Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

4-choice Poll. Nancy Grace...Innocent, Guilty, Innocent Scumbag, Guilty Scumbag.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 06:43 PM
Original message
Poll question: 4-choice Poll. Nancy Grace...Innocent, Guilty, Innocent Scumbag, Guilty Scumbag.
Nancy Grace Sued By Estate Of Melinda Duckett For Wrongful Death



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/2006/11/21/nancy-grace-sued-by-estat_e_34615.html

Nancy Grace and CNN were sued today by the estate and family of Melinda Duckett, the mother of missing toddler Trenton Duckett who committed suicide after being aggressively questioned by Grace on her Headline News show. The family's complaint alleges that "intentional infliction of emotional distress" and misrepresentation, alleging that Grace enticed Duckett on to the show as a means of helping to find the boy and drawing attention to the case, and then "harassing and intimidating an anguished and severely mentally distressed mother" under completely false pretenses. The complaint also alleges that Grace and her co-workers misrepresented their purpose to Duckett's attorney. the complaint also alleges intentional infliction of emotional distress on Duckett's family in the airing of the tape after Duckett's death without the consent of the family or estate, "in order to improve their ratings and for the prospective monetary gain of Defendant NANCY GRACE and Defendant CNN in malicious and contumacious disregard to inflicting severe emotional distress and damage" on the Plaintiffs.

The complaint was filed by Duckett's parents, William and Beth Eubank, and also names Duckett's estranged husband Joshua Duckett, who has made numerous appearances on Grace's show, as a defendant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder why this lady deserves money but not the blacks who were also verbally assualted
by this Michael Richards?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The question here is...
Edited on Thu Nov-23-06 07:03 PM by rpannier
whether nancy grace is culpable in the suicide of a woman.
ms grace mislead a distraught woman onto her show with the understanding that ms grace was going to try and aid in finding this woman's missing son.
Then ms grace proceeded to barrage this woman with questions that implied the mother was responsible for the disappearance of her son and ms grace wanted a confession (which would improve her ratings).

Is ms grace culpable...yes. Because she mislead an unstable woman onto her show and then blindsided her.

The people mr richards insulted were paying customers. He did not invite them in with the intent of hurling racial insults at them.

In my opinion, the two situations are not analogous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "...she mislead an unstable woman onto her show and then blindsided her..."
Absolutely correct, and comparing the situation to the Michael Richards debacle...or anything else, for that matter...is mixing apples & oranges.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't just burn her, though, burn the producers and CNN, too. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. CNN accepts ultimate responsibility for the shows they air.
I haven't looked at Grace's show to see if they run a standard "The opinions expressed are not necessarily the opinions of CNN, etc etc etc..."

...but...if Grace comes out on the losing end of this, I can't imagine CNN simply walking away without a scratch.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's a scumbag but she didn't kill the woman.
It's bullshit to sue her over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. There's an underlying question...
...Nancy Grace exhibits what I would classify as "predictable behavior."

SO...the question is "Did the deceased woman know who she was dealing with?"

And the legal battle centers around:

1). If she DID, and dealt with her ANYWAY, she accepted the consequences

2). If she DIDN'T, and Grace's actions constitute an act of deception toward an unstable woman, what is the degree of Grace's liability?

Granted, that's an over-simplification, but I'm also not a judge.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. You must remember that no one is accusing her of murder
That would be a criminal matter.
The legal question is whether the Wicked Witch of the West through negligence caused harm to the family of that woman.
And I am comfortable with not making a judgment on that and leave it to a jury to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. They're suing over intentional infliction of emotional distress
Not murder. It's clear that the family has a good case. They deserve their day in court and Nancy Disgrace at long last must take responsibility for her own actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Y'all Need to Take Another Look
at the First Amendment.

She's a scumbag, but she didn't make that woman kill herself, and it's JUST POSSIBLE the woman was guilty as hell, and killed herself because of that.

Even RW journalists are JOURNALISTS, for God's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's why there are four choices...
...because the First Amendment protects men and women who are scumbags, as well as those who are not.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Amen
But I had difficulty characterizing Nancy as "innocent". I don't think she's guilty, but "innocent" is a s - t - r - e - t - c - h.

She vibes KNOWING. I have no personal experience, but isn't that part of the appeal of whores?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, she didn't kill the woman, but...
...I truly feel that she took unfair advantage of a very unstable woman.

I have no idea what that means in "legal" terms.

But it's like the story of the frog and the scorpion.

The frog is preparing to swim across the stream when the scorpion, sitting on the banks, asks if he can ride on the frog's back.

"If I let you do that, you'll sting me, and I'll die," replied the frog.

"Don't be foolish," replied the scorpion. "If I sting you, we'll both drown. I will simply be in your debt for your act of kindness."

The frog agreed. As he reached the edge of the river bank, he felt a sharp, burning sensation in the middle of his back. As he lay dying on the shore, he looked up at the scorpion and said "You...PROMISED..."

To which the scorpion replied "Hey, I'm a scorpion...I STING things."

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Even right wing journalists are journalists --
but NG is no journalist. She is a scandal-mongering whore who is only slightly less repulsive than Glen Beck. It is for the courts to decide who is and isn't guilty, not her. I can only hope this will end her career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. She's ABSOLUTELY cut from the same cloth as Glenn Beck.
Edited on Thu Nov-23-06 07:50 PM by Human Torch
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. The woman was clearly distraught
Edited on Thu Nov-23-06 07:55 PM by seasonedblue
and it's my opinion, along with others here, that she was deliberately misled about the purpose of her "interview" with Grace.

I did see a clip of the show & Nancy Grace verbally brutalized the woman...I vote guilty scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
restante Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ms. Grace uses language
as a weapon. One wonders how a fellow human can be trained to be this ugly. This program, along with so many others, does nothing to help, improve, assist or entertain viewers. If you enjoy this type of TV viewing, you would probably pull the wings from flies. She is guilty of verbal trashing of anyone who ventures near her cameras. Why do viewers like this program? And why do indivduals of any stripe participate in television exposure of their personal affairs? She could not do it if the appearances did not take place. I wonder if they are paid. She is probably not guilty of any criminal act. Only being a disgusting human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC