Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich: Cut Off Iraq War Funding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 11:18 AM
Original message
Kucinich: Cut Off Iraq War Funding
Edited on Thu Nov-23-06 11:26 AM by goodhue


Rep. Dennis Kucinich: Cut Off Iraq War Funding

By Joshua Scheer

In an interview with Truthdig contributor Joshua Scheer,* Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) reacts to Rep. John Murtha’s failed bid for House majority leader, and explains why cutting off funding for the Iraq war is the only way to truly protect American troops.

Edited Transcript:

http://www.truthdig.com/interview/item/20061116_kucinich_cut_off_funding/

* * *

TRUTHDIG: I was just reading up on your appearance on Democracy Now!, in which you talked about cutting off the funds to Iraq as being the only way to make any progress there. Do you want to comment on that?

KUCINICH: Today, it was announced that 2,000 more Marines are being sent to Anbar province—a place which was already declared “lost” for the purposes of military occupation. Why are we sacrificing our young men and women? Why are we keeping them in an impossible situation? Why are we stoking a civil war with our continued presence? We have to take a new direction in Iraq, and that direction is out.

Now, there are many plans out there. The people talking about phased redeployment, the president as the commander in chief ultimately has the authority to determine the placement of troops. Congress’ real authority, and Congress’ constitutional as a co-equal branch of government, requires that it be heard from, and I believe that Congress must exercise its authority to protect the troops by bringing them home. And the only way we can do that effectively is to vote against supplemental appropriations—which has kept the war going, or to vote against appropriation bills which fund the war. That’s Congress’ ultimate power—the power of the purse.

If we truly care about our troops, we’ll get them out. It’s the phoniest argument to say that a cut-off of funds will leave troops stranded in the field. There’s always money in the pipeline to pay for an orderly withdrawal. But those who favor continuing the war or escalating the war are using the troops as a tool to further policies that are against the interests of the troops, against the interests of American people, and against the interests of peace in the world.

* * *

http://www.truthdig.com/interview/item/20061116_kucinich_cut_off_funding/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bravo for Dennis. But peace is "unpatriotic".
And, far too politically risky for most politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. peace as too politically risky
I think the tide is turning in that respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They value their careers over their country. Over our soldiers.
You know what? I don't like "troops." It's crappy English and, I suspect, an attempt to sanitize the reality of war. Our soldiers are being killed. Our military personnel are being killed.

I'm not using "troops" anymore. It sounds like the circus is in town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R. Kucinich is right - there is more than enough $$ in the pipeline
to get the troops out. Much equipment and bases will be lost, military shattered -- that's what Bush has doomed us to.

OUT. NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R-- this is absolutely right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cutting off the funding is what brought the Vietnam war to a close.
But who knows what Bush would do. He might choose to leave our troops high and dry and point the finger at the Democrats. It would take political courage for the Democrats to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Political courage is what we must *demand* of the Democrats! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fighting fire with fire.
Or rather money.

It's the only way this war will end. There are far too few like Kucinich. There isn't going to be a pretty way of dealing with this mess. I'm with this idea all the way. Put a red hot poker in the eye of the corporations. Go Dennis, go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, yes, yes
That's how its done.

Any organized attempt to do this will be preceded by galvanizing events to preclude American withdrawal of forces from the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's atrocious that Kucinich doesn't get more support ...
Edited on Thu Nov-23-06 03:03 PM by TahitiNut
... for being just about the best and most consistent spokesperson for true, uncompromising, mainstream liberal principles. Especially on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. " Just say NO", Kucinich really should be running for president!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC