right to choose. That right is a deeply personal one, and the women of our state should make it based on their beliefs, not mine and not the government's....
The truth is there is no candidate in this race who would deny the women of our state abortion rights.



He also said that "I believe women should have the right to make their own choice."

2006: Mitt Romney is running for President (not officially, but come on). Here's his position now:

I am prolife. I believe that abortion is the wrong choice except in cases of incest, rape, and to save the life of the mother.



In that same op-ed, Romney equated "life" with "conception." And he went further, stating not only his personal views on abortion, but also stating (though not in so many words) that Roe v. Wade should be overruled:


I believe that the states, through the democratic process, should determine their own abortion laws and not have them dictated by judicial mandate.


And he even said he would have signed South Dakota's outrageous law, which would ban abortion except to save the mother's life (no exception for rape, incest, or the mother's health).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately, the kind of brainwashing...
...an individual undergoes on the road to fundihood irreparably damages their critical faculties. All some sleazy politico like Romney or McCain has to say is that they changed their minds because God came down on a sunbeam and told them that abortion was wrong, and the fundies will be writhing on the ground in ecstacy, ready to vote for yet another God-annointed candidate who has 'seen the light.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. True
but in the case of Romney, he has yet to be framed for most Americans. He is currently a blank slate. If we show him to be the opportunistic flip flopper that he really is, it will make many fundamentalists rightly suspicious of him (which they already are because he's Mormon) and it will destroy him with moderates.

We have to define him before he defines himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
Edited on Sun Nov-19-06 05:33 PM by Hav
I guess that alone will give him no chance during the primary. He can try to change his "views" according to the views of the Repub base, but when he said that 4 years ago, his opponents will enough ammo against him for the case he even comes close.

But it also shows what a sellout he is. He said what he needed to say to win in a state like MA. Now he says what he needs to say to win the religious right. Some nice values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC