Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The politics of Rangal's draft idea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:41 PM
Original message
The politics of Rangal's draft idea
First, I fully understand Charley Rangel's draft proposition. He feels that if we have the draft that people will consider more carefully than we have the last 30 years questions of war and peace--if it includes their kids and not somebody else's.

That said, the politics of the idea stinks. If a Democratic proposition to bring back the draft is one of the first things to come out of the new Democratic House and Senate I think it would doom us in 2008. Bush would probably veto it and it would be a big issue in '08--"Dems want to bring back Draft".

My guess is that many democrats know this and it won't get anywhere.

That said I admire Rangel for what he is saying and a part of me agrees with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. This needs to be said over and over again, because some people here
seem to think that either:

a) the average citizen will be smart or aware enough to appreciate the politics behind it

or

b) that any kind of draft, should it actually come to that, would be remotely fair, or that somehow the rich would be compelled to serve if called, because its "the right thing to do"



both positions are incredibly naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Amen. Very, very naive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Options Remain Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. actually the best way is to install a War Tax
That requires all Profits acheived by government contracts and utilities in wartime are Taxed 50% or more to pay for the war.

TearForger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. This is brilliant
If they refuse, we can immediately and fairly accuse them of failing to "support America" or "support the troops." It's practically the same people saying we fail to do that just by protesting the war.

Heck, it arguably should be nonprofit. Isn't it undertaken for noble causes, like the defense of our way of life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I thought war profiteering was illegal
But if that's not possible to enforce, I sure like your idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Would Rangel get off the air?
this is suicidal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't believe it will go anywhere, either
But it sure gives the right wingers something to worry about. The public discussion has begun in earnest because Rangel can get his idea at least heard in committee. I hope it scares the piss out of the fundies and their macho attitude toward nuking everyone who disagrees with them. And makes them realize how Dems are not necessarily weak on terror. I think Rangel is rolling the dice here.

Being 60 gives me the advantage of remembering how the draft helped to end the Vietnam conflict. I now have images of fundy parents leading the charge this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I don't believe Rangel thinks it will go anywhere either.
It didn't the last time, but he gets on a lot of shows to talk about it doesn't he?

If the number of threads on DU are an indication, people are talking about it, and having second thoughts about starting unnecessary wars. That is Rangel's primary reason.

If you listen to Rangel at all, you know he is a very smart person. He knows what he is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I agree with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. repubs won't vote against it
They don't want it to come up for a vote because they'd have to vote for it. For a repub to vote against it would be sending the message to their heartland constituency -- those midwestern moms and southern dads etc. whose kids volunteer because they think its the "right thing to do" that the costs of war should be borne by them, and not by everyone, that only they should have to sacrifice. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm with you, right up to "IF".
For it to become a rightwing meme, it needn't be a bill.

"Democratic leaders support a draft" is a phrase you'll hear frequently, no matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Recommended - I couldn't agree more. Most people will not appreciate
the politics behind this move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Most people includes most American voters who will think it is stupid. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. plus, we know that the sons and daughters of privilege
those who make the decisions to go to war to enrich themselves and their friends

won't serve

they'll find every possible deferment, exception or cushy country club "texas air national guard" duty

(except with vanishingly rare exceptions)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yep, it will always work that way. Don't believe t won't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Agreed. I'm amazed at all of the DUers assuming we think this is dumb because we are
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 03:13 PM by MJDuncan1982
stupid and don't understand what he means.

Yes...we know what he means. Just as we knew what Kerry meant with his little joke. But do you understand NOTHING about how politics works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. His bringing the subject up puts Iraq on the front page
instead of page A11.
Also he thinks, and I agree, that serious consideration of the draft would cause massive demonstrations on the campuses that are only seen now when a school has won a sporting event, lost a sporting event or a new a Xbox is brought out.
"Nothing focuses the mind like a hanging"!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC