Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am not a political scientist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 08:20 PM
Original message
I am not a political scientist
I am new to political activism.

But it seems to me that since this is still a 'lame duck' congress..we all need to take a step back and watch what is happening. The pendulum is swinging as we knew it would.. let it swing. Let the Rethugs handle the momentum. This is -their- war, this is -their- mess and accountability has come.

The Congress-elect has been given a big stick..let them use it to stir the pot. Rangel's statement about the draft has certainly brought up some stuff, hasn't it? A lot of what is going on right now, including his statement about the draft, has opened the doors to discussion and debate about war on other levels besides fear, and may well be a catalyst for questions which should have been asked about 9/11.

I think Rangel knows that a draft resolution will never pass in Congress, but, by bringing this up now, he is shining a light on the the imbalances in our military and on the unequal distribution of the responsibility of war. Because of Rangel's statement there is more dialogue about the lies that got us into Iraq and a growing awareness of the criminal ease with which the Bush administration sent our sons and daughters (not theirs) to Iraq to be maimed and to die.

I agree with Randi Rhodes... Rangel wants to stop the ease with which this government CHOOSES to go to war. Iraq is a war of CHOICE and it was Bush's choice .

People will pay more attention when their own asses might be on the line or when their own children might be put in harms way. I think Rangel is right. Had there been a draft five years ago we wouldn't be in Iraq now.

Watch the reactions.

Have faith.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. one might just as easily argue that had there been a draft...
...five years ago we would be in Iran as well as Iraq by now. The Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld doctrine is one of unilateral "force projection" wherever the U.S. wants to project its interests. It is unlikely that anything would have stood in the way of that in 2002. Congress stumbled over itself to bend over for the administration, and they were mostly convinced that the war against Iraq would be quick and neat. If cannon fodder was cheap and easy to obtain, the administration would just as likely have advanced its hegemonistic agenda on multiple fronts, and today we'd find ourselves with many more dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, that's my take on it too...
We should be damned glad there wasn't a draft.

And we sure as shit shouldn't be considering instituting one.

I don't think these people would hestitate to perform ANY atrocity to advance their agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed we don't want to help them advance their bullshit
Edited on Mon Nov-20-06 09:39 PM by MadMaddie
Neocon agenda...

What I fail to see in most the conversations on DU is the following...

...Is the proposal to continue to send our existing military men and women back for 4th, 5th, 6th etc tours of duty?

The ultimate answer is to get the hell out of Iraq

I see a few options, I know many of you have other ideas...

1. * finally sees the light and pulls our troops completely out. Probability...Not going to happen unless we can impeach him and his cabal

2. Continue redeploying our regular and reserve troops over and over until they get killed, have mental breakdowns or until they can't fight anymore...Probability...Very High

3 Draft...Not something I want to see ever ...but how do you stop resending our currrent troops over and over again....

Just askin...

Americans do not want a draft and they don't want this war...something has to give...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. First and foremost
we shouldn't be there in the first place.

Second. NO politician should be put in the position where he can break our military with impugnity.

Third. The National Guard is NOT for foreign adventuring.

Fourth. The back-door draft is bullshit.

Fifth. We need out NOW. No debates, no hedging, no "but it'll degenerate into chaos." It already IS.

The American people want us to leave. They want our soldiers home. Our politicians better well figure out a way to do it. If it takes impeaching Bush, so be it.

You know, I don't mind this debate. I think it's brought up some great issues. But I CANNOT and will not support the base proposition. I think it's just plain wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You are right we shouldn't be there and we shouldn't have to have
this conversation..

Our biggest concern should be getting our soldiers out while they still have sanity left and still have their bodies intact....

Other then getting them out there are no good solutions....

And we should be talking about impeachment for this illegal war....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I was shocked to find myself agreeing with
Ed chultz a few weeks back. I rarely do.

He said impeachment should be "off the agenda" but "not off the table."

Meaning we can't march in and say "Hey, we're going to impeach this bozo" but, rather, "we're going to gather evidence and start pushing for things the American people want. If you don't let us give the people what they've asked for, THEN we're going to impeach your ass. And they're going to cheer us while we do it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's the only way to do it...
Because I think all of the investigations will lead ultimately to Rove, Cheney, *, Condi and Rumsfeld, Bremmer and the rest of the cabal....and when the evidence is so overwhelming there will be no choice but to impeach.....The American people will demand it...

I also believe in order for the US to try to repair damaged relations around the world we will have to agree to let the Hague prosecute these criminals for "Crimes against Humanity"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think so too...
I think we can lever complicit members of Congress into going along with progressive plans and basically rat out the rat-bastards for some sort of immunity.

I think we need to be pragmatic. If we do it right, we'll get most of them. I think doing it the wrong way will net us a convenient scapegoat. Probably Bush. As soon as he's out of office, he's useless to them.

If we want to take down the cabal, it's going to take smarts, not just ambition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Agreed.....
Well...getting ready to go watch.. Hero's Save the cheerleader, Save the World!!

Have a good evening!!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh, yeah.
Watch that show religiously myself.

Half an hour and counting. Of course, I gotta wait until my wife gets home, works out, eats dinner, and THEN we can watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. People aren't used their representatives representing effectively...
...let these people work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC