Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When do we start calling them IRAQIS instead of "INSURGENTS"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:37 PM
Original message
When do we start calling them IRAQIS instead of "INSURGENTS"
"Insurgents" sounds ridiculous at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. A lot of the insurgents AREN'T Iraqis
A lot of them are Al Qaida foreign fighters. For example, Al-Zarqawi was Jordanian, not Iraqi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Very very few of the insurgents are foreign fighters, less than 5% last I heard.
That's less than the number of people who weren't British flying with the RAF in WW2.

The reason we don't call them the Iraqis is the same reason we don't refer the combatants in the American Civil War as Americans. You need to identify which faction is doing what fighting. The Iraqi people are hardly united against their American occupiers--they're mostly killing each other these days (more than a hundred slaughtered daily--close to 20 times the US fatality figures) and they only target American troops as targets of convenience.

What the media should do, but won't, is specify whether insurgents are Sunni extremists, al-Qaeda affiliiates, Mahdi Army Sadrists, anti-Sadr extremists from one of the several Shia breakaway factions, government fighters, ex-Baathist bandits, Baathist insurgents, or members of one of the other gazillion factions that have arisen along the Glorious March to Freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Even if foreign fighters are small in numbers, they are still influential
Case in point, Al-Zarqawi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. By the time he got liquidated he had worn out his welcome.
al qaeda will meet the same fate as us. they are outsiders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I have a better example (since you can't offer more than one example)
The US occupation force are foreign fighters. :)

But seriously, if there wasn't a homegrown opposition the foreign fighters wouldn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. about 1500 are foreign fighters
who adopt that catchy "Al-Q in Iraq" name for the cache. The vast majority are sunni and shiia fighting it out because the USA freed them to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aein Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. i think he means that there is no single "insurgency"
It's ridiculous the reporting of what's going on in iraq. Insurgents blow up shi'ite neighborhood one day. The next day, insurgents kills 50 sunnis. My god, it's a civil war! They're not an insurgency against anything, true, they both hate the US, but they're just killing each other. The majority sunni and iran versus the minority sunni and al queda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Amen to that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. We're not sure there will be Iraqis. Iraq is an artificial state
that was held together by a military strongman. For good or ill, it is returning back to its tribal states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC