Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Times Bravely Declares VICTORY in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:08 PM
Original message
Washington Times Bravely Declares VICTORY in Iraq
from Wonkette. Never underestimate how stupid wingnut newspapers can get!

http://www.wonkette.com/politics/washington-times/washington-times-bravely-declares-victory-in-iraq-216095.php

Washington Times Bravely Declares Victory In Iraq

It takes courage in the face of adversity — along with “Yikes, We’re All Crazy Moonies! — to declare victory in Iraq a few hours after Henry Freakin’ Kissinger says he “doesn’t believe that is possible.” But that’s why we love the Washington Times.

The Times describes the corrupt and doomed Iraq reconstruction nightmare as “a minor miracle” and quotes a minor Bush appointee at the Pentagon as saying “something equivalent to the Marshall Plan has been accomplished in Iraq.”

So, stealing $20 billion and fixing up a few schools and hospitals you bombed in the first place is now equal to transforming half a continent of starving people and smoking ruins into Western Europe. Next week, the Washington Times will finally declare an American victory in Vietnam, too. Didn’t Bush just give a victory speech in Hanoi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMG...They have simply lost it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ok fine. We won. Whatever. Let's get those troops home NOW. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftisalwaysright Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. They're Crazy!
It's good they say things like that; that way NO ONE can possibly take them seriously. Unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, I'd venture a guess that their readers take them seriously.
Or should I say "seriesly"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. See how easy that was. Just declare victory.
WE WON HOORAY FOR THE USA

Now it's time to get the fuck out!!

Maybe the NYT and WP should do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. It all depends on whose yardstick you are using!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. They gotta shut that POS down
It makes Fux look rational and unbiased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. What frightens me are how few ads there are in the Washington Times.
It's like the RW version of AAR -- they can't pay people to advertise in its pages. Obviously run at a loss. Skews your ability to take them seriously since they have absolutely no incentive to "write for their audience". Even the neocons have abandoned them for the Washington Enquirer (really the Loudoun Enquirer, for rich folks who complained that the Times had too much "urban" reporting.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Notice that Bush didn't have to fly into Hanoi under cover of darkness n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC