WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:41 PM
Original message |
The politics of Rangal's draft idea |
|
First, I fully understand Charley Rangel's draft proposition. He feels that if we have the draft that people will consider more carefully than we have the last 30 years questions of war and peace--if it includes their kids and not somebody else's.
That said, the politics of the idea stinks. If a Democratic proposition to bring back the draft is one of the first things to come out of the new Democratic House and Senate I think it would doom us in 2008. Bush would probably veto it and it would be a big issue in '08--"Dems want to bring back Draft".
My guess is that many democrats know this and it won't get anywhere.
That said I admire Rangel for what he is saying and a part of me agrees with him.
|
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. This needs to be said over and over again, because some people here |
|
seem to think that either:
a) the average citizen will be smart or aware enough to appreciate the politics behind it
or
b) that any kind of draft, should it actually come to that, would be remotely fair, or that somehow the rich would be compelled to serve if called, because its "the right thing to do"
both positions are incredibly naive.
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
11. Amen. Very, very naive. n/t |
Options Remain
(475 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. actually the best way is to install a War Tax |
|
That requires all Profits acheived by government contracts and utilities in wartime are Taxed 50% or more to pay for the war.
TearForger
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
If they refuse, we can immediately and fairly accuse them of failing to "support America" or "support the troops." It's practically the same people saying we fail to do that just by protesting the war.
Heck, it arguably should be nonprofit. Isn't it undertaken for noble causes, like the defense of our way of life?
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. I thought war profiteering was illegal |
|
But if that's not possible to enforce, I sure like your idea.
|
savemefromdumbya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Would Rangel get off the air? |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't believe it will go anywhere, either |
|
But it sure gives the right wingers something to worry about. The public discussion has begun in earnest because Rangel can get his idea at least heard in committee. I hope it scares the piss out of the fundies and their macho attitude toward nuking everyone who disagrees with them. And makes them realize how Dems are not necessarily weak on terror. I think Rangel is rolling the dice here.
Being 60 gives me the advantage of remembering how the draft helped to end the Vietnam conflict. I now have images of fundy parents leading the charge this time.
|
A Simple Game
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. I don't believe Rangel thinks it will go anywhere either. |
|
It didn't the last time, but he gets on a lot of shows to talk about it doesn't he?
If the number of threads on DU are an indication, people are talking about it, and having second thoughts about starting unnecessary wars. That is Rangel's primary reason.
If you listen to Rangel at all, you know he is a very smart person. He knows what he is doing.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
6. repubs won't vote against it |
|
They don't want it to come up for a vote because they'd have to vote for it. For a repub to vote against it would be sending the message to their heartland constituency -- those midwestern moms and southern dads etc. whose kids volunteer because they think its the "right thing to do" that the costs of war should be borne by them, and not by everyone, that only they should have to sacrifice. .
|
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I'm with you, right up to "IF". |
|
For it to become a rightwing meme, it needn't be a bill.
"Democratic leaders support a draft" is a phrase you'll hear frequently, no matter.
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Recommended - I couldn't agree more. Most people will not appreciate |
|
the politics behind this move.
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. Most people includes most American voters who will think it is stupid. n/t |
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
10. plus, we know that the sons and daughters of privilege |
|
those who make the decisions to go to war to enrich themselves and their friends
won't serve
they'll find every possible deferment, exception or cushy country club "texas air national guard" duty
(except with vanishingly rare exceptions)
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. Yep, it will always work that way. Don't believe t won't. n/t |
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Agreed. I'm amazed at all of the DUers assuming we think this is dumb because we are |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 03:13 PM by MJDuncan1982
stupid and don't understand what he means.
Yes...we know what he means. Just as we knew what Kerry meant with his little joke. But do you understand NOTHING about how politics works?
|
PsN2Wind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-20-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
17. His bringing the subject up puts Iraq on the front page |
|
instead of page A11. Also he thinks, and I agree, that serious consideration of the draft would cause massive demonstrations on the campuses that are only seen now when a school has won a sporting event, lost a sporting event or a new a Xbox is brought out. "Nothing focuses the mind like a hanging"!!!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message |