Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is Cheney really doing in Saudi Arabia?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:18 PM
Original message
What is Cheney really doing in Saudi Arabia?
Is he on a arms deal mission? Or is he BORROWING MORE MONEY? I think it's both. I think Bush was in Singapore for the same reason. The Chinese/US military exercise was probably a "product demo". What was the deal? I think we can guess. Let's try.. Bush: "When we're out on our joint military excercise, you can see our new stuff" "We'll give you a discount, if you loan us some more money" "Dick and I only have 2 years left to shop and we want to "shop till we drop". heh heh...
Chinese: "Will you add some military technology tranfer to that discount?" Bush: "You drive a hard bargain" "Yes" "We can transfer some good tech stuff when we're out on the excercise" "Then you can buy some more of our bonds" heh heh...

Cheney: "Your Highness" "George and I only have 600 more shopping days until Christmas" "We'd like to get started early" "We need another loan" snarl snarl...Saudi's: "No problem Dick" Anything else?" Cheney: "How about a few F15's?" Saudi's "We'd have to cut oil production by a few million barrels" Cheney: "No problem" snarl snarl...

I just hope that the Dems understand that the first order of business is the CUT UP THE WHITEHOUSE CREDIT CARDS! I think even the conservative voters would agree with that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh probably trying to negotiate basing rights for 150,000 US troops
Edited on Sun Nov-26-06 12:35 PM by kenny blankenship
If the Iraq Invasion was intended to set off a region wide blossoming of democracy, and not (so they would have us believe) an attempt to drive US tanks up to the western border of Iran, the geniuses in the Pentagon now have to be thinking more in old domino-theory terms of holding an East-West line of US influence. Unfortunately for American planners, there ain't no more rear area to pull back to, besides Saudi Arabia itself. The Magic Kingdom is the last domino, and the one they really worry about; they wanted to protect it by going on the offensive and by surrounding it with buffer states like a compliant Iraq. Now that the offensive has failed, they have to be thinking about digging in for the Big One in Saudi Arabia. I suspect that would be the topic of conversation for Dick's visit. However, the more they prepare militarily for this possible battle and the more visibly they prepare for it, the more certain it is to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. We never lost those basing rights. We just aren't using them to the extent we used to....
TThose fairhaired boys greeting Dick in the B roll footage they were showing on the cables were stationed there.

They play this game where they move people around, to Qatar especially, so that it looks like we aren't doing much there, and everyone looks the other way....the old "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" trick.

The Saudis walk a tightrope between snuggling up in bed with BushCo and appeasing the Wahabbi fanatics to whom they've given a slice of power in hopes of keeping them appeased. It's a delicate balance. It might not last forever....

But here was his mission, putatively, anyway:

Cheney seeks Saudi help on Iraq



http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/World/2006/11/26/2502203-sun.html

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia -- U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney sought Saudi help yesterday in dealing with Iraq's spiralling violence and other regional trouble spots where U.S. policy is on the line: Iran, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories.

Cheney's visit with King Abdullah was brief, lasting only a few hours before he flew back to Washington, but it underlined the two allies' concerns over upheavals across the Middle East, which many Arabs blame on U.S. policies. In a sign of the urgency of the U.S. concern, President George W. Bush is scheduled to meet with Iraq's prime minister in the Jordanian capital Wednesday and Thursday to discuss security matters. ... The meeting at Yamama Palace likely focused on both conflicts, as well as the Israeli-Palestinian front, amid attempts to form a new Palestinian government and get peace negotiations going.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I don't believe anything the media says......
Iraq is becoming a "weapon of mass distraction". I think it's "bidness".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Didn't we just pull out troops from SA?
Won't US troops in the Holy Land just create more terra?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalArkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think to beg the Saudi's to not change from the dollar to the Euro.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They own 30% of City Bank. I don't think they want to do that..
Besides, owning billions of dollars in US bonds, gives them the power to destroy the dollar anytime they want. Why bother when relations are so "peachy"...They will save that move for later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. You are probably right ",We have got some battle field tested
weapons we can sell you at a good price, no I don't have an invoice ,it fell off the truck"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just another secret energy summit. No big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah! Now that Bushco is a member of OPEC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. asking the only people that still .....
like him and Bush for help.

The Saudi's aren't aren't gonna be able to help them out of this major fuck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I want to pull the Secret Service protection from the Saudi Embassy
in DC. I don't want to pay taxes to Bush's friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. There is generally only one reason our VP goes to Saudi Arabia...
... issues of money and financial support are important and can be handled through emissaries. Issues that involve security are a different matter, and that is why Cheney is there personally to explain what is about to happen.

Saudi Arabia's oil fields and their routes for shipping oil out of the country are both vulnerable to attack. Cheney is there to explain the upcoming military action that might trigger attacks on the Saudi's interests.

Cheney is there personally because the Saudi Royal Family will have to deal with a majority that could rise up and depose them.

The military action that is coming is going to be bloody and massive, before we leave Iraq.
Whether we go against Iran directly is the million dollar question. I suspect the decision has already been made, and regardless of the choice the Saudi's friendly relations with the US will put them and their assets at risk. Thus the personal trip by CHeney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Or maybe Doro is coming back on the market...
I've have never seen the Iraq conflict as having anything to do with national security. I find it odd that that Saudi's, who are Sunni, are
letting the Sunni's in Iraq be slaughterd by Bushco. I hope there is an overthrow of the House of Saud. They're corrupt as Hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Is Iraqi PM still planning to meet with bush in ME?
Dick is not especially inhibited about anything and he NEEDS to get some SERIOUS power in his paws as the DEMS prepare to have a lot of hearings and investigations into matters that will get Dick hanged.

Put NOTHING past him. Not just prospect of an attack on Iran scares me. If it would ultimately save his bacon, he would be capable of anything. Would a major attack on any particular US personnel visiting abroad give him power to declare himself CIC and the nation under martial law? The junta sure as hell is inviting trouble.

Dick cornered is a dangerous rabid dog. And Dick is about to be cornered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. I wish your post didn't make so much sense, and my hair stand up on end.
But I think you've thrown something against the wall that has to stick.

I would also expect that Cheney and bush need to make sure the king has his story straight about who did what and said what before 9/11 and the invasion.

They're both about to be sued by Plame and I'm sure they've got exposure on the rigging of the intel and the flying out of the bin ladens on 9/12.

Wanna make sure the towel heads cover their royal buts, in order to protect their carslyle group assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Getting a good assfuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. CNN is now reporting on Cheney's visit........
That POS from the AIE is saying it's about Iraq. I don't think so. I think it's bidness as usual...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bush to sell arms at NATO Summit (real politik)
I told you so...

Bush to seek more spending at NATO summit
Big News Network
Wednesday 22nd November, 2006 (UPI)



U.S. President George Bush will call on fellow NATO members to increase defense spending at a NATO summit in Latvia next week.

Judy Ansley, senior director for European Affairs at the National Security Council briefed reporters in Washington on the summit in Riga and said Bush would repeat his longstanding call for more involvement in NATO missions from fellow members.

Ansley said Bush would also discuss problems in the NATO mission in Afghanistan when the summit begins Nov. 29.

I think that you can expect that there will be discussion about the need for some flexibility in where troops are, for an increase in the number of troops, maybe a decrease in some of the restrictions on troops that are currently there, Ansley said.

She said the summit was also expected to announce a new initiative in which 14 allies plus Sweden will be buying heavy C-17 aircraft to upgrade strategic airlift capabilities.

NATO has some 50,000 soldiers involved in six missions on three continents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. I shudder to think.
They didn't send Condi. They sent "made man" Cheney. So it's likely that something really dirty is going down. It might be as simple as Cheney "advising" the Saudis on which palms to grease and which leaders are "cooperative." It could be a total "one hand washes the other" scenario where the American public gets soaked and betrayed in return for a favor to the Bush Administration by the Saudis. Bush and Cheney are effectively Saudis.

And you are absolutely right. Their credit cards need to be cut up, not just the official ones but the unofficial ones like the Saudi, Enron-esque slush fund. With Dems in the Congress, watch for Bush and Cheney to sell out the United States on every front, from trade to currency exchange rates to job outsourcing to immigration. The Bushies can either get geopolitical traction from working with Dems in an open political process or through secret deals. Which will they choose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. 2 years of selling US assets as fast as they can.....yepper...
Selling the hard assets too, like to attempt to sell ports to the Carlyle Group. We will have to form a DU ASS Protection Group...To keep track of the auction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Cheney met with the Saudis in DC as well - from earlier this month
and not just Cheney - Rumsfeld did as well.

"PRINCE KHALID BIN SULTAN CHAIRS THE MEETING OF THE STRATEGIC JOINT PLANNING COMMITTEE (JPC) IN ...
Ain al Yaqeen: Assistant Minister of Defense and Aviation for Military Affairs Prince Khalid Bin Sultan chaired a meeting of the Strategic Joint Planning Committee (JPC) at the Pentagon in Washington. The JPC aims to enhance interaction between the Saudi and the US militaries and to support the Kingdom's efforts to upgrade its military capabilities. The meeting was attended by the head of the American training mission in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Saudi military attaché in the US. Prince Khalid met with Vice President Dick Cheney for discussions on various issues of mutual interest. The US Vice-President Dick Cheney received Prince Khalid Bin Sultan Bin Abdul Aziz, Assistant Defense and Aviation Minister for Military Affairs. Prince Khalid..."

Click here to read more »


http://article.wn.com/view/2006/11/17/prince_khalid_bin_sultan_chairs_the_meeting_of_the_strategic/



And from the Saudi Embassy page

http://www.saudiembassy.net/2006News/News/NewsDetail.asp?cIndex=6622


"Also yesterday, Prince Khalid met with Vice President Dick Cheney for discussions on various issues of mutual interest.

In the evening, Prince Khalid attended a reception held in his honor by the US Department of Defense."

"Prince Khalid concludes meetings with US officials (02/11/2006)

The Strategic Joint Planning Committee (JPC) concluded its meetings at the Pentagon in Washington yesterday. The Saudi delegation was headed by Assistant Minister of Defense and Aviation for Military Affairs Prince Khalid bin Sultan
The JPC aims to enhance interaction between the Saudi and the US militaries and to support the Kingdom’s efforts to upgrade its military capabilities.
After the meetings, Prince Khalid met separately with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of the Navy Donald Winter, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Ted Moseley and Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Edmund Giambastiani for talks.
In the evening, Prince Khalid attended a dinner in his honor hosted by Saudi Ambassador to the US Prince Turki Al-Faisal."

 http://www.saudiembassy.or.jp/En/News/Current/2006/Nov/27-3.htm#Prince_Khalid_concludes_meetings_with_US_officials




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Good catch.. Notice the date... 11/17/06 Ten days after the election
They didn't waste any time.. Getting down to bidness. BASTARDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Cheney's and the Bushies financial holdings.....
By Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine

Vice President Dick Cheney's financial advisers are apparently betting on a rise in inflation and interest rates and on a decline in the value of the dollar against foreign currencies. That's the conclusion we draw after scouring the financial disclosure form released by Cheney recently.

As of the end of last year, Cheney and his wife, Lynne, held between $10 million and $25 million in Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt fund (VWSTX, news, msgs) (it's impossible to be more precise because the disclosure form lists holdings within ranges). The fund's holdings of tax-free municipal bonds mature, on average, in a little more than a year -- meaning that the fund should hold up well if rates rise.

The Cheneys held another $1 million to $5 million in Vanguard Tax-Exempt Money Market fund (VMSXX, news, msgs), which is practically risk-free and could benefit from continued increases in short-term interest rates. And the couple had between $2 million and $10 million in Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities fund (VIPSX, news, msgs). The principal and interest payments of inflation-protected bonds rise along with consumer prices, making them good inflation hedges.


Expecting dollar drop?
The Cheneys also had between $10 million and $25 million in American Century International Bond (BEGBX, news, msgs). The fund buys mainly high-quality foreign bonds (predominantly in Europe) and rarely hedges against possible increases in the value of the dollar. Indeed, its prospectus limits dollar exposure to 25% of assets and the fund currently has only 6% of assets in dollars, according to an American Century spokesman.

The Cheneys' total assets could be as high as $94.6 million, according to the disclosure form. The vice president's advisers say the vice president pays no attention to his investments. His lawyer, Terrence O'Donnell, says outside money managers supervise the investments. "He has nothing to do with it," O'Donnell says.

Bushes' investments meek
President Bush may be bold in his public policies, but his private investments appear decidedly on the meek side. Bush and his wife, Laura, reported on their disclosure form that they held combined assets of $7.2 million to $20.9 million.

As of the end of last year, the Bushes' two largest assets were their Texas ranch, valued at between $1 million and $5 million, and a blind trust, also valued at between $1 million and $5 million. Of course, it's impossible to tell how the trust is invested, so it could be heavily in stocks. The White House would not make the trust's managers available for comment.

Beyond the trust, the First Family's investable assets are largely in super-safe Treasury notes, money market funds and bank certificates of deposit. The Bushes' holdings in these instruments totaled between $1.7 million and $4.4 million. The president also listed a health savings account worth between $1,000 and $15,000.

The Bushes confine most of their stock investing to their relatively small IRAs and to the president's retirement account from when he was governor of Texas. As of last December, that account was worth $108,016 and was invested entirely in Vanguard Wellington (VWELX, news, msgs), which owns stocks and bonds. The president's IRA, worth $87,074, includes $30,142 in Capital Income Builder, a balanced fund that's part of the American funds family; $30,866 in Growth Fund of America, another American fund; and $24,219 in zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bonds. Nearly all of the first lady's IRA, worth $8,556, was also in Capital Income Builder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. Corp Watch Lockeed Martin
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=9
Lockheed Martin

The world's #1 military contractor, responsible for the U-2 and SR-71 spy planes, F-16, F/A-22 fighter jet, and Javelin missiles. They've also made millions through insider trading, falsifying accounts, and bribing officials.

CEO: Robert J. Stevens
Military contracts 2005: $19.4 billion
Total contributions for the 2004 election cycle: $2,212,836*

This Bethesda, Maryland-based company is the world's #1 military contractor as well as the world’s largest arms exporter. Lockheed Martin built the U-2 and the SR-71 Blackbird spy planes. Today they make F-16, F/A-22 jet fighter, Hellfire and Javelin missiles, as well as designing nuclear weapons. Its F-117 stealth attack fighters were used to “shock and awe” the population of Iraq at the start of the US invasion, while since the start of that war the Air Force has increased production of Lockheed’s PAC-3 Patriot missile – which cost $91 million per copy.

According to the Arms Trade Resource Center, Lockheed Martin gets $105 from each U.S. taxpayer and $228 from each U.S. household. In 2002 the company was effectively taxed at 7.7% compared to an average tax rate for individuals of 21-33%.

In late 2001 the company was awarded the world's largest weapons contract ever, a $200 billion deal to build the Joint Strike Fighter, a "next-generation" combat jet that eventually will replace aircraft used by the Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps. In the last few years the SEC has investigated Lockheed for insider trading and falsifying their accounts.

Lockheed Martin did not win the contract on force of personality alone, or fighter plane design. During the calendar year 2000, Lockheed Martin spent more than $9.8 million lobbying members of Congress and the Clinton administration, more than double the $4.2 million the company spent during 1999. Among the company's newest lobbyists: Haley Barbour, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee. During the 1999-2000 election cycle, Lockheed Martin contributed just over $2.7 million in soft money, PAC and individual contributions to federal candidates and parties. More than two-thirds of that money went to Republicans. Lockheed Martin spends more on lobbying Congress than any of its competitors, spending a whopping $9.7 million in 2002. Only General Electric and Philip Morris reported more lobbying expenses. And in the 2004 election cycle, Lockheed contributed more than $1.9 million.

Lockheed has also been able to exercise its influence in a larger way – in support of the invasion of Iraq. The company’s former vice-president Bruce Jackson chaired the Coalition for the Liberation of Iraq, a bipartisan group formed to promote Bush’s plan for war in Iraq. Bruce Jackson was also involved in corralling the support for the war from Eastern European countries, going so far as helping to write their letter of endorsement for military intervention. Not surprisingly, Lockheed also has business relations with these countries. In 2003 Poland shelled out $3.5 billion for 48 F-16 fighter planes, which it was able to buy with a $3.8 billion loan from the US.

In 1976 Lockheed paid millions of dollars to Japanese government officials to smooth the way for the sale of Lockheed's airplanes to a Japanese airline corporation, All Nippon Airways. They paid Japanese gangster and yakuza chief Kodama Yoshio $2.1 million in payoffs to help them sell their new wide-bodied passenger airplane, the TriStar L1011, against stiff competition from Boeing and McDonnell-Douglas. Kodama relied on familiar yakuza techniques to force the resignation of Tetsuo Oba, president of All Nippon Airways. At a stockholders' meeting, Kodama packed the room with "sokaiya" -- financial specialists -- who leaked information about an illegal $1 million loan which had been paid to Oba. In disgrace, ANA's president stepped down to be replaced by a candidate favorable to Kodama's interests.

The former prime minister, the former minister of transportation, and the former parliamentary vice-minister of transportation were arrested and prosecuted. The former prime minister was sentenced to four years imprisonment with forced labor but he died while the case was in the Supreme Court.

*Source: opensecrets.org

Links
Lockheed Martin
Arms Trade Resource Center
Taxpayers for Common Sense



CANADA: Our side of defence
by Jorge Barrera, The Ottawa Times
August 20th, 2006

Ottawa may have the reputation of a government town, but it's also home to Canada's military-industrial complex.

Intelligence in Iraq: L-3 Supplies Spy Support
by Pratap Chatterjee, Special to CorpWatch
August 9th, 2006

L-3 Communications, a little-known but gigantic military contractor, provides 300 contract intelligence experts to the Pentagon in Iraq to support operations ranging from interrogation to media analysis. The secretive $426.5 million operation, which is run out of Virginia, may be a recipe for disaster, say critics.
Also see related story, A Translator's Tale, by Pratap Chatterjee.

A Translator's Tale
by Pratap Chatterjee, Special to CorpWatch
August 9th, 2006

Goran Habbeb was shot and left for dead by gunmen in Iraq for helping troops in counter-intelligence tasks. He worked for Titan, a military contractor, who supply translators to the military under a profitable multi-billion dollar contract. Almost 200 of their workers have been killed, the highest by far of any contractor in Iraq.

US: Federal contracts up 86% under Bush; Halliburton rises 600%
Raw Story
June 20th, 2006

Top contractor Lockheed got contracts larger than budget of Congress, Dept. of Interior

US: Bush Turns to Big Military Contractors for Border Control
by Eric Lipton, The New York Times
May 18th, 2006

The quick fix may involve sending in the National Guard. But to really patch up the broken border, President Bush is preparing to turn to a familiar administration partner: the nation's giant military contractors.

US: Boeing-Lockheed Granted Monopoly
by Andy Pasztor and Jonathan Karp, Wall Street Journal
January 7th, 2006

The Pentagon has given preliminary approval to a joint venture between Boeing Co. and Lockheed Martin Corp. for military-rocket launches, endorsing a rare monopoly that could set a precedent for defense contractors facing slower military spending, said industry and government officials.

US: Lockheed Wins $869 Mln US Navy Missile Contract
Reuters
December 20th, 2005

The U.S. Navy on Tuesday said it awarded Lockheed Martin Corp. an $869 million contract to fund continued production of Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles in fiscal year 2006.

Meet the New Interrogators: Lockheed Martin
by Pratap Chatterjee, Special to CorpWatch
November 4th, 2005

Sytex, a subsidiary of Lockheed , the world's largest military contractor, has emerged as one of the biggest recruiters of private interrogators deployed to the United States-run prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan.

US: Lockheed Martin Is Hired to Bolster Transit Security in N.Y.
by Sewell Chan and Shadi Rahimi, The New York Times
August 23rd, 2005

A new world of transit security in New York City began to take form this morning, as officials disclosed plans to saturate the transit system with 1,000 video cameras, 3,000 motion detectors and a wide array of sophisticated gadgets, all intended to buffer the city's subways, bridges and tunnels from a terror attack.

US: Business booming for U.S. defense contractors
by Peter Bauer, Menafn
August 20th, 2005

U.S. defence contractors are riding high these days, buoyed by rising Pentagon spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as the high cost of homeland security in the U.S.-declared war on terror. The fiscal 2006 defence budget is set to climb to 441 billion dollars, an increase of 21 billion dollars over 2005. It envisions an additional 50 billion dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

BELGIUM: Activists Occupy Lockheed Martin Office
FOR Mother Earth
February 22nd, 2005

A group of 13 anti-nuclear activists occupied the European headquarters of US arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin,in Brussels, in protest against the company’s close links with the Bush government, and specifically its production of nuclear weapons and weapons ued in the war against Iraq.

US: Titan to Pay Fine and Plead Guilty in Bribery Probe
by Jonathon Karp and Andy Pasztor, Wall Street Journal
January 20th, 2005

Defense contractor Titan corporation tentatively agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges and pay less than $30 million to end investigations by the Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission. As part of the settlement, Titan will admit that payments by its overseas consultants violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

US: Lockheed, BAE protest Boeing pacts
by Jonathan Karp and Andy Pasztor, Wall Street Journal
October 13th, 2004


US: Jets, IT Drive Lockheed Gains
by Renae Merle, Washington Post
April 28th, 2004

Lockheed Martin Corp. reported a 16 percent jump in first-quarter profit yesterday as demand for fighter aircraft and information technology continued to boost sales.

US: Diminished Oversight Leads to Overpricing
by David Phinney, Federal Times
April 5th, 2004

Ken Pedeleose’s eyes popped in awe as he plowed through a bill for airplane parts in 1999: $2,522 for a 4½-inch metal sleeve, $744 for a washer, $714 for a rivet, and $5,217 for a 1-inch metal bracket.

US: Lockheed's New CEO Facing Tough Challenge
by Renae Merle, Washington Post
March 8th, 2004

Robert J. Stevens, who will become chief executive of Lockheed Martin Corp. in August, is taking over from Vance D. Coffman as a rising federal budget threatens to slow defense spending, Pentagon views of high-tech warfare shift and Lockheed continues to have problems with two high-profile programs: the F/A-22 and F-35 fighter jets.

World: Making Money on Terrorism
by William Hartung, Nation
February 23rd, 2004

We all know that Halliburton is raking in billions from the Bush Administration's occupation and rebuilding of Iraq. But in the long run, the biggest beneficiaries of the Administration's "war on terror" may be the "destroyers," not the rebuilders. The nation's "Big Three" weapons makers--Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Northrop Grumman--are cashing in on the Bush policies of regime change abroad and surveillance at home.

US: Pentagon's Changing Priorities Challenge Lockheed
by Renae Merle, Washington Post
February 23rd, 2004

Lockheed's stranglehold on the military aircraft market is based on two planes, the F/A-22 Raptor and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, both frequently lambasted by members of Congress for their technological problems and growing budgets. While Lockheed dominates the fighter market, it is not secure with unmanned drones, which many experts consider the future of military aviation. And the Pentagon is thinking about radical new ways of changing warfare that could threaten Lockheed's dominance.

US: Presidential Helicopter War
by John Machacek, Gannett News Service
February 17th, 2004

Lockheed Martin, one of the world's largest aerospace and defense contractors, had begun running full-page ads in newspapers and at subway stops near the Pentagon as part of an all-out lobbying campaign to oust tiny Sikorsky as the presidential helicopter builder.

US: Making Money On Terrorism
by William D. Hartung, The Nation
February 5th, 2004

We all know that Halliburton is raking in billions from the Bush Administration's occupation and rebuilding of Iraq. But in the long run, the biggest beneficiaries of the Administration's "war on terror" may be the "destroyers," not the rebuilders. The nation's "Big Three" weapons makers--Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Northrop Grumman--are cashing in on the Bush policies of regime change abroad and surveillance at home.

Displaying 1-20 of 37
Next >>
Last Page »
« Show Complete List »

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. LM gets into the bio-metrics (iris scanning) business. I hate DHS
The Sunday Times November 26, 2006


Daon plans US biometric deal
Mark Paul



DAON, the biometrics company backed by the financier Dermot Desmond, has teamed up with a consortium led by the weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin to bid for a $1.4 billion (€1 billion) US government security contract.
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is handling tenders for the contract, which is for the Transport Worker Identification Credential (TWIC), a biometric system involving fingerprint and iris-scanning techniques that will provide 10m American transport workers with security cards. It is expected to make a decision early next month.



Daon is pitching for the key role of compiling and managing the database of security information for TWIC, which was designed to improve security at American ports and airports in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks. Lockheed Martin is proposing to manage the roll-out of the system, while four other companies including Deloitte are playing smaller parts in the group bid.

Earlier this year, Daon had been poised to win a slice of the contract in a joint venture with the American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE), but competitors complained that there had been no open bidding process and that Daon and AAAE were being handed the contract unfairly. The DHS back-tracked and decided to hold a tender instead.

Daon, which counts former DHS chief Tom Grissen as a director, has won lucrative state contracts around the world to handle biometric identification systems, including Australia, Qatar and Ireland, where the Department of Justice asked it to provide software to shore up the visa application process.

The global market for biometrics firms such as Daon is growing exponentially with the tightening up of security systems now top of the agenda for many governments. Acuity Market Intelligence has estimated that the world biometrics market could be worth $32billion by 2012.

Desmond, who is Ireland’s fifth-richest man with a personal fortune estimated at more than €1.4 billion and investments ranging from Celtic football club to tech firm Datalex, once referred to Daon as “the best company I’ve ever been involved with”.

He also recently netted €1.1 billion when he sold London City airport to a consortium comprising AIG, Credit Suisse and GE Capital. He bought the airport, which is strategically located near London’s docklands, for just £23.5m from a construction firm in 1995.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. As I posted yesterday, this Cheney thing scares the shit out of me.
WTF is he up to? If this is diplomacy, where is the State Departments involvement?
Where's Condi? Why would Cheney fly 8 hours each way to meet 'secretly' with one man, as CNN put it? The Evil Dick is Up to NO GOOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. He's selling something....Bidness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. What's Bush going to do in Jordan?
You might not have heard of SOFEX

Special Operations Forces Exhibition and Conference

http://www.sofexjordan.com/sofex_brochure.shtm

It's such a happy time. All the merchants of death get together once a year for an arms show. The link above is a brochure for the 2006 gathering. You'll love the pictures. This "happy death festival" is over for this year so Bush isn't there for that, but maybe he's discussing plans for showing the new products.

Special Operations Torture Exhibition and Conference SOTEX

Shhhhh... The negations are still underway and the bidding is fierce..
Jordan is hoping for the honor since they have been so helpful in advancing the art of torture..it's only right that they get to host the showing of the new torture devices..called AA for attitude adjustment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. The International Arms Fair Circuit
International Arms Fairs

The UK 'Partnership Pavillion' at the IDEX Arms Fair 2003 in Abu Dhabi
http://www.caat.org.uk/armsfairs/intfairs.php?url=intro

Defence Systems and Equipment International and Farnborough are just two stops in a constant global circuit of arms fairs. Most happen biennally, and over the course of two years there are more than thirty major arms fairs and numerous minor ones. They vary from 'tri-service' arms fairs (which exhibit weaponry and equipment for land, sea and air armed forces), to aerospace exhibitions, naval exhibitions and other specialist fairs. Of dedicated military events, DSEi is possibly the world's largest, with only France's Eurosatory to compete with in terms of size and importance. However, some of the bigger aerospace exhibitions such as Farnborough International and the Paris Airshow boast more exhibitors due to the additional presence of civilian aerospace companies.

Since most aerospace companies produce for both civil and military markets, and many products are dual use, it makes sense from the industry's perspective not to make a distinction between their civil and military marketing efforts. This type of exhibtion also often performs a public relations role for the arms industry, incorporating 'public days' and aerobatic shows into the event.

Naval-only fairs include Gulf Maritime in the UAE, EuroNaval in Paris and ExpoNaval Chile. Milipol Paris is the largest of the 'internal security' fairs, whilst SOFEX in Jordan is the established arms fair relating to Special Forces. Spearhead Exhibitions also organise the smaller and specialist Helitech every two years in Duxford near Cambridge, which focuses just on Helicopters; a similar show also takes place in Italy. The latest enthusiasm over Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the arms industry has also produced some small specialist shows.

Doing the circuit
Unsurprisingly since it is held in the UK, DSEi attracts more UK companies than any other arms fair, including smaller ones who make only military engines or software for instance. However, the arms trade is a global phenomenon, and to succeed, many companies know they have to make the effort to attend a whole series of fairs on the circuit. This is because arms fairs are such an integral part of the where the global arms industry does its business.

The floor plan of any large arms fair bears this out. Whilst the global giants often have a large stand of their own, others gather under a national pavilion or display area, organised either by the trade association of their country's arms industry, or by the arms sales promotion department of their national government. These organisations realise that arms fairs are an important part of arms companies' access to the global market, and act accordingly. For instance, Israel's three state-owned arms companies and numerous private ones can often be found in the area organised by Sibat, the arms sales section of the Israeli Ministry of Defence<1>.

The UK government's Defence Export Services Organisation not only helps organise DSEi, but can be found "represent the Ministry of Defence in support of the UK Defence Industry" at arms fairs around the world<2>. In 2004 alone, DESO spent over £1 million on its attendance at thirteen overseas arms fairs (see the DESO page). It often collaborates with the Defence Manufacturer's Association (DMA), the UK trade association for military industry, in facilitating the presence of UK companies at international arms fairs.

The UK's Defence Procurement minister is also a regular visitor to international arms fairs, including Defendory and SOFEX in 2004, and Aero India in 2005<3>. He is sometimes joined by Prince Andrew, the international representative for UK Trade and Investment, whose visit to SOFEX 2002 was widely reported in the British press when he bumped into the Iraqi delegation<4> .

Boosting arms exports
Just as the UK's Ministry of Defence plays a significant role in organising DSEi, all arms fairs are backed by the government of the country they are held in. From their perspective, an Arms Fair can give an important boost to a country's arms industry. This is evident from certain arms fairs which have been started relatively recently by countries trying to establish themselves in the international arms market.

Ukraine, for example, has by some estimates ranked inside the top ten of arms exporting countries in recent years, but much of this volume of transfers has been down to exporting Soviet-era surplus to Russia. With Russia seeking to decrease its reliance on Ukraine, the latter has been trying to broaden its appeal, making munitions to NATO standards and selling tanks to Pakistan<5> . Hence 'Arms and Security', organised by the Ukrainian government in Kiev in both 2004 and 2005.

Other examples of this type of fair, which tend to be relatively small and organised entirely by the government rather than by a corporate partner, include Indonesia's 'Indo Defence', and Pakistan's 'International Defence Exhibition and Seminar' (IDEAS). The latter seems to have consciously marketed itself to countries which find it difficult to buy elsewhere: "Maybe Israel we wouldn't like to sell weapons to" was the only restriction the military regime considered when the Arms Fair was launched in 2000<6> . Representatives attended IDEAS 2004 from such states as North Korea, Sudan and Burma<7> .

Geopolitics and arms fairs
Geopolitical factors also play themselves out on the arms fairs circuit. Neither Greece nor Turkey is in the big league of arms producers, but they have traditionally been hostile to each other, and are both in the top five arms importing countries<8> . Greece's 'Defendory' and Turkey's 'IDEF', are as much about facilitating their procurement process as promoting their indigenous arms industry. Defendory in particular may now have outgrown its origins and become an event of general importance to the global industry, but fairs with this purpose continue to be organised. Similarly, India's 'DefExpo' and Pakistan's IDEAS, both first organised in 2000, are undoubtedly part of the arms race in South Asia.

Brazil and South Africa are two countries vying for regional leadership in their continents. Both host arms fairs which promote themselves as gateways into the continent for global military industry. Rio De Janeiro's 'Latin America Aero and Defence' is actually organised by Reed Exhibitions Brazil, part of Reed Elsevier. At the same time it is firmly backed by the Brazilian government, not least because it hopes that Brazilian aerospace company Embraer might soon regain its previously important position in the world market. However, the focus of the event is Latin America-wide<9> .

Africa Aerospace and Defence, meanwhile, takes place in Pretoria. Although it is the relatively more wealthy South African National Defence Force that inevitably remains the biggest target for arms company' sales, the publicity for AAD 2006 tells us that "this exhibition is the ideal opportunity to gain foothold into this vast continent."<10>

International Big Business
While governments may have a variety of concerns in mind when supporting or organising an arms fair, for the companies involved it is just about maximising their opportunities to sell weaponry. Even an apparent exception, the virtual boycott of the 2003 Paris Air Show by US companies over France's opposition to the war against Iraq, was not quite as it seemed. US arms companies are particularly close to the US government, in part because their profit margin is helped enormously by the Pentagon's Foreign Military Sales programme. It was this, rather than any national loyalty which prompted them to go along with the White House line.

The organisers of arms fairs attract their exhibitors on the basis of the sheer number of visitors (and therefore potential buyers), and on the quantity and quality of invited delegations (more senior officials being better 'quality'). Delegations from big 'markets' are the best attraction, in other words, those that spend most on the military. These tend to fall into two categories; particularly rich countries, or those engaged in arms races or internal repression.

Globally, the arms trade was worth around $40 billion in 2003<11> . The wheels of this trade are oiled by the constant round of arms fairs, which are not just a showcase to help companies to sell finished products; they also provide networking opportunities for the industry and a chance to negotiate future partnerships. In other words, they are a key mechanism for the diffusion of arms across the globe.

Notes
1. See Sibat website at http://www.sibat.mod.gov.il/general/exhibitions.htm
2. Hansard, 26 Oct 2004, Column 1209W
3. See for instance DMA News, November 2004 and March 2005
4. Gilligan, Andrew 'Dad's Army hits Jordan' New Statesman, 28th October 2002
5. Hansard, 26 Oct 2004, Column 1209W
6. McCarthy, Rory 'Pakistan Enters Arms Market' in The Guardian, 7th November 2000.
7. Kucera, Joshua 'To Pakistan, with thanks', http://slate.msn.com/id/2107610
8. SIPRI Yearbook 2005, Oxford University Press 2005, p.449
9. http://www.laadexpo.com/index.php?intContentId=81
10. www.aadexpo.co.za
11. More precisely, it is estimated to be between $38 and $43 billion, see SIPRI
Yearbook 2005, Oxford University Press 2005, p442

The text on this page is adapted from chapter 5 of CAAT's DSEi 2005 Briefing (pdf, 800kb).

http://www.caat.org.uk/armsfairs/intfairs.php?url=intro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. One more kick before I go to bed.....
Good night!;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. Playing..LETS MAKE A DEAL..!
They want to make sure that when they are kicked out off the Hill they will still continue to rack in Oil revenues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. Brokering more oil deals? Covering his oily a$$?
Seeking political asylum? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. Eating Kittens.
Dick Cheney eats kittens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
38. Seeking asylum...
What else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
39. Buying a hidey-hole
For when the investigations begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
40. Doing a job interview....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC