Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Pakistan Observer: Al-Qaeda — a Zionist weapon against Islam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:31 PM
Original message
The Pakistan Observer: Al-Qaeda — a Zionist weapon against Islam
Analysis of the other terrorists acts, occurring before or after 9/11 and ascribed to Osama / Al-Qaeda, yield the same conclusions. In each case, the planning was flawless, the attackers were provided with full logistics and latest intelligence and they acted with apt precision. Each operation primarily damaged the Muslims, their countries and their religion. In each case, it left immediate as well as long term effects.

In Osama Bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda network, the Zionists had crafted a perfect tool. The United States used Madrasas and Islamic teachings to promote militancy during the war against the Soviets, in Afghanistan.

With more than 51 million dollars in US agency for International Development Funding, between 1884 and 1994, the Centre for Afghanistan Studies at the University of Nebraska, Omaha, developed textbooks that gave religious sanctions to armed struggle in defence of Islam. Other agencies of the United States also promoted a militant Islam. Osama was an established puppet in Mossad’s and CIA’s hands; on him rested the entire cobweb of the Phoenix’s destruction.

With Zionists being able to wield enormous power, much of the non-Muslim world aligned with it and Muslim Countries being militarily weak, mutually disunited and led by self-centred weak leaders, is there any hope or possibility of any escape from what seems writ large over the horizon?

http://www.pakobserver.net/200611/25/Articles04.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. ....they are getting warmer :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They'll be getting warmer still when they roast in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Filthy rotten antisemitic garbage from the Pakistan Observer.
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 12:03 AM by Jim Sagle
I note that you skipped the FIRST graf (emphasis mine):

Before September 11, 2001, one could hardly find any mention of Al-Qaeda in the US media. But after that, the dramatic attacks by both the electronic and print Media began to speak of this hitherto almost unknown entity, throwing up their deep seeded knowledge, as though they had known it for many long years. One feels like recalling, recollecting and reflecting on everything concerning the puzzle. The remote control technology, Global HAWK, was used to wrest the flight controls of the four “hijacked” planes from the pilots and direct the planes to their targets.Both Carol Valentine and David Duke listed a multitude of Israel’s treacheries to America and trounced Israel and its local collaborators — America’s Jewish citizens who also hold Israeli citizenship and are loyal exclusively to the state of Israel.As against the much trumpeted 3,000 deaths of Jews, only three were declared confirmed dead, according to Alon Pinkas, Israel’s Consul General in New York. Simultaneously, India began to blame Pakistan also for hijacking its planes. This was to strengthen Zionist’s allegations against Al-Qaeda. Analysis of the other terrorists acts, occurring before or after 9/11 and ascribed to Osama / Al-Qaeda, yield the same conclusions. In each case, the planning was flawless, the attackers were provided with full logistics and latest intelligence and they acted with apt precision. Each operation primarily damaged the Muslims, their countries and their religion. In each case, it left immediate as well as long term effects.

Both Carol Valentine and David Duke are notorious Nazi filth, yet this "article" uses them as a character reference for its antisemitic bilge. Mind telling us why you thought it worthy of inclusion on a Democratic site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Although a POS article, it is very useful.
It shows how anti-Semitism can be "gussied up" and passed off as "legitimate" discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. I think it is totally depressing to see people buy into it.
I can't believe anyone on DU would think like that, and believe me I'm no fan of Israel. I'm still shocked someone would believe something so obviously anti-Semitic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. i think M Zaman Malik
should write for the stormfront. he starts his -what ever one could call it-with the idea that no one ever heard of the al quaeda in the usa and then it gets even worse. i haven`t read anything so, what shall i say? paranoid? in a long time...well since the last time i was at stormfront.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. What scares me
is the fact that I could actually see them being right on this.False flag operations have been used before by many goverments over the years.And we all know what paragons of honesty and virtue bushco are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh, please
Endorsement of this kind of slime is reprehensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I think this is a bunch of bullshit, and I am not a big fan of Israel's brutality.
Everyone in that part of the world could use a reality check.

Israel is not responsible for terrorist attacks, the various anti-Israel Muslim hate organizations are.

The Palestinians are not responsible for Israel's inhumane and brutal collective punishment of Palestine.

The US is very responsible for hanging Israel out to dry, basically like leaving a hen in the fox den (much worse then letting a fox guard the hen house.) We are using Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fascinating Article on a couple of levels
First off;

Yes, this is antisemitic to the core, but consider:

Here we have a major Pakistan paper saying that Al-Qaeda is nothing more than a US/Zionist Covert Op designed to subjugate the Islamic People.

Talk about trying to pull the rug out from under someone!

Second:

Note also that they talk about the period (and I'm assuming that the dates printed in the OP are wrong) 1984-1994, when the CIA was shoveling support at the Mujahadeen.

Wasn't our soon-to-be Sec of Def was running that little show?


Ahh, things that make you go "HHMMMMMM" early on a nice Sat Morning.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. You know what I see, the real problem behind al-Qaeda is not Israel...
it's the fact that the people in this belt, which extends from Syria all the way to Pakistan, through India, and through Indonesia, are so out of touch with reality they are blaming crimes of fellow Muslims on Jews.

Think about that for a second.

How can there be outrage at their own, if they are out of touch with the reality that their own are responsible for 9/11, so much so they blame it on Jews and Israel?

Don't you see the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Are you actually endorsing the Pakistan
article by posting this little snippet, which is nothing more than an accusation that's 4 years old? Did anything ever come of this? Any evidence at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. BREAKING! THIS JUST IN!
All Jews found to be manifestation of Satan!

:scared:

:sarcasm:

I'm surprised these assholes haven't tried to push bird flu and AIDS on Jews. I may not agree with the inhumanity of Israel, but I also do not agree with the inhumanity of many Muslims and non-Muslim Arabs in the vicinity of Israel.

This kind of shit doesn't address real concerns, and that is the reason it is nothing but anti-Semitic crap.

If this was an article about the use of WP by Israel, ok.
If this was an article disagreeing with the approach Israel has to fighting terror, ok.

BUT OH NO, THESE FUCKERS GO OUT AND BLAME ISRAEL FOR TERRORIST ATTACKS! Rather than face up to their own culture's dark side, they lie. The hatred of Jews is totally obvious in this fucked up article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
15. Who gave this three recomendations?
:shrug:

You ought to be very ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Who did the fourth one?
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 07:46 AM by originalpckelly
This looks really bad people, because it shows that someone around here either intentionally or unwittingly an anti-Semite.

This article is hardly from a reliable source, though it does give an understanding of why al-Qaeda enjoys popular support in that part of the world. This is propaganda.

If you don't acknowledge that al-Qaeda was the organization which attacked the USA, how can you condemn them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. The funny thing is that the evidence presented here makes it clear Al-qaeda is a CIA creation.
They pointedly omit how closely the CIA worked with the Pakistani ISI and how the intimately involved the ISI was in supporting and exploiting Al-qaeda and the Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. There we go. You see that actually makes sense...
because we did actually fund the ISI to fund the various "Mujahadeen" in Afghanistan during the '80s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. locking
antisemitic flamebait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC