Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US TORTURE POLICY: Grossly Mistreating A Detainee Now Justifies Keeping Him Quiet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 11:01 AM
Original message
US TORTURE POLICY: Grossly Mistreating A Detainee Now Justifies Keeping Him Quiet
Top-Secret Torture
The Bush administration claims detainees can't disclose how they were treated.
Tuesday, November 21, 2006; Page A26


BURIED WITHIN a recent government brief in the case of Guantanamo Bay inmate Majid Khan is one of the more disturbing arguments the Bush administration has advanced in the legal struggles surrounding the war on terrorism. Mr. Khan was one of the al-Qaeda suspects who was detained in a secret prison of the CIA and subjected to “alternative” interrogation tactics — the administration’s chilling phrase for methods most people regard as torture. Now the government is arguing that by subjecting detainees to such treatment, the CIA gives them “top secret” classified information — and the government can then take extraordinary measures to keep them quiet about it. If this argument carries the day, it will make virtually impossible any accountability for the administration’s treatment of top al-Qaeda detainees. And it will also ensure that key parts of any military trials get litigated in secrecy.

But this is the money quote:

The trouble is that at least some of the secrets the government is trying to protect are the very techniques used against people such as Mr. Khan -- and its means of protecting them is to muzzle him about what the CIA did to him. CIA official Marilyn A. Dorn said in an affidavit that Mr. Khan might reveal "the conditions of detention and specific alternative interrogation procedures." In other words, grossly mistreating a detainee now justifies keeping him quiet.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/20/AR2006112001134.html?referrer=email

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. See, if you know we tortured this guy
You might not believe this blood-stained confession he signed. So we can't let him testify as to the beatings, the abuse, the stress positions, the sleep deprivation, the waterboardings, and so on and so forth. It all makes perfect sense if you're a heartless criminal cabal. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kafka could not have dreamed up this bureaucratic bullshit.
Yet, our society will have a serious debate about this. We've all gone insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grizmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I've been meaning to reread The Trial
to help me remember when this stuff was just make believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. the crime and the ongoing coverup in black and white.
both criminal enterprises breaking the laws of both the us and in treaty obligations to the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC