Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bye-Bye to Secret Spy Program - (US NEWS)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:18 AM
Original message
Bye-Bye to Secret Spy Program - (US NEWS)
Bye-Bye to Secret Spy Program?
Why the fate of President Bush's eavesdropping program is dangling by a thread
By Liz Halloran

Posted Sunday, November 19, 2006

Republicans who limped back to Washington for a lame duck congressional session last week found a host of marching orders from President Bush, but perhaps none more urgent than this: Before Democrats take control of Congress in January, they must pass legislation authorizing the National Security Agency's domestic eavesdropping program.

His plea for a legislative stamp of approval on the controversial spy effort is an "important priority in the war on terror," Bush said. The response: deafening silence. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist quickly dispatched aides to put out the word on Bush's request: Not gonna happen.

Outgoing Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter introduced yet another bill last week that he says would ease the concerns of privacy advocates while allowing the spying program to continue, but the odds of getting any last-ditch legislation through his committee, the House, and a Senate vote before Republicans cede control are formidable.

So after nearly a year of high-stakes wrangling on the Hill, heated debates over privacy and presidential authority, and a flurry of lawsuits against the administration and telecom companies for allegedly aiding the surveillance program, Congress appears to be back to square one. And with Democrats promising oversight hearings next year on how the program was hatched and whom it targets, it appears likely that the issue will be decided in court and, ultimately, the Supreme Court.

more at:
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/061119/27surveillance.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Procedural question:
Even if it's passed in this session, can't it be de-fanged, or repealed entirely by the next Congress?


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Frat-boy has but to then wield his veto pen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ok, the next president, then ?
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 09:30 AM by hippiechick
:shrug: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. what is really "Deafening is the ROAR of MegaaGoliath paper shredders.. before th Dem take over
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 09:28 AM by sam sarrha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Program isn't dead, he just has to obey the law
and get warrants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emald Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. if we as a country can't stop this unconstitutional program
then we are done as a country. This little pResident has broken our constitution, the very thing he is sworn to uphold. This must be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. So is FICO totally out the window now?
They found they did not wish to abide by existing law so ignored it. Is that Law now defunct? Congressional Laws do not seem to stand up well to this Administration, beginning with "Presidential Papers Act" which was an Act of Congress (Law) that the Administration immedialtely threw out the window upon entering office. They could not allow Reagan's papers to become public knowledge because so many of the actors are in the current Administration and everyone knows how corrupt Reagan's Administration was...Funny how not one single member of Congress is willing to object to the total disregard of Congressional Laws...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katzenjammer Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, is it being stopped?
I get the impression that the illegal spying will continue, and that the Dems have no intention of stopping it, but will merely hold "hearings". Am I wrong (I hope!!!)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubykc Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's my understanding that the program will continue until...
such time that the courts put a stop to it. It was declared unconstitutional but they were allowed to continue the program while it is appealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Too Much Crap To Flush...It's CYA Time...
Thanks to Hastert's 3 day work week, there's only 6 working days left in the two weeks after Thanksgiving and the end of the session. Hopefully, the only thing we'll see passed by either body are continuing resolutions that would just freeze where things are now and play out the clock.

If there is any wheeling and dealing by Repugnicans right now it's covering their asses. Warantless wiretapping takes a back seat to making sure their special project or pork or special interest who writes the check get one last shot...and then it'll be a glancing blow at best.

Remember, no budget had been passed...as usual...and without at least a continuing resolution passed, the government could shut down. Either way the GOOP is screwed. They'll opt to covering their own asses and letting booshie boy's priorities twist in the wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Republicans know they have to survive after Bush.
They know what the voters thoughts are on this unconstitutional grab by the Executive Branch. Some also know that the next President will most likely be a Democrat. Their longterm interests do not line up with Bush's. 2008 is looming on the horizon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. A lot of really nasty stuff is gonna die young over the next few months
Poor little fascists, no more rubber stamp. And Repukes are going to be terrified to vote for ANYTHING Smirk wants because it will come up again when they run for reelection. Even if the Dems can't get certain things through, they will get a lot done by simply letting nasty shit die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC