Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'd like to see some legislation that addresses "presidential papers"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 04:32 PM
Original message
I'd like to see some legislation that addresses "presidential papers"
If we are to have nepotism-run-amok in our government for the foreseeable future, we need to have some cut-and-dried LAWS regarding presidential papers.

As you all recall, Reagan & Bush1 administrations were due to have their papers released, and would have been if Gore had been allowed to claim his victory.

When that did not happen, Junior practically ran to the Oval office so he could "hold" those papers, and immediately secured BOTH in Texas..

Republilcan control in both houses guaranteed that they would not stand in his way. But there is a new sheriff in town :evilgrin:

BC has said that he's ok with HIS papers being released early if they want to, but of course if Hillary ends up in the Oval office, it might be to HER advantage to hold those as well..

Can congress revisit this and ensure that those papers are released as they have been before?

I think 6 years is a decent interval after one leaves office..


The public has a right to know. and it's not a bad idea to release them while the people who held those offices are still alive and kicking, so they could be "asked" about why they did what they did..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good point--
and I'm hoping that the youtube legacy is preserved, as well. There are some dynamite tapes regarding the Chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SutaUvaca Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was one of chumpster's earliest executive orders.
(stopping the release of poppy's papers and then his own)
It should have been a warning siren to Americans, that the BFEE had lots of stuff it wanted to keep hidden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's No Such Thing As "Presidential Papers", They're All "Public Documents"
We the people paid the President's salary (no matter which one we're talking about), bought the paper, paid for the ink, and cover the rent on the vault their stored in. How in hell are they anything other than the people's papers, and therefore public documents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's exactly why WE need to CLAIM them
NO president should have the "option" to set his papers, or those of a previous president, aside..

Personally, I think we should have IMMEDIATE access to them.

Especially since we are in a "perpetual-war-forever", fresh eyes should always be able to scan for omissions and explanations.

They should not have the "option" to give us dribs & drabs in multi-million dollar book deals..especially when they never show us their warts in those books.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC