Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military Data Reveal Tips on Antiwar Activities

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:31 AM
Original message
Military Data Reveal Tips on Antiwar Activities
Big Brother is watching, even though they claim they misinterpreted their 'mandate'. :eyes:

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=8428

November 21st, 2006 12:49 am
Military Data Reveal Tips on Antiwar Activities

By Eric Lichtblau and Mark Mazzetti / New York Times

WASHINGTON, Nov. 20 — An antiterrorist database used by the Defense Department in an effort to prevent attacks against military installations included intelligence tips about antiwar planning meetings held at churches, libraries, college campuses and other locations, newly disclosed documents show.

snip//

Ben Wizner, a lawyer for the A.C.L.U. in New York, said the new documents suggested that the military’s efforts to glean intelligence on protesters went beyond what was previously known. If intelligence officials “are going to be doing investigations or monitoring in a place where people gather to worship or to study, they should have a pretty clear indication that a crime has occurred,” Mr. Wizner added.

The leader of one antiwar group mentioned repeatedly in the latest military documents provided to the A.C.L.U. said he was skeptical that the military had ended its collection of material on war protests.

“I don’t believe it,” said the leader, Michael T. McPhearson, a former Army captain who is the executive director of Veterans for Peace, a group in St. Louis.

Mr. McPhearson said he found the references to his group in the Talon database disappointing but not altogether surprising, and he said the group continued to use public settings and the Internet to plan its protests.



more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are afraid of Vets for Peace!
And Cindy Sheehan
and the vegans...
and the Quakers...
and anyone who brings attention
to the military industrial complex.

They will be the ones to pull the trigger first!
Be ready with your video cameras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Seems they're afraid of anyone not toeing their ideological line.
And I hope you mean 'pull the trigger' figuratively, though nothing would surprise me, which is why this is frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Veterans for Peace got access to the "Talon" database: how do I?
The latest Talon documents showed that the military used a variety of sources to collect intelligence leads on antiwar protests, including an agent in the Department of Homeland Security, Google searches on the Internet and e-mail messages forwarded by apparent informants with ties to protest groups.

In most cases, entries in the Talon database acknowledged that there was no specific evidence indicating the possibility of terrorism or disruptions at the antiwar events, but they warned of the potential for violence.

One entry on Mr. McPhearson’s group from April 2005, for instance, described a protest at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces at which members handed out antimilitary literature and set up hundreds of white crosses to symbolize soldiers killed in Iraq.

“Veterans for Peace is a peaceful organization,” the entry said, but added there was potential that future protests “could become violent.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. File an FOIA? Contact the ACLU??
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I have got skin in this one
thanks for the answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You might even go to Vets For Peace and get their
input. If you don't get an answer, I have a friend who is friends with Cindy Sheehan. She might be able to give you some feedback. Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thus the reasons for the vague definition of "enemy combatant" in the torture bill...
Let there be no doubt about who much of this terror bill fervor is directed at. See you in Gitmo, my DU brothers and sisters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Or perhaps one of those cozy little camps they're building,
familiarly termed detention centers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC