Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Isikoff - Chinese Water Torture-What Did The President Know & When Did He Know It?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 06:29 PM
Original message
Michael Isikoff - Chinese Water Torture-What Did The President Know & When Did He Know It?
Michael Isikoff, Chinese Water Torture, Washington-style:

What was President Bush's personal role, if any, in giving a green light to harsh interrogation methods? That's never been clear, but now Democratic leaders are more determined than ever to find out. The CIA acknowledged last week, in response to a freedom of information lawsuit by the ACLU, that Bush signed a 2002 directive authorizing the creation of secret prisons overseas to hold and interrogate high-level Qaeda operatives. Key Democrats, infuriated that they had to learn about the document from a lawsuit, say they intend to demand a copy to determine precisely what it said.

"This will allow us to pull back the curtain on what the president knew and when he knew it," said one Democratic aide, who asked not to be identified talking about sensitive matters. Sen. Patrick Leahy, the incoming chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, on Friday fired off a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, seeking a copy of the 2002 directive.

Leahy and other Dems also want to see a still secret Justice Department memo approving the use of particular interrogation techniques; critics have long suspected the document includes references to waterboarding and other methods that may constitute torture. (Former deputy White House counsel Timothy Flanigan last year confirmed in Senate testimony that he and Gonzales, then the White House counsel, were briefed about particular interrogation methods by Justice lawyers, but declined to say what they were.) Leahy has sought to subpoena the Justice memo in the past--a good indicator that he may well do so again when the Dems take control of the Senate in January. ...

more at:
http://www.talk.newsweek.com/politics/default.asp?item=290044
via:
http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/005219.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC