Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sheriff REFUSES to enforce town's "unconstitutional" foreign flag ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:08 PM
Original message
Sheriff REFUSES to enforce town's "unconstitutional" foreign flag ban
Edited on Thu Nov-23-06 10:19 PM by Bluebear
"If you start victimizing a segment of our population, we will be there to arrest you. If anyone commits a crime because of someone else's ethnic background, they can face being arrested for hate crimes. We have a zero tolerance for that type of attitude." - Sheriff DeMeo



PAHRUMP -- In a small act of civil disobedience, Pahrump residents Bob and Liese Tamburrino on Saturday raised an Italian flag and a Polish flag over their garage.

In a not-so-civil act, a vandal or vandals, in the middle of the night less than 24 hours later, egged their Italian flag. "They probably thought it was a Mexican flag," Bob Tamburrino said of the Italian flag, which was chosen as a tribute to his ancestry.

The Pahrump Town Board on Nov. 14 adopted an ordinance that bans the flying of foreign flags by themselves. The board also declared English the town's official language and denied unspecified, and apparently nonexistent, town benefits to undocumented immigrants.

The Tamburrinos, who are incensed at the ordinance they say is unconstitutional and smacks of racism, called police after the egging even though they could have been ticketed for violating the new ordinance. But officers did not cite the couple, and Nye County Sheriff Tony DeMeo said Wednesday that he has no plans to ever enforce the ordinance. DeMeo also called it unconstitutional.

"The sheriff is a constitutional office," he said. "My job is to make sure when we enforce something there's a constitutionality behind it." The ordinance also is divisive, DeMeo said. "I don't think passing an ordinance like this is healthy to the community. It's driving a wedge between certain segments of the population." :applause:

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Nov-23-Thu-2006/news/11008521.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kudos for some simple, common sense, Sheriff DeMeo. And for speaking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. The fact they egged the Italian flag, which is similar to Mexico's...
Edited on Thu Nov-23-06 10:19 PM by Minnesota_Lib
..and not the Polish flag pretty much confirms that the right's new "anti-immigration" movement is less about homeland security than it is old fashion bigotry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The town went about it artlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. How could this have been done "artfully"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. more speech
The ACLU position states that the recourse for offensive speech is more speech, speech stating your position or criticism of that speech. Law should not prohibit expression of either the offender or the offended.

If the government of Pahrump was concerned by the expression of Mexican flags, then as a constitutional government it would have been within its rights to fly American flags in any number from government buildings, paint those buildings and even the sidewalks red, white, and blue. It could uniform the city workers in the national colors. It could hang bunting from the light posts. It could arrest anyone it caught defacing these expressions. It could market itself as America's most patriotic city.

What it can't do is tell a property owner or leaseholder (with landlord permission) that he can't fly flag, whether he is doing so in ethnic pride or he is doing so for the purpose of cultural aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. There's no bigotry involved
If it were an attack on non-white people, then blacks, Asians, etc., would also be targeted.

These laws are simply an attempt to enforce the border laws where our federal government has failed.

Secure the borders, and no town would even THINK of passing such laws.

Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "Simple as that"
Izzat so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. A more effective approach would be to crack down on the
Edited on Fri Nov-24-06 11:14 AM by tblue37
employers who hire undocumented workers at far below a reasonable wage because all they really care about is cheap labor, especially if the workers can't go to the authorities to report abuses.

The border is porous because the rich and powerful want it to be porous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. So tossing an egg at a flag that looks like a Mexican flag is enforcing our borders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. yes, its that simple.
how? i don't know. but it apparently is;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flying_monkeys Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. So until we "secure the borders", it is understandable that people will menace others?
And Eye-talians and others who use similar colors for their Nation's flags should just google "Best Way To Get Egg Out Of Flag"?


Whether one thinks illegal immigrants are a problem or not, one should HEED the laws respecting private property whether suspected illegal or not.



Ironic that some are braying, "They broke the LAW by COMING HERE!" while countenancing egging personal property - - since THAT is also against the LAW....



Could we get some consistency here? Either ALL LAWS are equally BAD, or cut some slack for people who hopped a river without papers, Jack....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I Believe Other Ethnic Groups Have Been the Object of Prejudice
even when there has been no question of their legal status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. A silly ordinance like this does nothing to solve illegal immigration
A better solution would be to have better border security and to penalize employers who are exploiting the problem! This type of ordinance is a violation of free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Pull the other one- it's got bells on. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kickin_Donkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. That is a ridiculous statement. Your logic is nonexistent ...
Because there were no attacks on blacks or Asians, there was no bigotry involved? Hello ... maybe it was bigotry against Hispanics.

Just because blacks or Asians weren't targeted doesn't mean it was NOT bigotry against Hispanics. Asians make up only 0.85% of the population of Pahrump; blacks make up only 1.3% of the population, so the lack of attacks against them is irrelevant because they make up a negligible percentage of the population. And how do you know THEY have never been attacked? You can't get that from reading one newspaper article.

The intellectual contortions some people go through to deny racism ... or their own racism ... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Nooooo. "These laws" are an UNCONSTITUTIONAL violation of the first amendment.
They say, in effect, "your statement pisses us off so much, we're gonna arrest you".


Simple as THAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. self-delete
Edited on Fri Nov-24-06 06:52 AM by SalmonChantedEvening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. How does not flying a flag secure your border?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
71. That would sure be a lot less expensive than a 700 mile fence
Let's get those flags up along the border!

LOL :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
32. I don't see your logic. Banning flags doesn't secure borders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
58. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever read...
If it were an attack on non-white people, then blacks, Asians, etc., would also be targeted.

Attacks made out of bigotry are those that are aimed at specific ethnic/religious/cultural groups. There is no definition that says 'all non-whites must be attacked for it to be bigotry'...


These laws are simply an attempt to enforce the border laws where our federal government has failed.

How on earth does banning the flying of foreign flags attempt to enforce border laws??? How would me flying an Australian flag if I lived there be endangering border laws?


Secure the borders, and no town would even THINK of passing such laws.

Educate Americans as to what bigotry is and try to dispel some of that ugly xenophobia so rampant in parts of the US and no town in the US would come up with such bigoted and moronic laws...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. There is obviously more to it.
While you will find all sorts of flags of other nations flown in the US by American citizens and aliens in ethnic pride, to my knowledge the Mexican flag is the only flag which can also be said to represent a secession movement. My neighbors (legal aliens) have a Russian flag hanging from their house, but it doesn't represent their desire to "reclaim" Florida for Russia. Many people (citizens or legal/illegal alien) who fly the Mexican flag do so as a statement of one of a variety of beliefs which involve the overthrow of the government of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. How about the Confederate flag?
Do you regard flying that as a desire to secede?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. re
Do you regard flying that as a desire to secede?

I think people fly the Confederate flag for a variety of reasons.

in no particular order:

• The South shall rise again (secession)
• Regional identity
• To piss off people who don't like the rebel flag
• Overt racism
• peer pressure/rural male identity
• varying combinations and degrees of the above

The difference between the Confederate flag and the Mexican flag is that the Confederate flag is flown only by native American citizens as a rule, and not identified with a foreign government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news but
while the Confederacy existed, it WAS a foreign government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. piffle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Non response. The Confederacy declared itself a foreign government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. completely different
There is a huge difference between the commonwealths of the south withdrawing from their voluntary confederation with those of the north, to be a separate confederation in and of itself, and a design for a region of the United States to be placed behind the Mexican border which was settled by war, treaty and purchase over 150 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #53
65. There is no such genuine "design"
anymore than a bunch of drunk rednecks shouting "the South will rise again!" is a real plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Enlighten us about the logical link between the Mexican flag and the overthrow of the government
Edited on Fri Nov-24-06 05:19 PM by Commie Pinko Dirtbag
of the USA.

Edit: there was a "how" too much in the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. This kind of ridiculous diatribe needs no logical link. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I want to watch him fumble while trying to provide one. You know, "give 'em rope."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. I should have said "ownership" of the United States
........ of the territory some folks would like to believe is "in dispute".

I didn't mean to say or imply that they had designs on Washington DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. Why would Russian Americans want Florida, Alaska is where its at...
Also, flying the Mexican flag indicates secession? What type of convoluted logic is that? First, there is a small minority of wackos who think Mexico should take back territory it lost, there are a few others who think a new nation should form from territory between the U.S. and Mexico. As far as I'm aware of, flying the Mexican flag is no signal for either movements. In fact, I'm sure there are some Russian Americans in Alaska that do the same with the Russian flag, wackos too, to be honest. Puerto Ricans are another example, some hoist up the Puerto Rican flag in support of secession from the United States, again a small minority of people in all these groups. Hawaiians, same thing. For California, also, same thing. Republic of Texas as well, how many more examples do you need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. I didn't say "Russian Americans" I said: Russians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. And that makes a difference, why?
We have homegrown and foreign secessionists movements all over the place, its nothing new, and is almost always just a small minority of people that support such movements. Why people get paranoid about one particular subset of nutcases is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Because it isn't what I said.
The Russian neighbors are here legally.

We have homegrown and foreign secessionists movements all over the place, its nothing new, and is almost always just a small minority of people that support such movements. Why people get paranoid about one particular subset of nutcases is beyond me.

Because there is a difference between citizen secessionists and foriegn invaders. There is a difference between legal aliens and illegal aliens. The Mexican movement is not something to dismiss as a subset fo whackos, when there are million of illegal aliens in this country and reserves on the other side fo the border. It is not something to dismiss, when Mexico itself is experiencing military scale insurgency.

http://aztlan.net/mexican_insurgents_warn_bombings.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. So now illegal immigrants equals a foriegn invasion?
How you could equate impoverished people who came here, with something more like an invading army is mind-boggling.

Uhm, do you take any medication by any chance? Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. Yeah, everyone you disagree with is on drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. Actually, I was hoping that...
You were taking something so you can properly deal with reality, instead of this paranoid delusion you seem to live in at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. It is PRECISELY something to dismiss as a "subset of whackos"
and anyone who posts such links to such a non-credible site also belongs in that subset.

I was trying to take you seriously, but not anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. I talk to many Mexican nationals
who have the mindset that USA somehow belongs to Mexico. the mentality is there. They are obviously getting fed this information from the corrupt Mexican government. just saying :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. And the English still call us Colonials, your point? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
59. yep - that pretty much sums it up
Bigotry will exist, even when it must be "under the radar"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vorta Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. It will be interesting to see how/if the Republicans comment on this.
They were all over Gavin Newsome, saying it wasn't his place to decide if a law was constitutional. The court agreed that it was not the place of a mayor to decide if a law is constitutional. Demeo appears to be a Democrat (his opponent got contributions from Nye County GOP), so I am wondering if the GOP will criticize him for this, or stay away from it so they don't look "anti-hispanic".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. My impression is DeMeo could give a rat's behind if he's criticized
His faith in the Constitution is whole, it is complete, it is total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And it stands on its own, outside the spin. We need more of this, not more spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. Now, come on, give us your OWN opinion.
(Even though it's pretty apparent by now)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-23-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hell yeah, DeMeo. That's the way to do it.
Fuck the racists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. More power to Bob and Liese Tamburrino
And even more power to Nye County Sheriff Tony DeMeo (isn't that one of them foreign names?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Day bush started shock and awe, I was so upset.
We did not know what to do. We flew the French flag alone, in protest. San Diego County, Calif.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. Good for them. There is still a First Amendment - despite the efforts of
authoritarian fucks to destroy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
17. Here's the crux of the illegal immigration issue
From the article:
The final ordinance was a stripped down version of a previous proposal that would have made it illegal to hire, do business with or loan money to illegal immigrants.

Miraglia said he toned it down a bit because the town doesn't have the money or resources to go after employers and landlords.


The businesses, landlords and bankers depend on the local immigrants' business to survive.

Ordinances like this only cause more division, distrust and bigotry, while doing nothing to actually help their local economies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
22. Kudos to the Sheriff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. Wait a minute... this came out of Pahrump?
As a Nevadan born and raised that impresses me. Kudos Pahrump! You're moving forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. well, some of them anyway ;)
Edited on Fri Nov-24-06 12:27 PM by fishwax
After all, they did pass the ordinance, and some (presumably) locals did egg the flag. But props to the sheriff :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. Let's give the Sheriff of Pahrump a pom-pom
laden cheer!!

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
68. DING DING DING! SalmonChantedEvening, you're our grand prize winner!
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 12:53 PM by rocknation
Let's give the Sheriff of Pahrump a pom-pom laden cheer!!

One pom-pom laden cheer, coming right up!


rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. I was going for an evil pun...
You know.

Come they told me, Pahrump a pom-pom
Our newbor... you know the rest ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. Oh, no. You didn't!
You did! :spank:

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. Our worstest puns we bring, Pahrump a pom-pom
:rofl:

Heya Blue! :hi: :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. Got to loooove the Sheriffs of the country.
Edited on Fri Nov-24-06 07:04 AM by BlueIris
We love the Sheriffs here in OR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
27. I wonder
Does this ordinance ban the Confederate flag also?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
29. Here's a fun fact
Prostitution is legal in Pahrump, Nevada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evilgenius602 Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. what's your point?
It's nothing that I'm interested in, but it's inconsistant to make prostitution a crime. Immoral? That's relative. Wrong and debasing? Definitely. But a crime? "Selling" is legal; "fucking" is legal; why isn't "Selling Fucking" legal? Makes no sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. Actually, I think it is legal every where. You pay an actress to make a porn
have sex, done.

Just take a video camera when picking up a prostitute, offer her money to make a movie (sex documentary, porn, whatever), have sign a waiver, and viola.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elias7 Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
52. nice syllogism
how 'bout, "drinking" is legal; "driving" is legal; why isn't "drinking & driving" legal?
Or, "fucking" is legal; "poultry" is legal; why isn't... no wait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattfromnossa Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
33. Bravo to you Sheriff Demeo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. Can we trade one consttutional office for another
Make Bush a Sheriff and Swap this guy into the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
49. Good for him!
Me, I'm just trying to imagine how a crackpot ordinance like this would go over where I live. (Chicago)

:rofl:

Especially during a FIFA World Cup year.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
63. A tad bit OT but
wasn't it Pahrump that was the town that Studio 60 On The Sunset Strip just used as the town where their "stars" were arrested on the episode from two weeks ago?

For those that don't watch the show, John Goodman was the "good ole boy" judge and the star was arrested in California for assault (when he was actually only trying to protect another actor from the show from being harassed) and it was discovered that he had a warrant for him from Pahrump NV so he was taken there to be arrested on this outstanding warrant.

It was quite and interesting show. Could it be that there are other things in play in Pahrump, thus their use in the show to draw attention to that town in a major way? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. Dammit Sydnie, you beat me to it
I was going to post a John Goodman joke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
67. Hooray for Sheriff Tony DeMeo !!
(although I would have preferred for the Parumph Judge to have been standing next to him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
70. That sheriff needs to go clean up Washington DC
BRAVO for defending the rights of all Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
74. Every St. Patrick's Day I have a brief moment of panic when I think we've been conquered by Ireland
It used to scare me so much I ended up vomiting green
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
75. Am I the only person this worries?

A sherrif deciding unilaterally not to enforce a law is not something to applaud.

If he doesn't think it's constitutional - and by the sound of it is isn't - then he should challenge it through the appropriate channels, not simply decide off his own bat not to enforce it.

What if he decided there were other laws he wasn't going to enforce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC