Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 Things That Always Happen Whenever A Woman Takes A Leadership Position

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:04 PM
Original message
10 Things That Always Happen Whenever A Woman Takes A Leadership Position
Now that the hysteria over Nancy Pelosi's "first major stumble" has died down a little bit, I thought I would just warn everybody that as long as she's Speaker of the House, there's going to be a lot of this shit, so you better brace yourself.

Why? Because she's not going to be a good Speaker? No; because whenever a woman takes on a position of leadership which involves supervising a lot of men, she will be attacked. Constantly, and until she quits or retires. These attacks take many forms, but I thought I would explain what the 10 most common ones are are now, so everyone doesn't have a cow when they start turning up in the media, on Capitol Hill, and on DU.

1. Everything that goes wrong on her watch will be her fault.

2. Any mistake she makes will be magnified in the media by a factor of 1000X.

3. Good things that happen as a result of her leadership will go unreported--unless there is a male colleague involved somehow who can take credit for them.

4. Men who are supposed to be working with and for her will attack her openly and covertly.

5. Her opposition (within and outside of her own party) will portray her as a shrill, autocratic, power-mad bitch.

6. Oh, and she's ugly.

7. Any evidence of disagreement within her own party will be treated as the first rumblings of the inevitable mass uprising against her regime.

8. The fact that she is a woman will never become unremarkable or irrelevant and will always be cited as a likely explanation for her mistakes and failures.

9. She will suffer for doing unpopular things which need to be done to ensure the functioning of the organization, but which none of her male colleagues have been willing to do because it would not benefit them personally.

10. She will be set up to fail.

Why do these things always happen? Because no matter what people will tell you with their lips, in their hearts a lot of men do not expect to have to answer to a woman, do not enjoy it, and do not think that it is right or natural. I guarantee you right now that there are men holding Democratic positions in the House of Representatives who are willing to damage the party's political effectiveness in order to create trouble for her. It's not smart, but it's the way of things.

Does this mean that putting her in charge will necessarily be a disaster? No. Pelosi did not get to where she is by not knowing how to negotiate all of this bullshit. She will expect all of these things to happen and she will know how to deal with them. I'm just laying this out here in the hopes that it will forestall a few coronaries amongst the members of the DU community. Really, people, be forewarned: she will be attacked early and often, NO MATTER WHAT SHE DOES. Don't get all End Times about it every time it happens.

C ya,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. true
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't Forget
She's the wicked witch of the west.

I seriously hope women get behind her and refute all the bs, every thime it happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. In that case, I hope she will turn that asshole into a toad!
One would think the myths regarding women's capabilities have long been laid rest. It is the year 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. If you mean Bush, isn't he a toad already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eviltwin2525 Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
76. She turned me into a newt!
er, um....
I got better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #76
100. One of her most notorious predecessors was a Newt!
Seems like the wicked witches and wizards have been around for some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
43. Men need to support her as well. As long as only women
are expected to help her refute BS, they will all be marginalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tragically true, and what a f***ing shame it is!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. one more...
Any reporting on her will contain non-sequitors about what she's wearing, how many grandchildren she has and what her husband does for a living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. Indeed, and she will be referred to as "Nancy," not by her last name. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
66. Sigh...
Yeah. They already made some big deal about how she wears Armani. Like it matters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. you forgot...
she will be continually trivialized - by constant focus on her 'clothes and style' rather than serious focus on her message and actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Yup. Rather like black quarterbacks are invariably only "great runners" to white folks.
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 12:56 PM by BlooInBloo
People REALLY like their boxes. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cripes....
The US seems to be even more neurotic about women than the rest of the world, even virulently patriarchal third world nations. India did fine with Indira Gandhi, apparently not needing to vilify her at every turn. Germany's got Angela Merkel, Britain had Margaret Thatcher, though her politics sure stunk. Finalnd had (or has, I don't know which) a woman president. The US is *more* than ready for the same. The longer we hold off, the more neurotic this country will get. We need strong women leaders for the mental health of this nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. You forgot one of the first
Golda Meier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Yes, Golda!
How could I forget Golda Meier? And there are more women leaders, I just don't know them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Even PAKISTAN has had a woman PM, for chrissakes!
Hardly a beacon of feminist enlightment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. a woman who was taken down
for doing the same things that men did every day of the week and twice on sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
48. Chile has a new woman president. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
86. Imelda Marcos? Evita Peron?
Er, ah, just mentioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #86
89. No, they don't count....
Imelda Marcos and Eva Peron were the *wives* of leaders, not leaders themselves, no matter how impressive they may have been as individuals or how much influence they had on their husbands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. OOps! My Bad!
I thought both of them assumed power for a short period of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
50. That's cause there's
way too many Good 'Ol Boys here.:crazy: These guys need to get with the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
75. For the mental health of the nation AND THE WORLD we need a more women
Edited on Tue Nov-21-06 01:07 AM by Raster
in leadership roles. Before a woman would start a war, she would consider the death of someone's children. To her, soldiers would be more than raw materials for the war machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, but what's with her hair?
:sarcasm:

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Suggested edit on #1:
from:

Everything that goes wrong on her watch will be her fault


to:

Everything that goes wrong on her watch demonstrates her weakness.


rationale:

I think that the "weakness" thing is more the media/republicans' point that fault. The CW is that women are weaker than men - that's the perceived flaw they attempt to nurture and project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sad but true. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 12:20 PM by Annces
Even the "progressive men" will rankle at her. A woman should be an underling and she is "too bossy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. perjoratives to watch for
Only used with women in power

shrill
bossy
harpy
ugly
dowdy or the opposite - Gucci-wearing
hysterical (root word same as with hysterectomy)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
49. aggressive, silly, soft, hard, demanding,
matronly....

No matter what she does, it will be wrong. I believe that is how patriarchy views women...PERIOD. I learned that lesson long ago and decided to do what made me happy cuz in the eyes of the patriarchy no matter what I did was wrong.

Her clothes will be either too feminine or too butch...same with her words, her mannerisms, her policies.

But I have the utmost in confidence in Speaker Pelosi...she will do a better job than most men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
94. Read David Broder
You should do a degree read David Broder. He you shrill to compare her preelection speaking tone to her post election speaking tone. Either he or a few other have also made other demeaning statements about her, like questioning whether she would deball the majority leader or the majority whip. So I think another thing that should be high on the 10 things list is that she will try to takes all men's manhood away from them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. And she will survive beautifully.
The look, make that gleam, in her eyes thrills me every time I see her. I should hope to have that myself, someday.

Maybe I'm naive, but I have no fear (and I'm sure you don't either) that she will be invisible to the threats against her.

After all, she is a thoroughbred. Can I say that? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. 2nd Lt. Emily Perez, 23
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 12:28 PM by TahitiNut


:cry:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. What a smile! She's beautiful, Tahitinut - is she yours?
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 06:12 PM by JudyM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #55
65. 2nd Lt. Emily J.T. Perez
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, September 27, 2006
WEST POINT, N.Y., Sept. 26 -- They remember Emily Perez in her many bursts of motion: the diminutive young woman calling out orders to the freshman cadets on the castled military campus of West Point.

They see her sprinting the third leg for Army's 400-meter relay team. Or in the school's gospel choir, filling her lungs and opening her mouth to sing.

Emily J.T. Perez, a determined 23-year-old from Prince George's County, rose to the top of her high school class and then became the first minority female command sergeant in the history of the U.S. Military Academy.

Now she has another distinction. The second lieutenant was buried Tuesday at the academy, the first female graduate of West Point to die in Iraq. Perez, a platoon leader, was killed while patrolling southern Iraq near Najaf on Sept. 12 when a roadside bomb exploded under her Humvee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #65
73. Jeez. That is so sad. All of their deaths are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #55
70. I should be so lucky ... and unlucky. (She's all of ours.)
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 11:50 PM by TahitiNut
She's Emily Perez, a September fatality in Iraq - a 2005 graduate of West Point, she was an incredible young lady. For me, she's emblematic of the evil wrought by the Bushoilini cabal in their abominably criminal abuse of the world, our nation, and our young people here and in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #70
79. I agree, TN
and appreciate your posting this beautiful, vibrant young woman's picture. She would no doubt have had a successful career, regardless of whether she chose to remain in the military, or pursue another field. The loss of people like her is a great tragedy, and just one more sin to add to the already crushing load of evil which can be added to Bush and his war-mongering neocon's burden. What a terrible, terrible loss to the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #70
102. Every Time I See That Picture
That smile so full of the joy of Life, the evident promise of a young person...tears come to my eyes. It reminds me of the line from M*A*S*H which finally sent me down the road to pacifism.
"There are certain rules to war. Rule Number One is: young men die. Rule Number Two is: doctors can't change rule number one."
As long as Rule Number One is in effect we cannot afford to spend our children's lives meaninglessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
93. West Point Buries 'Class of 9-11' Cadet
West Point Buries 'Class of 9-11' Cadet
WEST POINT, N.Y., Sep. 26, 2006
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/26/ap/national/mainD8KCQG801.shtml
AP) The first member of West Point's "Class of 9-11" to die in combat was buried at the military academy Tuesday, two weeks after she was killed by a bomb at the head of a convoy in Iraq.

2nd Lt. Emily Perez, 23, was leading a platoon when a roadside bomb exploded Sept. 12 south of Baghdad. She was the first female West Point graduate to die in Iraq and the highest-ranking black and Hispanic woman cadet in the school's history.

"She was like a little superwoman, so full of energy and life," said Meghan Venable-Thomas, a senior who was on the track team and in the gospel choir with Perez.

The academy's Class of 2005 is called the "Class of 9-11" because the 2001 terrorist attacks occurred just weeks into the students' freshman year.

"I think we all hoped it wouldn't happen," said class President James Freeze of the first death among the graduates, who numbered exactly 911. Half of the class remains on duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Perez was a Medical Service Corps officer assigned to the 204th Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division in Fort Hood, Texas.

Dozens of cadets watched as she was buried in the West Point Cemetery. After accepting the folded American flag from Perez's coffin, her mother leaned over, put her forehead on the casket and whispered.


Perez was fluent in German from growing up overseas. She also played the clarinet and helped start an AIDS ministry at her church. Before leaving for Iraq, she donated bone marrow to a stranger.

"One of the things important to Emily was not the fear of death, but the fear of not living," the Rev. E. Faith Bell said after the service.



:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
103. Her picture and story were in the Denver Post
in their Portraits of Valor section - a weekly feature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Very true. And she'll be called by her first name the whole time.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Aided and abetted by legions of "good DUers" who see no slight in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
37. As opposed to Denny, Newt, or Tip?
We call male speakers by their first name too. :shrug:

But on the floor of the house, she has to be called "Madam Speaker". Not even the dumbest, most right wing congressman would yell "Hey Nancy!" during official house proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. We do. But talking heads don't.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. You'll see the John Knox's of the present day rise up
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 12:34 PM by SemperEadem
covertly, of course...

"The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women" 1558 by John Knox

To promote a woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion, or empire above any realm, nation, or city, is repugnant to nature; contumely to God, a thing most contrary to his revealed will and approved ordinance; and finally, it is the subversion of good order, of all equity and justice.

In the probation of this proposition, I will not be so curious as to gather whatsoever may amplify, set forth, or decor the same; but I am purposed, even as I have spoken my conscience in most plain and few words, so to stand content with a simple proof of every member, bringing in for my witness God's ordinance in nature, his plain will revealed in his word, and by the minds of such as be most ancient amongst godly writers.

The Empire of Women is
Repugnant to Nature

And first, where I affirm the empire of a woman to be a thing repugnant to nature, I mean not only that God, by the order of his creation, has spoiled woman of authority and dominion, but also that man has seen, proved, and pronounced just causes why it should be. Man, I say, in many other cases, does in this behalf see very clearly. <14>For the causes are so manifest, that they cannot be hid. For who can deny but it is repugnant to nature, that the blind shall be appointed to lead and conduct such as do see? That the weak, the sick, and impotent persons shall nourish and keep the whole and strong? And finally, that the foolish, mad, and frenetic shall govern the discreet, and give counsel to such as be sober of mind? And such be all women, compared unto man in bearing of authority. For their sight in civil regiment is but blindness; their strength, weakness; their counsel, foolishness; and judgment, frenzy, if it be rightly considered.

****************

that is what she's up against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. Oh, wow, buried treasure...now I see the double entendre in Terry Pratchett's book title
("Monstrous Regiment", that is.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
87. I went to a women's college
There was a line on the masthead of our newspaper, sorry I forget the source,

"Knowledge in the hands of a woman is like a sword in the hands of a madman."

Call me crazy, but I AM armed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. And finally...
If you want a job done right, give it to a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Whenever I hear the "women can't be good leaders" BS
I merely remind the speaker of Queen Elizabeth I and Queen Victoria in Britain. Seems to me those two kicked some major butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. How did Golda Mier keep rein on those
men that had to answer to her? And Margaret Thatcher?

Do you guys think that if the woman is definitely attractive or considered attractive, then men are even more resistant to her authority? Sorry, was still thinking about Golda Meir and Maggie Thatcher....two women who were not thought to be physically attractive and were able to keep men under their thumbs (in their parties.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. Many of these points...
Namely 1, 2, 3, 7, 9 and 10 apply to Democrats in general now that we're in the age of Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. And if she's not ugly, she had plastic surgery.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. You know that's one's coming
There is no other sin bigger than a woman who dares to assert herself and doesn't seem to care if she's called "ugly" or "unfeminine".

Unfeminine = espousing any opinion that would differentiate her from a doormat.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. any mistakes she makes will be used....
as reasons why NO OTHER WOMAN should ever hold the job, either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. Don't worry Nancy's from Baltimore so she won't fail
Hey she could be President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. This makes me think of an old quote I've heard:
Charlotte Whitton:
"Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. Or for a woman to be able to do as crappy a job as
the white guy....that'll will be the day I look forward to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canadian Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
67. Ah, Charlotte Whitton
One of my heroes from my youth:
Charlotte Whitton, OC (March 8, 1896-January 25, 1975) was a noted Canadian feminist and mayor of Ottawa. She was the first female mayor of a major city in Canada, serving from 1951 to 1956 and again from 1960 to 1964.

Whitton attended Queen's University where she was the star of the women's hockey team and was known as the fastest skater in the league. From Queen's she became the founding director of the Canadian Council on Child Welfare from 1920-1941 (which became the Canadian Welfare Council, now the Canadian Council on Social Development) and helped bring about a wide array of new legislation to help children.
<snip>


She became well known for her assertiveness and for her vicious wit with which many male colleagues, and once the Lord Mayor of London were attacked. She is famous for the quotation: "Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult."

Whitton never married, but lived for years with her partner, Margaret Grier.

In 1967 she was made an Officer of the Order of Canada.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Whitton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #67
85. Thanks for that. I had heard the quote many years ago, but I
didn't know anything about Charlotte Whitton. She must have been quite a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
69. or . . .
"Ginger Rogers did everything Fred Astaire did in heels & backwards!"

Bumpersticker philosophy. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. They'll make mean comments about her clothes.
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yep, and as usual, you put it into words
what many of us think. I'm already angry at the attacks on her and how few see the misogyny behind them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
33. yeah, but that's just because
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 02:26 PM by Retrograde
she's really a frustrated bull-dyke (because she obviously hates men otherwise she wouldn't be taking *their* job) who just needs a good man and a passel of babies to put her on the right path. Any vaguely close friendship with a woman will be seen as proof; any relationship whatsoever with a man will be seen as proof that she's trying to hide in the closet. (Sound familiar, Ms Clinton?) The Dieties help the first openly gay woman to hold national power!

IIRC, Pelosi is a grandmother (I know she has a daughter who makes films, don't recall her other children), which I'm sure will be held against her somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
35. A Few More Additions
Also, everything she does, no matter what it is, will be cast negatively: If she consults with other Democratic leaders and seeks opinions, then she is "weak," "indecisive," "doesn't know which way to turn," "isn't a leader," "can't make up her own mind," etc., etc.; if she states the official Party position on something and takes the lead, then she is an "autocrat," "presumptuous," "can't work well with people," "uppity/pushy," and there is always dire concern for what the "poor castrated males" think about this, etc., etc. If she tries to make peace with the more moderate Democrats, then she is "an opportunist," "no core principles," and we wait eternally for the media-anointed "liberal/left-wing revolt"; if she stands up for progressive principles and behavior, then she is "politically correct." Always "weak" and "trivial," no matter what the situation or issue. Also, there will be endless comments about, "her voice is annoying and, somehow, just, not right," and, "what is with her hair?" and other all-purpose "just to throw her off" jabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
60. As a woman in the business world, I couldn't agree more. And you forgot 'bitch,' too.
Not all guys recognize how fine the line is that we have to walk in order to maintain credibility and respect. A hint too assertive, you're a bitch. Take an unpopular position, you don't understand the realities of the business world. Ask for input, you're indecisive. And people don't have your back as readily as they do with guys. It's so weird. Not that this has happened to me directly but I've seen it *plenty* through the years. Seems to be getting better with younger folks, though, fortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
36. Also, a majority of this criticism will come from other women.
It's always the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. 11. Pelosi and Sen. Clinton will be the new "face" of the Democratic Party.
Instead of bringing up people like Reid, Kerry or Gore, Pelosi and Clinton will be seen as the "leaders" of the Democrats, despite the fact that only one of them is in a leadership position.

All Democrats will be guilty by association with Pelosi and Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. In fairness
don't forget that she was UNANIMOUSLY elected Speaker by her colleagues in a secret vote. And in the Democratic Party it is next to impossible to find unanimity on ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
42. You are absolutely right
2, 5 7 & 8 have already happened. I read the "shrill" word today in fact by a female GOPer.

I thought I was imagining things but it helps to have it all spelled out like this. It is so predictable. I do not doubt that she can handle it all though.

She's the Jackie Robinson. She is taking the heat for all of us and any woman that comes after her. Just another part of the game I guess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petunia.here Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
44. I was quite impressed
with how quickly the shrill wicked witch crap started. So sadly predictable.
It makes the name callers look so pathetic. Seriously, all I picture are little flatworms squirming in pond scum.
I have to admit, there was a little part of me that was hoping it wouldn't be so fucking blatant and empty of any kind of subtance. I mean, after all, we're supposed to have progressed or something. :sarcasm:
So much more work to be done. So few women in power to do it. ;-)

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
45. good points all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
47. The pugs will be going after her big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
53. At least they can't say "It's her time of month."
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 05:51 PM by Ms. November
and I doubt she suffers from menopause any longer, so maybe we won't hear any remarks on that subject, you know, raging hormones furrchrisssake.

I think yours is an excellent post, thanks.

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #53
83. Boys are dumb. It's guaranteed to get said at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
54. Great post!
We had a discussion at dinner last night how there are all these "new standards" for Nancy Pelosi that never existed before she became Speaker.

Your post said it all for me and thanks for putting it down into words.

Everyone, get off her back! Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
56. You are absolutely right
As a woman who has worked most of her life in jobs traditionally held by men, I know exactly what you're saying. You can't just be good - you have to be the best. You can't just be competent - you have to be extraordinary. And even so, there will always be people who will find a "reason" for that - "a man taught her", "a man thought of it", "she had it easy."

I used to play a lot of pool in the 70's. I found, in my observing of bar games, that the worst possible male player on the planet got more respect than the best woman. When that crappy male player lost, his opponent would invariably shake his hand and say, "Good game." If I lost, I got condescension and a sight of every man around high fiving. If I won, it was because he was "off his game." :eyes:

But I'm tough. And so is Pelosi. She knows which way the wind blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
57. Sad but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
58. yeah, bastards
they just don't get it. Seriously, I've about had it with those knuckleheads in the power elite.

Seriously! Get a clue, guys! Clocks move FORWARD, into the future, not backwards into the KITCHEN!!!

Oh, and by the way, get your own damn coffee!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
59. This male says...... TRUE TRUE TRUE
so true... our media sucks.

Might I also add (without taking away from this thread) that the same could be said
for out gays and lesbians... everything that goes wrong with them is blamed on their
sexuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
61. Don't forget: if she gets mad, she's "obviously PMS-ing."
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
62. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gwerlain Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
63. Personally, I'd rather work for a woman.
They generally do a better job of managing than men do; men want to play power games. Women want to get work done, and when someone insists on playing politics rather than working, they tend to get snippy. I like to work, and I hate politics. Maybe it's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #63
96. I've worked for both and sex just doesn't seem to matter
I've had both male and female great bosses, and male and female unhinged bosses. Neither sex has a lock on good managerial temperaments.

But as to what you pointed out about efficiency, Gwerlain, my boss and I (who are both women) got to the point where we could predict the length of any meeting at a giant Fortune 500 company which was our client: it all depended on the number of men involved.

- No men and any number of women - 30 minutes or exactly how long it took to deal with the business at hand - most of them just wanted to deal with the issue and get out of there and get home at a reasonable hour to their families.

- One man - any number of women - same (30 minutes) because the man didn't have to prove his authority to anyone - he assumes the women in the room KNOW he's top cock

- For each additional man, add 10-15 minutes for them to "strut their stuff" and show the other guys how big they are

We always checked, and damned if that's not how it usually worked out.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
64. Every time she has a disagreement with another woman...
it will be "deeply personal" code words for cat fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #64
92. Code words? No -- they will CALL it a cat fight
and any disagreement with a man or woman will make her "catty".

I've already seen it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
68. Sad, but accurate.
The first division of our species is male/female. The final battle within our collective will be fought on this plane.

Women know who they sleep with. Men can only guess who we sleep with. That men can't be confident in the bloodline of their heirs infuriates some types. Some days I think the fact that women could survive with a sperm bank & no men makes some men more violent & misogynistic than they already are.

The second division would be race, although, I've read & am inclined to believe, that race is a cultural construct.


Harr! Too much sci fi on this girl's mind! ;)

Good post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopeisaplace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
71. Never underestimate a woman
1. Everything that goes wrong on her watch will be her fault.

1A. And if everything is her fault, she'll take responsibility


2. Any mistake she makes will be magnified in the media by a factor of 1000X.

2A. She'll completely diffuse the orgasmic media by being the first to own up to her mistakes


3. Good things that happen as a result of her leadership will go unreported--unless there is a male colleague involved somehow who can take credit for them.


3A. She will be the first to speak about and give credit for a magnificent handling her male colleague did with such task.


4. Men who are supposed to be working with and for her will attack her openly and covertly.

4A. She will acknowledge such attacks head on, then divert to the truth.



5. Her opposition (within and outside of her own party) will portray her as a shrill, autocratic, power-mad bitch.

5A. She will not hold that against them, and point out the principles of democracy, and how they have the right to speak their mind, and she will continue leading, and get back on subject. If they
continue to push this issue..it won't look good on them.



6. Oh, and she's ugly.

6A. Her only comment, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, my family thinks I'm beautiful..once in a while, and grin.


7. Any evidence of disagreement within her own party will be treated as the first rumblings of the inevitable mass uprising against her regime.

7A. She will point out that any party where everyone agrees all the time, isn't a party, it's a cult. She's proud to be associate with a party that inspires and encourages debate.



8. The fact that she is a woman will never become unremarkable or irrelevant and will always be cited as a likely explanation for her mistakes and failures.


8A. She will point out that success or failure is not a product of being male or female, it's a product of how well or not well a job is handled. She will be the first to cite her successes
as a product of her ability, not that she is a woman. Same goes for her failures.



9. She will suffer for doing unpopular things which need to be done to ensure the functioning of the organization, but which none of her male colleagues have been willing to do because it would not benefit them personally.


9A. And she will point out that many women who are raising children especially understand what it
means to do something unpopular, such as grounding their teens..further pointing out that being a
disciplinarian/leader in the house is often unpopular, but absolutely necessary for the smooth running of the house.


10. She will be set up to fail.

10A. She's way ahead of the curve on this one. She knew this the first time she tried out for something in school. She has been adapting, and thinking ahead of this cliche, passed this cliche,
and chuckles at those who repeat it.



Hey, I had to respond to this. Women rule :) I'm the mom of four boys, the only women in the "house". All I can say is "no sweat". Bring it on.




















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
72. She is a tripple treat: aldo a democrat and a liberal. So, what you said, times 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hsher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
74. You forgot she'll never be thin enough
And her size and her daily diet will be watched like hawks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
77. so many DUers are completely clueless about rampant sexism
I hate to say it, it sounds so cliched but THEY JUST DON'T GET IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
78. This is more than a bit misguided.
Much of what is happening to Nancy Pelosi has happened to male Democratic leaders. John Kerry, for one, was a war hero literally turned by the media into a traitor to his country. Howard Dean, a brilliant man and an accomplished medical doctor, was turned into an ape because of the fact that he had an excited outburst.

The top 10 list format is repetitive, uninformative and (worst of all) horribly pedestrian. Everything is listed -- maybe she shot JFK? It is also disproven by the fact that Pelosi was elected to the Speaker of the House by her fellow Democrats, both male and female, unanimously. If all men were constantly working against her, none of this would have been possible.

The corporate media has completely ignored the milestone of her being the first woman Speaker of the House, and this is a crime. But they never hesitate to honor Republican women. Part of the difference in treatement is due to the fact that the Democrats have actually nominated a woman to run for Vice President, and this would never happen with the Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freeusfromthechurch Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
80. Damn girl, tell it like it is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
81. I choose rather to think
that she will rock.

I've no doubt America will benefit from having women in more leadership positions.

I agree that she will be beset.

I hope that she will turn just the right phrases, at just the right times, and without any hint of spite, when her detractors venture to harm her.

I believe we'll see some good things happen. I have faith that as her work unfolds, the indisputable truth will put her detractors in a bad light, and deliver new awareness to millions.

If anything you have predicted has bearing, then she had better make strides without apology.

I wish her luck, and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
82. I'd like to believe that we could dispel some of your....
Presumptions. Just because Nancy is a woman. Though we are not evolved to the point of being gender blind. Yet, after a year of competent leadership; I do believe she will be judged far more on her character then her sex. Things WILL GET BETTER for her. It's called maturity; both as a leader and for those that watch her as a leader. Gotta start some where, and I'm thrilled my 17 year old daughter can see the first woman as Speaker of the House. All our daughters deserve to see that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
84. catfight!
any disagreement with another female is a catfight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawn703 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
88. Ugly?
She is anything but!

:loveya:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
91. That's the media all right...although historians are smarter
Usually historians see effective female leadership for what it is.

I have to LOL remembering a letter to the editor a few years back...the writer ranted on about how "women are trying to wear the pants" in society and that women could never be effective leaders. He went on to say that America needs to go back to the values of the 1611 King James Bible.

I wrote back, "Women can't be effective leaders, huh? By the way, from whom did King James inherit the throne?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
95. Sadly, all too true.
We've already seen it in spades from the right. Goodness help us when she starts to be eaten alive by her own...oh wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recovering democrat Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
97. Unfortunately, this is accurate
I wish it wasn't, and hope it will eventually go away, but this kind of behavior in dealing with women of power is far too common.



And Lt. Perez. Another awesome woman. Rest in peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
98. 11. And she has NO fashion sense.
I mean WHO dresses this woman?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
99. Trent Lott wished for Hillary to be struck by lightning
(snip)

After she was elected, Trent Lott, the Republican leader at the time, voiced a widespread sentiment—held by more than just Republicans—when he mused, not unhopefully, that lightning might strike her before she arrived.

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200611/green-hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Gauger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
101. I hope you are wrong.
Of course, you will probably be right. I have been wondering why everybody in the media has been making such a big deal about the fact that she lost out on the Majority Leader position. They make like this is the end of hear tenure as Speaker. Yeah, it will be a problem that a rival is now Majority Leader, but it's not the end of the world. Everything I have seen has been so negative towards her. It's astounding. I guess she will be in for quite a trip over these next two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
104. kick for truth-telling nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC